Aging in the context of cancer prevention and control perspectives from behavioral medicine

Cancer

Volumn 113, Issue 12 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 3479-3483

  Bellizzi, Keith M ^a,b   Mustian, Karen M ^c   Bowen, Deborah J ^d   Resnick, Barbara ^e   Miller, Suzanne M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^f FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMORBIDITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELDERLY CARE; EMOTIONALITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GERIATRICS; GERONTOLOGY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPICE CARE; HUMAN; LIVING WILL; MENTAL STRESS; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PHYSICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SURVIVAL TIME; WELLBEING;

AGED; AGING; BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 59449103013     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and The Merck Company Foundation. The State of Aging and Health in America 2007. Whitehouse Station, NJ: The Merck Company Foundation; 2007. Available at www.cdc.gov/aging and www.merck.com/cr. Accessed on October 25, 2007.
2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Prevalence Database: ''US Estimated Complete Prevalence Counts on 1/1/2004.'' Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program, Statistical Research and Applications Branch; released April 2007, based on the November 2006 SEER data submission. Available at:www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed on October 25, 2007.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2007.
4. Robison L. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a resource for research of long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood cancer. Minn Med. 2005;88:45-49.
5. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, et al. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10:19-28.
6. Yancik R, Havlik RJ, Wesley MN, et al. Cancer and comorbidity in older patients: a descriptive profile. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:399-412.
7. Extermann M. Interaction between comorbidity and cancer. Cancer Control. 2007;14:13-22.
8. Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:82-91.
9. Bellizzi KM, Rowland JH. The role of comorbidity, symptoms and age in the health of older survivors following treatment for cancer. J Aging Health. 2007;3:625-635
10. Boss GR, Seegmiller JE. Age-related physiological changes and their clinical significance. West J Med. 1981;135:434-440.
11. Baltes PB, Baltes MM. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: a model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, eds. Successful Aging: Perspectives From the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990:1-34.
12. Cartensen LL. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol Aging. 1992;7:331-338.
13. Whitbourne SK. The Aging Individual: Physical and Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1996.
14. Balducci L. Aging, frailty, and chemotherapy. Cancer Control. 2007;14:7-12.
15. Hurria A. Clinical trials in older adults with cancer: past and future. Oncology. 2007;21:351-358.
16. Brandtstaedter J, Renner G. Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication of age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;65:58-67.
17. Lockenhoff CE, Cartensen LL. Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. J Pers. 2004;72:1395-1424.
18. Bellizzi KM, Blank TO. Social comparison processes in autobiographies of adult cancer survivors. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:777-786.
19. Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Ries LAG, et al. Multiple cancer prevalence: a growing challenge in long-term survivorship. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:566-571.
20. Tomaka J, Thompson S, Palacios R. The relation of social isolation, loneliness and social support to disease outcomes among the elderly. J Aging Health. 2006;18:359-384.
21. Emanuel L, Alexander C, Arnold RM, et al. Integrating palliative care into disease management guidelines. J Palliat Med. 2004;7:774-783.
22. Emanuel L, Alpert H, Baldwin D, et al. What terminally ill patients care about: toward a validated construct of patients' perspective. J Palliat Med. 2000;3:419-431.
23. Sanderman R, Coyne JC, Ranchor A. Age: a nuisance variable to be eliminated with statistical control or important concern? Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:315-316.
24. Greenfield S, Blanco DM, Elashoff RE, et al. Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. JAMA. 1987; 257:2766-2770.
25. Hurria A, Lachs MS, Cohen HJ, et al. Geriatric assessment for oncologists: rationale and future directions. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006;59:211-217.
26. Cohen HJ, Harris T, Pieper CF. Coagulation and activation of inflammatory pathways in the development of functional decline and mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 2003;114:180-187.
27. Ferrucci L, Corsi A, Lauretani F, et al. The origins of agerelated proinflammatory state. Blood. 2005;105:2294-2299.
28. Institute of Medicine. Cancer in Elderly People: Workshop Proceedings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
29. Lichtman SM, Balducci L, Aapro M. Geriatric oncology: a field coming of age. JClin Oncol. 2007;25:1821-1823.
30. Nelson W, Stefanek M, Peters E, et al. Basic and applied decision making in cancer control. Health Psychol. 2005; 24:S3-S8.
31. Miller SM, Stefanek ME, Bowen DJ, et al. Decision making in the cancer context: an introduction to the special series. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32:169-171.
32. Miller SM, Bowen D, Lyle J, et al. Primary prevention, aging, and cancer: overview and future perspectives. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3484-3492.
33. Sheinfeld Gorin S, Gauthier J, Hay J, Miles A, Wardle J. Cancer screening and aging: research barriers and opportunities. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3493-3504.
34. Given B, Given CW. Older adults and cancer treatment. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3505-3511.
35. Trask PC, Blank TO, Jacobsen PB. Future perspectives on the treatment issues associated with cancer and aging. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3512-3518.
36. Avis NE, Deimling GT. Cancer survivorship and aging. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3519-3529.
37. Bellizzi KM, Mustian KM, Palesh OG, Diefenbach M. Cancer survivorship and aging: moving the science forward. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3530-3539.
38. Saraiya B, Bodnar-Deren S, Leventhal E, Leventhal H. End-of-life planning and its relevance for patients and oncologists' decisions in choosing cancer therapy. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3540-3547.
39. Reitschuler Cross E, Emanuel L. Providing inbuilt economic resilience options: an obligation of comprehensive cancer care. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3548-3555.
40. Peters E, Diefenbach M, Hess TM, Vastfjall D. Age differences in 2 information-processing modes: implications for cancer decision making. Cancer. 2008;113 (12 suppl):3557-3567.