Robotic Arm-Assisted Unicompartmental Arthroplasty

Seminars in Arthroplasty JSES

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 15-22

  Lonner, Jess H ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

arthroplasty; robotic arm; unicompartmental

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LIFESTYLE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION; ROBOTICS; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 59349096113     PISSN: 10454527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2008.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Berend K.R., Lombardi Jr. A.V., and Adams J.B. Obesity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: Identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States. Orthopedics 30 suppl (2007) 19-23
2. Berend K.R., Lombardi Jr. A.V., Mallory T.H., et al. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435 (2005) 171-180
3. Borus T., and Thornhill T. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15 (2007) 9-18
4. Cobb J., Henckel J., Gomes P., et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 188-197
5. Collier M.B., Eickmann T.H., Sukezaki F., et al. Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 suppl (2006) 108-115
6. Fisher D.A., Watts M., and Davis K.E. Implant position in knee surgery: A comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18 suppl (2003) 2-8
7. Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., et al. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 suppl (2006) 98-107
8. Hernigou P., and Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423 (2004) 161-165
9. Hernigou P., and Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 506-511
10. Keene G., Simpson D., and Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88B (2006) 44-48
11. Kozinn S.C., and Scott R.D. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71A (1989) 145-150
12. Pennington D.W., Swienckowski J.J., Lutes W.B., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A (2003) 1968-1973
13. Romanowski M.R., and Repicci J.A. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: Eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15 (2002) 17-22
14. Schai P.A., Suh J.T., Thornhill T.S., et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle aged patients: A two-six years follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 365-372