Investigating design and technology students' participation and learning in a technology mediated learning environment

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 540-555

  Yeo, Tiong Meng ^a   Quek, Choon Lang ^b  

^a Marsiling Secondary School   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849103616     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1190     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albacete, P. L. & VanLehn, K. (2000a). The Conceptual Helper: An intelligent tutoring system for teaching fundamental physics concepts. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 5th International Conference, Montreal, Canada. Gauthier, Frasson, VanLehn (eds), Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1839), 564-573.
2. Albacete, P. L. & VanLehn, K. (2000b). Evaluating the effectiveness of a cognitive tutor for fundamental physics concepts. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 25-30.
3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Archer, W. & Garrison, R. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing transcripts. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). http://www.aln.org/alnweb/ journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
4. Bonk, C. J. & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centred, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. D&T Syllabus, MOE. (2006). Design & Technology Syllabus, Secondary, Special/Express/Normal (Academic). Curriculum Planning and Development Division. Ministry of Education, Singapore.
7. Dabbagh, N. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2004). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
8. Entwistle, N. & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 258-265.
9. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Eds.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, (pp. 115-136). New York: Springer.
10. Henri, F. & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Ed.) Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential, (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
11. Hopperton, L. (1998). Computer conferencing and college education. The College Quarterly, 5(2). [viewed 27 Dec 2007, verified 25 Oct 2008] http://www.senecac.on.ca/quarterly/1998-vol05-num02-winter/ hopperton.html
12. Jamaludin, A. & Quek, C. L. (2006). Using asynchronous online discussions in primary school project work. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 64-87. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ ajet/ajet22/jamaludin.html
13. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism vs. constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm shift? Educational Technology: Research & Development, 39(3).
14. Jonassen, D. H. (1998). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. IT FORUM Paper 1. [viewed 28 Dec 2007, verified 25 Oct 2008] http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper1/paper1.html
15. Jonassen, D. H. & Kwon, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(1), 35-51.
16. Klemm, W. R. & Snell, J. R. (1996). Enriching computer-mediated group learning by coupling constructivism with collaborative learning. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 1(2). http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol1no2/article1.htm
17. Knowlton, D. S., Knowlton, H. M. & Davis, C. (2000). The whys and hows of online discussions. Syllabus: New Directions in Educational Technology, 13(10), 54-58.
18. Ng, S. L. C. & Cheung, W. S. (2007). Comparing face to face, tutor led discussion and online discussion in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 455-469. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/ng.html
19. Piaget, J. (1970). The science of education and the psychology of the child. NY: Grossman.
20. Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Palloff, R. M. & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
22. Roehler, L. & Cantlon, D. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
23. van Jooligen, W. (1999). Cognitive tools for discovery learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10, 385-397.
24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (Trans. E. Hamfnann & G. Vakar) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University.