Prosthetic laboratory influence on the vertical misfit at the implant/UCLA abutment interface

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 139-143

  Barbosa, Gustavo Augusto Seabra ^a   Simamoto Júnior, Paulo Cézar ^b   Fernandes Neto, Alfredo Júlio ^c   de Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello ^d   das Neves, Flávio Domingues ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Denture fitting; Implant supported dentures

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; IMPREGUM; LABORATORY; PROSTHESIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL SOLDERING; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; LABORATORIES, DENTAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 59649106913     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 18064760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000200010     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lewis SG, Beumer III J, Hornburg W, Moy P. The UCLAabutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:183-189.
2. Lewis SG. An overview of Bränemark System® restorative options. J Esthet Dent 1996;8 Suppl: 3-44.
3. Lewis SG, Avera S, Engleman M, Beumer III J. The restoration of improperly inclined osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:147-152.
4. Lewis SG, Llamas D, Avera S. The UCLA abutment: a fouryear review. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:509-515.
5. Aparicio C. A new method to routinely achieve passive fit of ceramometal prostheses over Bränemark osseointegrated implants: a two-year report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:405-419.
6. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-178.
7. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retainedimplant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
8. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-218.
9. Jemt T, Rubenstain JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:314-325.
10. Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BE. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:596-604.
11. Byrne D, Houston F, Cleary R, Claffey N. The fit of cast and premachined implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:184-192.
12. Carotenuto G, Palumbo M, Zarone F, Nicolais L. Characterization of the interface between prefabricated gold copings and cast dental alloy in implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:131-138.
13. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-728.
14. Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Eyssen H, van Steenberghe D. Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Bränemark system®. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:239-244.
15. Gross M, Abramovich I, Weiss EI. Microleakage at the abutment-implant interface of osseointegrated implants: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:94-100.
16. Carvalho MCA, Bondioli IR, Costa EMV, Nishioka RS, Bottino MA, Neisser MP. Fit microscope evaluation between implant and gold UCLA abutments and Teflon UCLA, casting in titanium and nickel-chromium-titanium. In vitro study. BCI 2002;9:105-110.
17. Neves FD, Panzeri H, Fernandes Neto AJ, Prado RA. Comparative study on the abutment/implant fit of seven differents systems. J Dent Res 2001;80:1031-1031.
18. Silveira Júnior CD, Fernandes Neto AJ, Neves FD, Franco SD, Mendonça G. Laboratory procedures influence in the implant/UCLA abutment fit - pilot study. PCL 2002;4:392-400.
19. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13.
20. Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Introduction in Osseointegration. In: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Brånemark PI., Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (Editors). Chicago: Quintessence Books; 1985.