The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 247, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 319-324

  Dugas, Brice ^a   Lafontaine, Pierre Olivier ^a   Guillaubey, Alexandre ^a   Berrod, Jean Paul ^b   Hubert, Isabelle ^b   Bron, Alain M ^a   Creuzot Garcher, Catherine P ^a  

^a DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Learning curve; Pseudophakia; Retinal detachment; Scleral buckling; Vitrectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINOTOMY; SCLERA BUCKLING PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITRECTOMY;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; PSEUDOPHAKIA; RETINAL DETACHMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCLERAL BUCKLING; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 59749095598     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0997-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology (1996) The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 103:1313-1324
2. Ahmadieh H, Entezari M, Soheilian M, Azarmina M, Dehghan MH, Mashayekhi A, Sajjadi H (2000) Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol 10:153-159
3. Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, Parvaresh MM, Ghanbari H, Mehryar M, Heidari E, Behboudi H, Banaee T, Golestan B (2005) Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: Six-month follow-up results of a single operation-report no. 1. Ophthalmology 112:1421-1429
4. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Kirchhof B, Heimann K (1996) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 80:346-349
5. Bonnet M (1988) The development of severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Grade B: A determining risk factor. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:201-205
6. Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG, Stangos NT (2005) Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: A randomized clinical trial. Retina 25:957-964
7. Burton TC, Lambert RW Jr. (1978) A predictive model for visual recovery following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmology 85:619-625
8. Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Park DW, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J, Flindall RJ (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811-1815 discussion 1816
9. Cousins S, Boniuk I, Okun E, Johnston GP, Arribas NP, Escoffery RF, Burgess DB, Grand MG, Olk RJ, Schoch LH (1986) Pseudophakic retinal detachments in the presence of various IOL types. Ophthalmology 93:1198-1208
10. Cowley M, Conway BP, Campochiaro PA, Kaiser D, Gaskin H (1989) Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1147-1151
11. Escoffery RF, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Boniuk I (1985) Vitrectomy without scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 99:275-281
12. Greven CM, Sanders RJ, Brown GC, Annesley WH, Sarin LK, Tasman W, Morgan TM (1992) Pseudophakic retinal detachments. Anatomic and visual results. Ophthalmology 99:257-262
13. Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, Kellner U, Bechrakis NE, Kreusel KM, Helbig H, Krause L, Schuler A, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH (2006) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: An analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:69-78
14. Isernhagen RD, Wilkinson CP (1989) Visual acuity after the repair of pseudophakic retinal detachments involving the macula. Retina 9:15-21
15. Martin KR, Burton RL (2000) The phacoemulsification learning curve: per-operative complications in the first 3000 cases of an experienced surgeon. Eye 14(Pt 2):190-195
16. Mendrinos E, Dang-Burgener NP, Stangos AN, Sommerhalder J, Pournaras CJ (2008) Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 145:1063-1070
17. Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A (2001) Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45:187-191
18. Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV, Vohra R, Pal N, Singh DV, Chandra P (2005) Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:293-297
19. Stangos AN, Petropoulos IK, Brozou CG, Kapetanios AD, Whatham A, Pournaras CJ (2004) Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 138:952-958
20. Stern WH (1992) Complications of vitrectomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 32:205-212
21. Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, Sanchez-Pina JM (2007) Learning curve of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: Influence on visual and refractive results. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1381-1385
22. Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS, McNamara JA, Park CH, Vander JF, Ho AC, Brown GC (2006) Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:2033-2040
23. Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh AE, Sanders RJ, McMeel JW, Schepens CL (1992) Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Predisposing factors. Ophthalmology 99:453-459