Connectionist semantic systematicity

Cognition

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 358-379

  Frank, Stefan L ^a   Haselager, Willem F G ^a   van Rooij, Iris ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analogical representation; Connectionism; Semantics; Sentence comprehension; Systematicity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPETENCE; COMPREHENSION; GAME; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL FUNCTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SIMULATION; TAXONOMY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 59649122675     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aizawa K. Exhibiting versus explaining systematicity: A reply to Hadley and Hayward. Minds and Machines 7 (1997) 39-55
2. Aizawa K. Explaining systematicity. Mind & Language 12 (1997) 115-136
3. Aizawa K. The systematicity arguments (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
4. Altmann G.T.M. Learning and development in neural networks - The importance of prior experience. Cognition 85 (2002) B43-B50
5. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 577-660
6. Bechtel W., and Abrahamsen A. Connectionism and the mind (1991), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
7. Bodén M. Generalization by symbolic abstraction in cascaded recurrent networks. Neurocomputing 57 (2004) 87-104
8. Bodén M., and Niklasson L. Semantic systematicity and context in connectionist networks. Connection Science 12 (2000) 111-142
9. Brooks R.A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47 (1991) 139-159
10. Budiu R., and Anderson J.R. Interpretation-based processing: a unified theory of semantic sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science 28 (2004) 1-44
11. Butler K. Connectionism, classical cognitivism and the relation between cognitive and implementational levels of analysis. Philosophical Psychology 6 (1993) 321-333
12. Bylander T. The computational complexity of propositional STRIPS planning. Artificial Intelligence 69 (1994) 165-204
13. Chalmers D.J. Syntactic transformations on distributed representations. Connection Science 2 (1990) 53-62
14. Chalmers D.J. Connectionism and compositionality: Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong. Philosophical Psychology 6 (1993) 305-319
15. Chang F. Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 609-651
16. Chiel H.J., and Beer R.D. The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurosciences 20 (1997) 553-557
17. Clancey W.J. Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representation (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
18. Clark A. Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Cook S. The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM symposium on theory of computing (1971), ACM Press, New York 151-158
20. Cooper G.F. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 42 (1990) 393-405
21. Dennett D.C. Mother nature versus the walking encyclopedia: A western drama. In: Ramsey W., Stich S., and Rumelhart D. (Eds). Philosophy and connectionist theory (1991), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 21-30
22. Desai R. A model of frame and verb compliance in language acquisition. Neurocomputing 70 (2007) 2273-2287
23. Dominey P.F. Emergence of grammatical constructions: Evidence from simulation and grounded agent experiments. Connection Science 17 (2005) 289-306
24. Elman J.L. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 179-211
25. Fodor J.A., and McLaughlin B. Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution does not work. Cognition 35 (1990) 183-204
26. Fodor J.A., and Pylyshyn Z.W. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28 (1988) 3-71
27. In: Ford K.M., and Pylyshyn Z.W. (Eds). The robot's dilemma revisited: The frame problem in Artificial Intelligence (1996), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
28. Frank S.L. Learn more by training less: Systematicity in sentence processing by recurrent networks. Connection Science 18 (2006) 287-302
29. Frank S.L., and Haselager W.F.G. Robust semantic systematicity and distributed representations in a connectionist model of sentence comprehension. In: Sun R., and Miyake N. (Eds). Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 226-231
30. Frank S.L., Koppen M., Noordman L.G.M., and Vonk W. Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 875-910
31. Frank S.L., and Čerňanský M. Generalization and systematicity in echo state networks. In: Love B.C., McRae K., and Sloutsky V.M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2008), Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX
32. Garey M.R., and Johnson D.S. Computers and intractability: A guide to the theory of NP-completeness (1979), Freeman, New York
33. Hadley R.F. Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind & Language 9 3 (1994) 247-272
34. Hadley R.F. Systematicity revisited: Reply to Christiansen and Chater and Niklasson and van Gelder. Mind & Language 9 (1994) 431-444
