Textual, genre and social features of spoken grammar: A corpus-based approach

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 40-58

  Pérez Llantada, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59449109878     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in Ll and L2. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Alarcos-Llorac, E. (1994). Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica, 4, 3-19.
5. Biber, D. (2003). Variation among university spoken and written registers: A new multi-dimensional analysis. In Leistyna P. & C.F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use (pp. 47-70). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
6. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
7. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
8. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
9. Breivega, K.R., Dalh, T., & FlØttum, K. (2002). Traces of self and others in research articles: A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 218-239.
10. Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1-47.
11. Charles, M. (2007). Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 289-302.
12. Cortes V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423.
13. Flowerdew, J. (2003). Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 329-346.
14. Gilquin, G., Granger, S. & Paquot, M. (2007). Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 6(4), 319-335.
15. Granger, S. (Ed.) (1998). Learner English on computer. New York: Longman.
16. Granger, S. and Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.) (2003). Extending the scope of corpus-based research: New applications, new challenges. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
17. Hadley, G. (2004). Sensing the winds of change: An introduction to data-driven learning. Retrieved December 17, 2008, from http://www.nuis.ac. jp/~hadley/publication/windofchange/windsofchange.htm.
18. Hewings, M. (Ed.) (2001). Academic writing in context: Implications and applications. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham Press.
19. Hunston, S. (2002). Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation: Applications of a corpus-driven grammar. In R. Reppen, S.M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 167-183). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
21. Johns, A.M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of datadriven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 293-313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
24. Mauranen, A. (2001). Reflexive academic talk: Observations from MICASE. In R. C. Simpson, & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 symposium (pp. 165-178). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
25. Neff, J., Ballesteros, F., Dafouz, E., Martínez, F. & Rica, J.P. (2004). The expression of writer stance in native and non-native argumentative texts. In R. Facchinetti & F. Palmer (Eds.), English modality in perspective (pp. 141-161). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
26. Neff, J., Ballesteros, F., Dafouz, E., Martínez, F. & Rica, J.P. (2007). A contrastive functional analysis of errors in Spanish EFL university writers' argumentative texts: Corpus-based study. In E. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Corpus linguistics beyond the word: Corpus research from phrase to discourse (pp. 203-225). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
27. Neumann, C.P. (2006). The complex dynamics of faculty-student relations in dialogic academic speech events: The research group meeting. In C. Pérez-Llantada, & G. Ferguson (Eds.), English as a gloCalization phenomenon. Observations from a linguistic microcosm (pp. 25-44). Valencia: Prensas Universitarias.
28. Paltridge, B. (2002). Academic literacies and changing university communities. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 44, 15-28.
29. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2006). Learning to speak. Speaking to learn. Research perspectives on learner autonomy through collaborative work in ELT. In S. Borg (Ed.), Language teacher research in Europe (pp. 81-94). Alexandria, VA: TESOL (Language Teacher Research Series).
30. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2007). New trends in grammar teaching: Issues and applications. An interview with Prof. Diane Larsen-Freeman. Atlantis, 29(1), 157-163.
31. Pérez-Llantada, C. & Ferguson, G.R. (2006). English as a gloCalization phenomenon. Observations from a linguistic microcosm. Valencia: Prensas Universitarias.
32. Poos, D., & Simpson, R. (2002). Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 3-23). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Reppen, R., Fitzmaurice, S.M., & Biber, D. (Eds.) (2002) Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 3-23). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
34. Simpson, R.C., Briggs, S.L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J.M. (1999). The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
35. Simpson, R.C., & Leicher, S. (2006). The MICASE handbook. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
36. Simpson, R.C., & Swales, J.M. (2001). Corpus linguistics in North America. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
37. Stevens, V. (1991). Concordance-based vocabulary exercises. A viable alternative to gap-filling. English Language Research Journal, 4, 47-61.
38. Swales, J.M. (2001). Metatalk in American academic talk: The cases of point and thing. Journal of English Linguistics, 29, 34-54.
39. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
40. Tucker, G.H. (1998). The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A systemic functional approach to lexis. London and New York: Cassell.