Argument-based negotiation and conflict resolution through enactive role play in second life

15th International Conference on Computers in Education: Supporting Learning Flow through Integrative Technologies, ICCE 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 561-568

  Jamaludin, Azilawati ^a   Ho, Caroline Mei Lin ^a   Chee, Yam San ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Enactive role play; Immersive virtual environments; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS APPROACH; ARGUMENT-BASED NEGOTIATION; ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; NEGOTIATION; ROLE PLAY; SECOND LIFE; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT GROUPS; VIRTUAL INTERACTIONS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 59849119640     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., and Konstantinos, M. (2005) Combining software games with education and evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 54-65.
2. Hobbs, M., Brown, E., and Gordon, M. (2006) Using a virtual world for transferable skills in gaming education. Innovation in Teaching And Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(3), 42-55.
3. Brandsford, J., and Gawel, D. (2006) Thoughts on Second Life and Learning. In Proceedings of the First Second Life Education Workshop, San Francisco, California.
4. Quignard, M. (2002) A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions. In van Eemeren, F., Blair, J.A., and Willard, C. A. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA'02), Amsterdam.
5. Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. New York: Longman.
6. Rose, K. R. (1999) Teacher and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning, (pp. 167-180). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chandrasegaran, A. (2006) Secondary school students' stance-support strategies in online discussion: implications for the composition classroom. English in Education, 40(2), 22-39.
8. Cohen, R. (1987) Analyzing the structure of argumentative discourse. Computational Linguistics, 13, 11-24.
9. Clark, H., and Schaefer, E. F. (1989) Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
10. Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., and Kirschner, P. (2006) Discussing a wicked problem in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. In Clarebout, G., and Elen, J. (eds.), Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity, (pp. 197-208). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
11. Toulmin, S. (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Stark, P. B. (2000) Nonverbal negotiation skills. New York: Longman.
13. Wampold, B. E. (1992) The intensive examination of social interaction. In Kratochwill, T. R., and Levin, J. R. (eds.), Single-case research design and analysis, (pp. 93-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.