(De)facing the Self: Poststructural disruptions of the autoethnographic text

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 483-498

  de Freitas, Elizabeth ^a   Paton, Jillian ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auto ethnography; Deconstruction; Self; Testimony

Indexed keywords

EID: 59649108638     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800408318419     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, L. (2001). Autobiography. New York: Routledge.
2. Barone, T.E., & Blumenfeld-Jones, D.S. (1997). Interrupting the sign: The aesthetics of research texts. In J. A. Jipson & N. Paley (Eds.), Daredevil research: Re-creating analytic practice (pp. 83-107). New York: Peter Lang.
3. Barthes, R. (1977). Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes (R. Howard, Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1975)
4. Brown, T., & England, J. (2004). Revisiting emancipatory teacher research: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 67-79.
5. Burman, E. (2003). Narratives of "experience" and pedagogical practices. Narrative Inquiry, 13, 269-286.
6. Caputo, J.D., & Scanlon, M.J. (2005). Augustine and postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
8. Cole, A., & Knowles, G. (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
9. Cole, A., Knowles, G., & Neilsen, L. (Eds.). (2001). The art of writing inquiry. Halifax, NS: Backalong Books.
10. Cole, A., & McIntyre, M. (2004). Research as aesthetic contemplation: The role of the audience in research representation. Educational Insights, 9. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v09n01/articles/ cole.html
11. Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., Laws, C., Müller-Rockstroh, B., et al. (2004). The ambivalent practices of reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 360-389.
12. Davies, B., Dormer, S., Gannon, S., Laws, C., Taguchi, H.L., McCann, H., et al. (2001). Becoming schoolgirls: The ambivalent project of subjectification. Gender and Education, 13, 167-182.
13. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1965). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2003). The seventh moment of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Derrida, J. (1988). The ear of the other: Otobiography, transference, translation: Texts and discussions with Jacques Derrida. (C. Mcdonald, Ed.; P. Kamuff & A. Ronell, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1982)
16. de Man, P. (1979). Autobiography as de-facement. Modern Language Notes, 94, 919-930.
17. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
18. Ellis, C. (2007). Autoethnography: A panel discussion. Paper presented at the third annual Qualitative Inquiry Congress, Urbana-Champagne, IL.
19. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Felman, S. (1993). What does a woman want? Reading and sexual difference. Baltimore, WT: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Forster, A. (2002). Facing. Atlanta, GA: Nexus Press.
22. Freeman, M. (2003). Identity and difference. Narrative Inquiry, 13, 331-346.
23. Grosz, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. New York: Routledge.
24. Lacan, J. (2002). Ecrits: A selection (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1966)
25. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
26. Leggo, C. (2004). Tangled lines: On autobiography and poetic knowing. In A. L. Cole, L. Neilsen, J. G. Knowles, & T. C. Luciani (Eds.), Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed research (pp. 18-35). Halifax, NS: Backalong Books & The Centre for Arts-informed Research.
27. Maclure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
28. Peters, M., & Burbules, N. (2004). Poststructuralism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29. Rapaport, H. (2003). Later Derrida: Reading the recent work. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
30. Richardson, L. (2000). Writing. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. St. Pierre, E. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 403-417.
32. St. Pierre, E. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods ineducation. New York: Routledge.
33. Stronach, I., Garratt, D., Pearce, C., & Piper, H. (2007). Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 179-203.
34. Tarc, A.M. (2005). Education as humanism of the other. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 833-849.