An integrated domain analysis approach for teleoperated systems

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-46

  Nicolás, Joaquín ^a   Lasheras, Joaquín ^a   Toval, Ambrosio ^a   Ortiz, Francisco J ^b   Álvarez, Bárbara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CARTAGENA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Action research; Domain analysis; Feature modelling; Generic use cases; Product line requirements engineering; Teleoperated systems

Indexed keywords

HULLS (SHIP); MAINTENANCE; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SHIPBUILDING; SHIPS;

ACTION RESEARCH; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; FEATURE MODELLING; GENERIC USE CASES; PRODUCT LINE REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; TELEOPERATED SYSTEMS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 59849094496     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00766-008-0072-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Fernández C, Iborra A, Álvarez B, Pastor JA, Sánchez P, Fernández-Meroño JM, Ortega N (2005) Co-operative robots in the ship repair industry. IEEE Rob Autom ation Mag 12(3):65-77
2. Ortiz FP JA, Alvarez B, Iborra A, Ortega N, Rodriguez D, Conesa C (2007) Robots for hull ship cleaning. In: IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE 2007). Vigo, pp 2077-2082
3. Álvarez B, Sánchez P, Pastor JA, Ortiz F (2006) An architectural framework for modeling teleoperated service robots. ROBOTICA - Int J Inf Educ Res Rob Artif Intell 24:411-418
4. Clements P, Northrop L (2002) Software product lines. Practices and patterns. SEI series in software engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston
5. van der Linden F, Schmid K, Rommes E (2007) Software product lines in action. The best industrial practice in product line engineering. Springer, Berlin
6. Pohl K, Böckle G, van der Linden F (2005) Software product line engineering. Foundations, principles and techniques. Springer, Berlin
7. Käkölä T, Dueñas JC (2006) Software product lines. Research issues in engineering and management. Springer, Berlin
8. Rine DC, Nada N (2000) An empirical study of a software reuse reference model. Inf Softw Technol 42(1):47-65
9. Glass RL, Vessey I, Ramesh V (2002) Research in software engineering: An analysis of the literature. Inf Softw Technol 44(8):491-506
10. Baskerville RL (1999) Investigating information systems with action research. Comm Assoc Inf Syst 2(19):1-31 (article no 4)
11. EFTCoR (2005) Environmentally friendly and cost-effective technology for coating removal. In: 5th framework programme, European Community, subprogram growth reference GRD2-2001-50004. http://www.dsie.upct.es
12. Olivé A (2004) On the role of conceptual schemas in information systems development. In: Ada-Europe. LNCS 3063. 2004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pp 16-34
13. Kang K, Cohen S, Hess J, Novak W, Peterson A (1990) Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study, technical report CMU/ SEI-90-TR-21, Pittsburgh, PA, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
14. Kang KC, Kim S, Lee J, Kim K, Kim GJ, Shin E (1998) FORM: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Annals Softw Eng 5(5):143-168
15. Chastek G, Donohoe P, Kang K, Thiel S (2001) Product line analysis: A practical introduction, technical report CMU/SEI-2001-TR-001, Pittsburgh, PA, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
16. Bass L, Klein M, Bachmann F (2000) Quality attribute design primitives, technical report CMU/SEI-2000-TV-017, Pittsburgh, PA, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
17. Kang KC, Kim S, Lee J, Lee K (1999) Feature-oriented engineering of PBX software for adaptability and reusability. Softw Pract Exp 29(10):875-896
18. Lee K, Kang KC, Chae W, Choi BW (2000) Feature-based approach to object-oriented engineering of applications for reuse. Softw Pract Exp 30(9):1025-1046
19. Matinlassi M (2004) Comparison of software product line architecture design methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA. In: 26th international conference on software engineering (ICSE 2004). Edinburgh, pp 127-136
20. Trigaux J-C, Heymans P (2003) Modelling variability requirements in software product lines: A comparative survey. Computer Science Institute. University of Namur, Namur