35. Hadley R.F. On the proper treatment of semantic systematicity. Minds and Machines 14 (2004) 145-172
36. Hadley R.F., and Cardei V.C. Language acquisition from sparse input without error feedback. Neural Networks 12 (1999) 217-235
37. Hadley R.F., and Hayward M.B. Strong semantic systematicity from Hebbian connectionist learning. Minds and Machines 7 (1997) 1-37
38. Hadley R.F., Rotaru-Varga A., Arnold D.V., and Cardei V.C. Syntactic systematicity arising from semantic predictions in a Hebbian-competitive network. Connection Science 13 1 (2001) 73-94
39. Haselager W.F.G. Cognitive science and folk psychology: The right frame of mind (1997), Sage, London
40. Haselager W.F.G., and van Rappard J.F.H. Connectionism, systematicity, and the frame problem. Minds and Machines 8 (1998) 161-179
41. Haugeland J. An overview of the frame problem. In: Pylyshyn Z.W. (Ed). The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence (1987), Ablex, Norwood, NJ 77-93
42. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
43. Judd J.S. Neural network design and the complexity of learning (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
44. Kerkhofs R., and Haselager W.F.G. The embodiment of meaning. Manuscrito - Revista Internacional de Filosofia 29 (2006) 753-764
45. Kintsch W., and van Dijk T.A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 363-394
46. Kohonen T. Self-organizing maps (1995), Springer, Berlin
47. Levesque H.J. Logic and the complexity of reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (1988) 355-389
48. Marcus G.F. Can connectionism save constructivism?. Cognition 66 (1998) 153-182
49. Marcus G.F. Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 37 (1998) 243-282
50. Marcus G.F. The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
51. Mayberry, M. R., Crocker, M. W., & Knoeferle, P. (in press). Learning to attend: A connectionist model of situated language comprehension. Cognitive Science.
52. McNamara P. Introduction. Philosophical Studies 71 (1993) 113-118
53. Miikkulainen R. Subsymbolic case-role analysis of sentences with embedded clauses. Cognitive Science 20 (1996) 47-73
54. Miikkulainen R., and Dyer M.G. Natural language processing with modular PDP networks and distributed lexicon. Cognitive Science 15 (1991) 343-399
55. Niklasson L.F., and van Gelder T. On being systematically connectionist. Mind & Language 9 (1994) 288-302
56. Parberry I. Circuit complexity and neural networks (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
57. Peirce C.S. Logic as semiotics: The theory of signs. In: Innis R.E. (Ed). Semiotics: An introductory anthology (1903/1985), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN 4-23
58. Phillips S. Are feedforward and recurrent networks systematic? Analysis and implications for a connectionist cognitive architecture. Connection Science 10 (1998) 137-160
59. Pollack J.B. Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence 46 (1990) 77-105
60. In: Pylyshyn Z.W. (Ed). The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in Artificial Intelligence (1987), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
61. Roth D. On the hardness of approximate reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 82 (1996) 273-302
62. Rumelhart D.E., Smolensky P., McClelland J.L., and Hinton G.E. Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: McClelland J.L., and Rumelhart D.E. (Eds). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition Vol. 1 (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
63. Šíma J. Back-propagation is not efficient. Neural Networks 9 (1996) 1017-1023
64. Simon H. The sciences of the artificial (1969/1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
65. Spivey M.J. The continuity of mind (2007), Oxford University Press, New York
66. Stanfield R.A., and Zwaan R.A. The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 153-156
67. Sterelny K. The representational theory of mind (1990), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
68. St.John M.F., and McClelland J.L. Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence 46 (1990) 217-257
69. Thelen E., and Smith L.B. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
70. van Gelder T. Compositionality: A connectionist variation on a classical theme. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 355-384
71. van Rooij I. The tractable cognition thesis. Cognitive Science 32 (2008) 939-984
72. van Rooij I., and Wareham T. Parameterized complexity in cognitive modeling: Foundations, applications and opportunities. Computer Journal 51 (2008) 385-404
73. Wilks Y. Some comments on Smolensky. In: Patridge D., and Wilks Y. (Eds). The foundations of AI (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 327-336
74. Zwaan R.A. The immersed experience: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In: Ross B. (Ed). The psychology of language and motivation Vol. 44 (2004), Academic Press, New York 35-62
75. Zwaan R.A., Stanfield R.A., and Yaxley R.H. Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 168-171