Multifunctional in situ photopolymerized semi-interpenetrating network system is an effective donor site dressing: A cross comparison study in a swine model

Journal of Burn Care and Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 37-45

  Kleinbeck, Kyle R ^a   Faucher, Lee ^b   Kao, Weiyuan John ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN GLUE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BURN DRESSING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIZATION; NONHUMAN; SEMI INTERPENETRATING NETWORK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; WOUND; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BURNS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FIBRIN TISSUE ADHESIVE; INFLAMMATION; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; PHENOLS; POLYESTERS; POLYETHYLENES; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SWINE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 59449090855     PISSN: 1559047X     EISSN: 15590488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181921f98     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ayello EA. New evidence for an enduring wound-healing concept: moisture control. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006;33(Suppl 6):S1-S2.
2. Brett DW. A review of moisture-control dressings in wound care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006;33(Suppl 6): S3-S8.
3. Stevens KR, Einerson NJ, Burmania JA, Kao WJ. In vivo biocompatibility of gelatin-based hydrogels and interpenetrating networks. J Biomater Sci 2002;13:1353-66.
4. Waldeck H, Chung AS, Kao WJ. Interpenetrating polymer networks containing gelatin modified with PEGylated RGD and soluble KGF: synthesis, characterization, and application in in vivo critical dermal wound. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 82:861-71.
5. Einerson NJ, Stevens KR, Kao WJ. Synthesis and physico-chemical analysis of gelatin-based hydrogels for drug carrier matrices. Biomaterials 2002;24:509-23.
6. Witte RP, Blake AJ, Palmer C, Kao WJ. Analysis of poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate macromer polymerization within a multicomponent semi-interpenetrating polymer network system. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;71:508-18.
7. Phillips J, Kao WJ. Macrophage adhesion on gelatin-based interpenetrating networks grafted with PEGylated RGD. Tissue Eng 2005;11:964-73.
8. Sawhney AS, Pathak CP, Hubbell JA. Interfacial photopoly-merization of poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels upon alginate-poly(l-lysine) microcapsules for enhanced biocompatibility. Biomaterials 1993;14:1008-16.
9. Elias P. The skin as an innate immune element. Semin Immunopathol 2007;29:3-14.
10. Zhu K, Carrougher G, Gibran N, Isik FF, Engrav L. Review of the female Duroc/Yorkshire pig model of human fibro-proliferative scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15: S32-S39.
11. Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn K, Orton C, Ferguson M. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1954-61.
12. Kunii T, Hirao R, Kikuchi K, Tagami H. Stratum corneum lipid profile and maturation pattern of corneocytes in the outermost layer of fresh scars: the presence of immature corneocytes plays a much more important role in the barrier dysfunction than do changes in intercellular lipids. Br J Dermatol 2003;149:749-56.
13. Clark RA. Cutaneous tissue repair: basic biologic considerations. I. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;13(5 Pt l):701-25.
14. Harunari N, Zhu K, Armendariz R, et al. Histology of the thick scar on the female, red Duroc pig: final similarities to human hypertrophic scar. Burns 2006;32:669-77.