Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 1: Is aneuploidy testing by PGD indicated for all infertile patients undergoing IVF?

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-5

  Harper, J C ^a   Repping, S ^b   Hill, D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c ART Reproductive Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOMERE; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 16; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME 22; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRYOPRESERVATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIPLOIDY; EMBRYO POLARITY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 59449110385     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2178     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. 1992. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 268(2): 240-248.
2. Baart E, Van Opstal D, Los FJ, Fauser BCJM, Martini E. 2004. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. Hum Reprod 19: 685-693.
3. Colls P, Escudero T, Zheng X, et al. 2007. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility through reanalysis of dubious signals. Fertil Steril 88: 53-61.
4. Debrock S, Melotte C, Vermeesch J, Spiessens C, Vanneste E, D'Hooghe TM. 2007. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy in embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not improve reproductive outcome in women over 35: a prospective controlled randomized study. Fertil Steril 88: S237.
5. Deugarte CM, Li M, Surrey M, Danzer H, Hill D, Decherney AH. 2008. Accuracy of FISH analysis in predicting chromosomal status in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 90: 1049-1054.
6. Garrisi GJ, Colls P, Ferry KM, Zheng X, Garrisi MG, Munné S. 2008. Effect of infertility, maternal age and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril In press.
7. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, et al. 2005. The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reprod Biomed Online 10(5): 633-640.
8. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, et al. 2008. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 23: 481-492.
9. Hardarson T, Hanson C, Lundin K, et al. 2008. Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 23: 2806-2812.
10. Harper JC, Die-Smulders C, Goossens V, et al. 2008. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection VII: cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005. Hum Reprod 23(4): 741-755.
11. Hassold T. 1986. Chromosome abnormalities in human reproduction. Trends Genet 2: 105-110.
12. Jansen RP, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ. 2008. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 23(7): 1476-1478.
13. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferrareti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. 2007. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosome complement. Fertil Steril 87: 534-541.
14. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Echten-Arends J, et al. 2007. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357(1): 9-17.
15. Mastenbroek S, Scriven P, Twisk M, et al. 2008. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? More randomized controlled trials needed? Hum Reprod 22: 2526-2628.
16. Mersereau JE, Pergament E, Zhang X, Milad MP. 2007. Preimplantation genetic screening to improve in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 90: 1287-1289.
17. Meyer LR, Hazlett D, Nasta T, Mangan P, Klipstein S, Karande V. 2006. Does pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improve cycle outcome in the "good-prognosis" patient? Fertil Steril 86: S72.
18. Munné S. 2009. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility (PGS). In Current Status of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), Harper JC (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Chapter 14, in press.
19. Munné S,Chen S,Fischer J, et al. 2005. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women 35 and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 84: 331-335.
20. Munné S, Fischer J, Warner A, Chen S, Zouves C, Cohen J, And referring centers PGD group. 2006. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: A Multi-center study. Fertil Steril 85: 326-332.
21. Munné S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I, et al. 2007a. Sub-standard application of PGS may interfere with its clinical success. Fertil Steril 88: 781-784.
22. Munné S, Serena C, Colls P, et al. 2007b. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 14: 628-634.
23. Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. 1993. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 8(12): 2185-2191.
24. Munné S, Magli C, Cohen J, et al. 1999. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod 14: 2191-2199.
25. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, et al. 2003. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 7: 91 -97.
26. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, et al. 2004. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 19(12): 2849-2858.
27. Staessen C, Verpoest W, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I, Devroey P. 2007. Does PGS improve pregnancy rates in young patients with single-embryo transfer? Hum Reprod 22: i31-i33.
28. Stevens J, Wale P, Surrey ES, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. 2004. Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial? A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 82: S249.
29. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, et al. 1995. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 10(7): 1923-1927.
30. Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S, et al. 2004. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 82(2): 302-303.
31. Wells D, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. 2008. High pregnancy rate after comprehensive chromosomal screening of blastocysts. Fertil Steril 23(11): 2596-2608.