Pacific Conservation Biology: An authorship and citation analysis

Pacific Conservation Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 285-303

  Calver, M C ^a   Bryant, K A ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CONSERVATION; DATABASE;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

SCOPUS;

EID: 59649125419     PISSN: 10382097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/pc080285     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Antelman, K., 2004. Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries 65: 372-382.
2. Armstrong, D. P. and McLean, I. G., 1995. New Zealand translocations: theory and practice. Pacific Conservation Biology 2: 39-54.
3. Barrett, G. W., Ford, H. A. and Recher, H. F., 1994. Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 245-256.
4. Belew, R. K., 2005. Scientific impact quantity and quality: analysis of two sources of bibliographic data. arXiv#:CoRR/0504036. On-line at: http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~rik/papers/belew05-iqq.pdf. Accessed: August 24th, 2008.
5. Bennett, A. F. and Ford, L. A., 1997. Land use, habitat change and the conservation of birds in fragmented rural environments: A landscape perspective from the Northern Plains, Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 3: 244-261.
6. Bennett, A. F., Lumsden, L. F. and Nicholls, A. O., 1994. Tree hollows as a resource for wildlife in remnant woodlands: spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 222-235.
7. Bergstrom, C., 2007. Eigenfactor: measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. C&RL News 68 (5). Online at: http://www.ala.org /ala/acri/acripubs/crlnews/backissues2007/may07/eigenfactor.cfm. Accessed: August 24th, 2008.
8. Bloch, S. and Walter, G., 2001. The Impact Factor: time for a change. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 35: 563-568.
9. Braun, T., Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A., 2005. A Hirsch-type index for journals. The Scientist 19: 8.
10. Briggs, J. C. 2005. Coral reefs: conserving the evolutionary sources. Biological Conservation 126: 297-305.
11. Broderick, D., Moritz, C., Miller, J. D., Guinea, M., Prince, R. I. T. and Limpus, C. J., 1994. Genetic studies of the hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata: evidence for multiple stocks in Australian waters. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 123-131.
12. Browman, H. I. and Stergiou, K. I., 2008. Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 1-3.
13. Butler, D., 2008. Free journal-ranking tool enters citation market. Nature 451 (7175): 114-115.
14. Butler, L., 2006. RQF Pilot study project - history and political science methodology for citation analysis. Online at www.chass-org.au/ papers/PAP20061102LB.php
15. Butler, L., 2008. Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in Australian Research Quality Framework. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 83-92.
16. Calver, M. C. and King, D. R., 2000. Why publication matters in conservation biology. Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 2-8.
17. Cameron, B. D., 2005. Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implication. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5: 105-125.
18. Campbell, P., 2008. Escape from the impact factor. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8: 5-7.
19. Christensen, F. H., Ingwersen, P. and Wormell, I., 1997. Online determination of the journal impact factor and its international properties. Scientometrics 40: 529-540.
20. Dankel, D. J., Skagen, D. W. and Ulltang, Ø., 2008. Fisheries management in practice: review of 13 commercially important fish stocks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 18: 201-233.
21. Ehrenfeld, D., 1987. Editorial. Conservation Biology 1: 6-7.
22. Elsevier 2008. Scopus journal analyzer. http:// O-info.scopus.com.prospero.murdoch.edu.au:80/journalanalyzer/. Accessed: April 25th, 2008.
23. Engvist, L, Frommen, J. G., 2008. The h-index and self-citations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 250-252.
24. Evans, J. A., 2008. Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science 321: 395-399.
25. Eysenbach, G., 2006. Citation advantage of open access articles. PloS Biology 4: 0692-0698.
26. Falagas, M. E. and Alexiou, V. G., 2008. The top ten in journal impact for manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 56: 223-226.
27. Fearn, E., (ed) 2008. 2008-2009 State of the Wild: a Global Portrait of Wildtife, Wetlands and Oceans. Island Press, Washington DC, Pp. 27-30.
28. Fenton, M. B. and McQueen, D. J., 1996. Measuring the impact of research: speaking for the environment and education. Ecoscience 3: 352-355.
29. Green, D. G., 1994. Connectivity and complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 194-200.
30. Green, R. J. and Higginbottom, K., 2000. The effects of non-consumptive wildlife tourism on free-ranging wildlife: a review. Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 183-197.
31. Grey, M. J., Clarke, M. F. and Loyn, R. H., 1998. Influence of the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala on avian diversity and abundance in remnant Grey Box woodland. Pacific Conservation Biology 4: 55-69.
32. Gross, P. L. K. and Gross, E. M., 1927. College libraries and chemical education. Science 66 (1713): 385-389.
33. Harnad, S., 2003. Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/ institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 49: 337-342.
34. Harrington, G. N. and Sanderson, K. D., 1994. Recent contraction of wet sclerophyll forest in the wet tropics of Queensland due to invasion by rainforest. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 319-327.
35. Harrison, A. L., 2006. Who's who in Conservation Biology - an authorship analysis. Conservation Biology 20: 652-657.
36. Harzing, A. K. and van der Wal, R., 2008. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 61-73.
