Open vs specific questioning during anaesthetic follow-up after Caesarean section

Anaesthesia

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 156-160

  Nguyen, T ^a   Slater, P ^b   Cyna, A M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRURITUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; METHODOLOGY; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PRURITUS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59449108060     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05734.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Smith AF, Pope C, Goodwin D, Mort M. Communication between anesthesiologists, patients and the anesthesia team: a descriptive study of induction and emergence. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 52: 915-20.
2. Cyna AM, Andrew MI. Communication Skills for Anaesthetists. Australian Anaesthesia Melbourne: ANZCA, 2007: 95-100 http://www.anzca.edu.au/ resources/books-and-publications/australasian-anaesthesia-2007/Cyna.pdf (accessed 16 August 2008).
3. Egbert AM, Battit GE, Welch CE, Bartlett MK. Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients. New England Journal of Medicine 1964; 270: 825-7.
4. Carlyle AV, Ching PC, Cyna AM. Communication during induction of paediatric anaesthesia: an observational study. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2008; 36: 180-4.
5. Bejenke CJ. Obstetrics. In: Barber J, ed. Hypnosis and Suggestion in the Treatment of Pain: A Clinical Guide. London: WW Norton, 1996: 250-5.
6. Paterick TJ, Carson GV, Allen MC, Paterick TE. Medical informed consent: general considerations for physicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2008; 83: 313-9.
7. Lang EV, Hatsiopoulou O, Koch T, et al. Can words hurt? Patient-provider interactions during invasive procedures Pain 2005; 114: 303-9.
8. Dutt-Gupta J, Bown T, Cyna AM. Effect of communication on pain during intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007; 99: 871-5.
9. Benedetti F, Lanotte M, Lopiano L, Colloca L. When words are painful: unraveling the mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Neuroscience 2007; 147: 260-71.
10. Pickering E, Holdcroft A. Pain relief after Caesarean section. In: Kinsella M, ed. Raising the standard: A compendium of audit recipes, 2nd edn. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2006 http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/ ARB-section8.pdf (accessed 16 August 2008).