How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery?

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1089-1093

  Sharifi, A ^a   Jones, R ^a   Ayoub, A ^a   Moos, K ^a   Walker, F ^a   Khambay, B ^a   McHugh, S ^a  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

articulator; model surgery; orthognathic surgery; osteotomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HUMAN; MANDIBLE RESECTION; MAXILLA; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; DENTAL ARTICULATORS; DENTAL MODELS; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INCISOR; JAW; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NASAL BONE; OSTEOTOMY; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PALATE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROGNATHISM;

EID: 59349101866     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bailey J.O., and Nowlin T.P. Accuracy of Frankfort plane transfer of the Hanau articulator. J Dent Res 60 (1981) 531
2. Bamber M.A., Firouzai R., Harris M., and Linney A.D. A comparative study of two arbitrary face bow transfer systems for orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25 (1996) 339-343
3. Boucher L., and Jacoby J. Posterior border movement of the human mandible movements. J Pros Dent 11 (1961) 836
4. Bowley J.F., Michaels G.C., Lai T.W., and Lin P.P. Reliability of face bow transfer procedure. J Pros Dent 67 (1992) 491-498
5. Dahlberg G. Statistical method for medical and biological students (1940), Interscience New York
6. Donatsky O., Hillerup S., Jorgensen J.B., and Jacobsen P.U. Computerised cephalometric orthognathic surgical simulation, prediction and postoperative evaluation of precision. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21 (1992) 199-203
7. Ellis E., Tharanon W., and Gambrell K. Accuracy of face bow transfer: Effects on surgical prediction and post surgical result. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 (1992) 562-567
8. Fonseca RJ. Oral Maxillofac Surg. Saunders: Philadelphia, 2nd Vol. 2000, Chapter 5, p. 98.
9. Gateno J., Forrest K.K., and Camp B. A comparison of three methods of face bow transfer recording: Implication for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 (2001) 635-640
10. Ghafari J., Engel F.E., and Laster L.L. Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: A review and a comparison of four methods. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthopod 91 (1987) 403-413
11. Gold B.R., and Setchell D.J. An investigation of the reproducibility of face bow transfer. J Oral Rehab 10 (1983) 495-503
12. Helkimo M., Ingervall B., and Carlsson G.E. Variation of retruded and muscular position of mandible under recording conditions. Acta Odonto Scand 29 (1971) 423-427
13. Loh S., and Yow M. Computer prediction of hard tissue profile in orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Ortho Orthognat Surg 17 (2002) 342-347
14. Lotzmann U. Considerations of precision and consistence of mandibular transverse hinge axis. Zentrum fur Zahn-Mund-und Kieferheilkunde 99 (1990), der Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen p. 372-379
15. McMillan L.B. Border movements of human mandible. J Pros Dent 27 (1972) 524
16. O'Malley M.A., and Milosevic A. Comparison of three face bow/semi adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38 (2000) 185-190