37. Hobbs, R. J., 1993. Can revegetation assist in the conservation of biodiversity in agricultural areas? Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 29-38.
38. Jacsó, P., 2006a. Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs. Online Information Review 30: 188-193.
39. Jacsó, R, 2006b. Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review 30: 297-309.
40. Jain, N. C., 2008. SCImago Journal and country rank. Current Science 94: 701.
41. Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R. and Egghe, L., 2007. The R- and AR- indices: complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52: 855-863.
42. Jones, T. H., Hanney, S. and Buxton, M. J., 2006. The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons. BMC Informatics and Decision Making 6: Article no. 24, 9pp.
43. Kelly, C. D., Jennions, M. D., 2006. The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 167-170.
44. Kennedy, D., 2003. Multiple authors, multiple problems. Science 301(5634): 733.
45. Kozlov, M. V. and Hurlbert, S. H., 2006. Psuedoreplication, chatter, and the international nature of science: a response to D.V. Tatarnikov. Journal of Fundamental Biology (Moscow) 67: 145-152. (Original paper in Russian: English translation obtained from the authors).
46. Lawrence, P. A., 2008. Lost in publication: how measurement harms science. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 9-11.
47. Leimu, R, Koricheva, J., 2005. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 28-32.
48. Leydesdorff, L., 2007. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 278-287.
49. Lunney, D., Curtin, A., Ayers, D., Cogger, H. G. and Dickman, C. R., 1996. An ecological approach to identifying the endangered fauna of New South Wales. Pacific Conservation Biology 2: 212-231.
50. Meho, L. I. and Yang, K., 2007. Impact of data sources on citations counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 2105-2125.
51. Moritz, C., 1993. Why we need a new journal. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 1.
52. Nisonger, T. E., 2004. Citation autobiography: an investigation of ISI database coverage in determining author citedness. College & Research Libraries 65: 152-63.
53. Pauly, D. and Stergiou, K. I., 2005. Equivalence of results from two citations analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google Scholar service. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 5: 33-35.
54. Possingham, H. P., Lindenmayer, D. B. and Norton, T. W., 1993. A framework for the improved management of threatened species using population viability analysis (PVA). Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 39-45.
55. Recher, H. F. and Calver, M., 2004. Conservation biology in the Pacific. Conservation Biology 18: 1449-1451.
56. Reedijk, J. (1998) Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data. New Journal of Chemistry 22: 767-770.
57. Richards, S. J., McDonald, K. R. and Alford, R. A., 1993. Declines in populations of Australia's endemic tropical rainforest frogs. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 66-77.
58. Richmond, R. H. A., Rongo, T. B., Golbuu, Y. C., Victor, S. C., Idechong, N. D. E., Davis, G. F., Kostka, W. G., Neth, L. H., Hamnett, M. I. and Wolanski, E. J., 2007. Watersheds and coral reefs: conservation science, policy, and implementation. BioScience 57: 598-607.
59. SCImago, 2007. SJR - SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http:// www.scimagojr.com. Accessed: August 23rd, 2008.
60. Seglen, P. O., 1994. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45: 1-11.
61. Seglen, P. O., 1997. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314: 497-502.
62. Stergiou, K. I. S. and Tsikliras, A. C., 2006. Underrepresentation of regional ecological research output by bibliometric indices. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 6: 15-17.
63. Tijessen, R. J. W., 2007. Africa's contribution to the worldwide research literature: new analytical perspectives, trends and performance indicators. Scientometrics 71: 303-327.
64. Tijessen, R. J. W., Mouton, J., van Leeuwen, T.N. and Boshoff, N., 2007. How relevant are local scholarly journals in global science? A case study of South African science. Research Evaluation 15: 163-174.
65. Thomson Reuters 2008a. The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/ journalselection/. Accessed: August 25th, 2008.
66. Thomson Reuters 2008b. The scientific business of Thomson Reuters launches expanded journal coverage in web of science by adding 700 regional journals. http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/press/2008/ 8455931/. Accessed: August 25th, 2008.
67. Tongway, D. J. and Ludwig, J. A., 1994. Small-scale resource heterogeneity in semi-arid landscapes. Pacific Conservation Biology 1: 201-208.
68. Twigg, L. E. and King, D. R., 2000. Artificially enhanced tolerance to fluoroacetate and its implications for wildlife conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology 6: 9-13.
69. Whitehouse, G. H., 2002. Impact factors: facts and myths. European Radiology 12: 715-717.
70. Williams, S. E., Pearson, R. G. and Walsh, P. J., 1996. Distributions and biodiversity of the terrestrial vertebrates of Australia's wet tropics: A review of current knowledge. Pacific Conservation Biology 2: 327-362.
71. Woinarski, J. C. Z. and Recher, H. F., 1997. Impact and response: A review of the effects of fire on the Australian avifauna. Pacific Conservation Biology 3: 183-205.
72. Yang, K. and Meho, L., 2007. CiteSearch: next-generation citation analysis. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries. Pp.101-102 in Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries ed by R. Larson, E. Rasmussen, S. Sugimoto and E. Toms. Available on-line at http://portal.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=1255194&dl=&coll= Accessed: August 25th, 2008.