A review of moisture-control dressings in wound care

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 33, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2006, Pages

  Brett, D W ^a  

^a Smith and Nephew Research Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BANDAGE; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; PAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; WOUND HEALING;

BANDAGES; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL; HUMANS; PAIN; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 34548643276     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.WON.0000278581.53694.b6     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Vogt P, Andre C, Breuing K, et al. Dry, moist and wet skin wound repair. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34(5):493-500.
2. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293-294.
3. Breuing K, Eriksson E, Liu PY. Healing of partial thickness porcine skin wounds in a liquid environment. J Surg Res. 1992; 52:50-58.
4. Bolton LL, Monte K, Pirone LA. Moisture and healing: beyond the jargon. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000;46(Suppl 1A): 51S-62S.
5. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and reepithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res. 1983;35:142-148. (Pubitemid 14226831)
6. Jonkman MF, Hooksman ESA, Nieuwenhuls P. Accelerated epithelialization under a highly vapor-permeable wound dressing is associated with increased precipitation of fibrin(ogen) and fibronectin. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;94:477-484. (Pubitemid 20123925)
7. Brown H. Wound healing research through the ages. In: Cohen IK, Diegelmann RF, Lindblad WJ, eds. Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1986;57-67.
8. Hebra FV. Ueuber Continuirliche Allgemeine Baeder und Deren Anwendung bei Bahendlung von Verbannungen. Allgemeine Weiner Medizinsche Zeitung. 1861;6:351-352.
9. Jonkman MF. Epidermal Wound Healing Between Moist and Dry. Groningen: Thesis Rijksuniversiteit: 1989.
10. Jonkman MF, Bruin P, Hoeksma EA. A clot-inducing wound covering with high vapour permeability enhances effects on epidermal wound healing in partial thickness wounds in guinea pigs. Surgery. 1988;104:537-545.
11. Hutchinson JJ, Lawrence JC. Wound infection under occlusive dressings. J Hosp Infect. 1991;17:83-94.
12. Hutchinson JJ, McGuckin M. Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. Am J Infect Control. 1990;18:257-268. (Pubitemid 20290242)
13. Hutchinson JJ. Prevalence of wound infection under occlusive dressings: a collective survey of reported research. Wounds. 11989;1:123-133.
14. Zitelli J. Secondary intention healing: an alternative to surgical repair. Clin Dermatol. 1984;2:92-106.
15. Michie DD, Hugill JV. Influence of occlusive and impregnated gauze dressings on incisional healing: a prospective randomized, controlled study. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:57-64. (Pubitemid 24028984)
16. Hein NT, Prawer SE, Katz HI. Facilitated wound healing using transparent film dressings following Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:903-906.
17. Kurzuk-Howard G, Simpson L, Palmieri A. Decubitus ulcer care: a comparative study. West J Nurs Res. 1985;7:58-79.
18. Silverman RA, Lender J, Elmets CA. Effects of occlusive and semi-occlusive dressings on the return of barrier function to transepidermal water loss in standardized human wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20:755-760. (Pubitemid 19127911)
19. Pirone L, Monte K, Shannon R, Bolton L. Wound healing under occlusion and non-occlusion in partial-thickness and full-thickness wounds in swine. Wounds. 1990;2:74-81.
20. Pirone L, Bolton L, Monte K, Shannon R. Effect of calcium alginate dressings on partial-thickness wounds in swine. J Invest Surg. 1992;5:149-153.
21. Ruiz AR. Case study of the use of two combined moist wound healing dressings in the treatment of a chronic diabetic foot ulcer. Revista ROL de Enfermeria. 1998;242:9-12.
22. Genecov DG, Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, Parker D, White WL, Argenta LC. A controlled sub-atmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;400:219-225. (Pubitemid 28106901)
23. Bolton L, van Rijswijk L. Wound dressings: meeting clinical and biological needs. Dermatol Nurs. 1991;148:161.
24. McGuckin M, Stineman M, Goin J, Williams S. Draft guideline: diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1996;42(4):48-78.
25. Rovee DT, Kurowsky CA, Labun J, Downes AM. Effect of local wound environment on epidermal healing. In: Maibaich HI, Rovee DT, eds. Epidermal Wound Healing. Chicago, Ill: Yearbook Publishers; 1972:159-184.
26. Madden M, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL, et al. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressings and the effects of wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma. 1982;29(7): 924-930.
27. Lydon M, Hutchinson JJ, Rippon M. Dissolution of wound coagulum and promotion of granulation tissue under Duo- Derm. Wounds. 1989;1(2):95-106.
28. Kantnor J, Margolis DJ. Efficacy and prognostic value of simple wound measurements. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1571-1574. (Pubitemid 29009258)
29. van Rijswijk L, Polansky M. Predictors of time to healing deep pressure ulcers. Wounds. 1994;6(5):159-165.
30. van Rijswijk L and the Multi-center Leg Ulcer Study Group. Full-thickness leg ulcers: patient demographics and predictors of healing. J Fam Pract. 1993;36(6):625-632. (Pubitemid 23173278)
31. Field CK, Kerstein MD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg. 1994;167(1A):2DS-6S.
32. Xakellis G, Chrischilles EA. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effective analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:463-469.
33. Reig A, Tejerina C, Codina J, Hidalgo J, Miraber V. Application of a new cicatrization dressing in treating second degree burns and donor sites. Annals of the Mediterranean Burns Club. 1991; 4(3):174-176.
34. Ohlsson P, Larsson K, Lindholm C, Moller M. A costeffectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994;12:295-299.
35. Loiterman DA, Byers PH. Effect of a hydrocellular polyurethane dressing on chronic venous ulcer healing. Wounds. 1991;3(5): 178-181.
36. Martini L, Reali UM, Borgognoni L, Brandani P, Andreisses A. Comparison of two dressings in the management of partialthickness donor sites. J Wound Care. 1999;8(9):457-450.
37. Berry DP, Bale S, Harding K. Dressings for treating cavity wounds. J Wound Care. 1996;5(1):10-13.
38. Bale S, Squires D, Vamon T, Walker A, Benbow M, Harding KG. A comparison of two dressings in pressure sore management. J Wound Care. 1997;6(10):463-466.
39. Bale S, Haglstoin S, Banks V, Harding K. Costs of dressings in the community. J Wound Care. 1998;7(7):327-330.
40. Harding K, Bale S, Banks V, Orpin J. A cost-effectiveness study using Allevyn hydrocellular dressings. Poster presentation at: 4th European Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1994; Copenhagen.
41. Banks V, Bale S, Harding K, Harding EF. Evaluation of a new polyurethane foam dressing. J Wound Care. 1997;6(6):266-269.
42. Banks V, Harding K. Comparing two dressings for exuding pressure sores in community patients. J Wound Care. 1994;3(4): 175-178.
43. Banks V, Bale S, Harding K. The use of two dressings for moderately exuding pressure sores. J Wound Care. 1994;3(3):132-134.
44. Viamontes L, Temple D, Wytall D, Walker A. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(8):48-58.
45. Kurring PA, Roberts CD, Quinlan D. Evaluation of a hydrocellular dressing in the management of exuding wounds in the community. Br J Nurs. 1994;3(20):1049-1053.