Medical informed consent: General considerations for physicians

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 313-319

  Paterick, Timothy J ^a   Carson, Geoff V ^b   Allen, Marjorie C ^a   Paterick, Timothy E ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT RIGHT; REVIEW;

EID: 41549102100     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4065/83.3.313     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Schloendorff v the Society of the New York Hospital, 211 NY 125 105 NE 92 1914 LEXIS 1028 (1914).
2. Grable & Sons Metal Products v Darue Engineering & Manufacturing 125 S Ct 2363 2370 (2005).
3. Merz JF, Fischhoff B. Informed consent does not mean rational consent: cognitive limitations on decision-making. J Leg Med. 1990;11(3):321-350.
4. Morgan MG. Probing the question of technology-induced risk. IEEE Spectrum. 1981;18(11):58-64.
5. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982: 3350-3360.
6. Jackson v Julian, 694 SW 2d 434 (Tex App -Dallas 1985).
7. Walstad v University of Minnesota Hospital, 442 F2d 634 (8th Cir 1971).
8. Ditto v McCurdy, 510 F3d 1070, 1078 (9th Cir 2007).
9. Baylor Medical University Medical Center v Biggs, 237 SW3d 909, 922 (Tex App 2007).
10. Hill v Medlantic Health Care Group, 933 A 2d 314, 330 (DC App 2007).
11. Miller-McGee v Washington Hospital Center, 920 A2d 430, 439 (DC App 2007).
12. Gorney v Meaney, 150 P2d 799, 804 (Az App Div 2 2007).
13. Kuperstein v Hoffman-Laroche, Inc, 457 F Supp 472, 473 (SD NY 2006).
14. Ardoin v McKay, 939 So2d 698, 705 (La App 3d Cir 2006).
15. Saks v Ng, 890 A2d 983, 992-993 (NJ App 2006).
16. Sherwood v Carter, 805 P2d 452, 463 (Idaho 1991).
17. Gassman v United States, 589 F Supp 1534, 1545 (MD Fla 1984).
18. Keeton WP, Prosser WL, eds. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts. 5th ed. St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company; 1984.
19. Madare v Ochsner Foundation Hospital, 505 So 2d 146 (La Ct App 1987).
20. Canterbury v Spence, 464 F2d 772 (CADC 1972).
21. Cowman v Hornaday, 329 NW 2d 422 (Iowa 1983).
22. Meisel A. The "exceptions" to the informed consent doctrine: striking a balance between competing values in medical decision making. Wis L Rev. 1979;1979(2):413-488.
23. Banks v Wittenberg, 266 NW 2d 788 82 Mich App 274 (Mich App 1978).
24. Carnerie F. Crisis and informed consent: analysis of a law-medicine malocclusion. Am J Law Med. 1987;12(1):55-97.
25. Shafford v Louisiana State University, 448 So 2d 852 (La Ct App 1984).
26. Kissinger v Lofgren, 836 F 2d 678 (CA 1 [Mass] 1987).
27. Maldonado JE. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so!" Akron Law Rev. 1976 Spring;9(4):609-628.
28. Stansfield MP. Malpractice: toward a viable decision standard for informed consent. Oklahoma Law Rev. 1979 Fall;32(4):868-890.
29. Cobbs v Grant, 8 Cal 3d 229 502 P2d 1 (Cal 1972).
30. Moore v Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal 3d D20 165 793. P 2d 479 291 Cal Rptr 147 note 41 (1990).
31. Hanson L. Informed consent and the scope of a physician's duty to disclose. N D Law Rev. 2001;77:71.
32. Demers v Gerety, 85 NM 641 515 P 2d 645 (1972).
33. Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes. Decision-making capacity. Minn Stat 145C 01 subd 1b.
34. Karp v Cooley, 349 F Supp 827 (SD Tex 1972) aff'd 493 F2d 408 (5th Cir 1974) cert denied 419 US 845 (1974).
35. Parikh v Cunningham, 493 So 2d 999 11 FL L. Weekly 309 (Fla, 1986).
36. Tarasoff v Regents of U of California, 131 Cal Rptr 24 20 551 P2d 334 340 (1976).
37. Annas GJ. Control of tuberculosis - the law and the public's health. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):585-588.
38. Harper F, James T. The Law of Torts (1968 Supp.) sec 17.1, 61; 1968.
39. Rogers v TJ Samson Community Hospital, 276 F 3d 228 (6 Cir 2002).
40. Agard A, Herlitz J, Hermeren G. Obtaining informed consent from patients in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: physicians' experiences and attitudes [letter]. Heart. 2004;90(2):208-210.
41. Yuval R, Halon DA, Merdler A, et al. Patient comprehension and reaction to participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial (ISIS-4) in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1142-1146.
42. Schats R, Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, Van Gijn J. Informed consent in trials for neurological emergencies: the example of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(7):988-991.
43. Schwartz B. The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York, NY: Ecco; 2004.