21. Von der Massen T, Lichter H (2002) Modeling variability by UML use case diagrams. In: International workshop on requirements engineering for product lines (REPL 2002). Essen, pp 19-25
22. Griss M, Favaro J, d'Alessandro M (1998) Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB. In: 5th international conference on software reuse 1998. Vancouver, Canada, pp 76-85
23. Riebisch M, Böllert K, Streitferdt D, Philipow I (2002) Extending feature diagrams with UML multiplicities. In: 6th conference on integrated design and process technology (IDPT 2002). Pasadena
24. Svahnberg M, van Gurp J, Bosch J (2005) A taxonomy of variability realization techniques. Softw Pract Exp 35(8):705-754
25. RequisiteWeb (2008) IBM Rational RequisiteWeb. http://www-01.ibm.com/ software/rational/
26. Gomaa H (2005) Designing software product lines with UML: From use cases to pattern-based software architectures. Addison-Wesley, Boston
27. Gomaa H, Shin M (2002) Multiple-view meta-modeling of software product lines. In: 8th international conference on engineering of complex computer systems 2002, pp 238-246
28. John I, Muthig D (2002) Tailoring use cases for product line modelling. In: International workshop on requirements engineering for product lines (REPL 2002). Essen, pp 26-32
29. Halmans G, Pohl K (2003) Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Softw Syst Model 2:15-36
30. Eriksson M, Börstler J, Borg K (2004) Marrying features and use cases for product line requirements modeling of embeded systems. In: 4th conference on software engineering research and practice in Sweden (SERPS 2004)
31. Ecklund E, Delcambre L, Freiling M (1996) Change cases: Use cases that identify future requirements. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 31(10):342-358
32. Larman C (2005) Applying UML and patterns. 3rd edn, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
33. Lee K, Kang KC, Lee J (2002) Concepts and guidelines of feature modeling for product line software engineering. In: 7th international conference on software reuse. LNCS 2319. London, pp 62-77
34. Guizzardi G, Gerd W, Guarino N, van Sinderen M (2004) An ontologically well-founded profile for UML conceptual models. In: 16th international conference on advanced information system engineering (CAiSE), LNCS 3084. Riga, pp 112-126
35. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E, Mylopoulos J (2000) Non-functional requirements in software engineering. The Kluwer international series in software engineering. Kluwer, Boston
36. Ortiz F, Iborra A, Marín F, Álvarez B, Fernández-Meroño JM (2000) GOYA: A teleoperated system for blasting applied to ships maintenance. In: 3rd international conference on climbing and walking robots 2000. Madrid, pp 835-846
37. Toval A, Olmos A, Piattini M (2002) Legal requirements reuse: A critical success factor for requirements quality and personal data protection. In: IEEE international joint conference on requirements engineering (ICRE 2002 and RE 2002). IEEE Computer Press, Essen, pp 9-13
38. Toval A, Nicolás J, Moros B, García F (2002) Requirements reuse for improving information systems security: A practitioner's approach. Requir Eng 6(4):205-219
39. PuLSE (2008) PuLSE (Product Line Software Engineering). http:// www.iese.fraunhofer.de/Pulse/Bibliography/
40. Baskerville RL, Wood-Harper AT (1996) A critical perspective on action research. J Inf Tech 11:235-246
41. Barkerville R (2001) Conducting Action Research: High Risk and High Reward in Theory and Practice. In: Trauth E (ed) Qualitative research in information systems. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 192-218
42. Estay C, Pastor J (2000) Improving action research in information systems with project management. In: 2000 Americas conference on information system 2000. Long Beach, pp 1558-1561
43. Lam W, McDermid JA, Vickers AJ (1997) Ten steps towards systematic requirements reuse. Requir Eng 2(2):102-113
44. Bayer J, Gerard S, Haugen O, Mansell J, Moller-Pedersen B, Oldevik J, Tessier P, Thibault J-P, Widen T (2006) Consolidated product line variability modeling. In: Kököla T, Dueñas JC (eds) Software product lines. Research issues in engineering and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 195-241
45. BigLever-Software (2008) GEARS - software product line engineering tool and framework. http://www.biglever.com/solution/product.html