Conservation planning for successional landscapes

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 220, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 438-450

  Drechsler, Martin ^a   Lourival, Reinaldo ^b,c   Possingham, Hugh P ^b  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c Ministry of Education Brazil   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Conservation; Correlation; Directionality; Disturbance; Heterogeneity; Planning; Probabilistic model; Reserve; Site selection; Succession

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; CONSERVATION; CORRELATION METHODS; DYNAMICS; PROGRAMMING THEORY; STOCHASTIC MODELS; TARGETS;

ADEQUACY; CORRELATION; DIRECTIONALITY; DISTURBANCE; HETEROGENEITY; PLANNING; PROBABILISTIC MODEL; RESERVE; SUCCESSION;

SITE SELECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; HETEROGENEITY; NATURE RESERVE; PROBABILITY; SITE SELECTION; SUCCESSION; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 59149094749     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arponen A., Kondelin H., and Moilanen A. Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach. Conservation Biology 21 (2007) 527-533
2. Balmford A., Mace G.M., and Ginsberg J.R. The challenges to conservation in a changing world: putting processes on the map. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A., and Ginsberg J. (Eds). Conservation in a Changing World (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1-28
3. Bengtsson J., Angelstam P., Elmqvist T., Emanuelsson U., Folke C., Ihse M., Moberg F., and Nyström M. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32 (2003) 389-396
4. Burgman M.A., Ferson S., and Akcakaya H.R. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology (1992), Chapman & Hall, London, Melbourne
5. Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss. Conservation Biology 17 (2003) 1402-1413
6. Clements F.E. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation (1916), Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington
7. Frank K., and Wissel C. Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival: from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management. Landscape Ecology 13 (1998) 363-379
8. Franklin J., Syphard A.D., He H.S., and Mladenoff D.J. Altered fire regimes affect landscape patterns of plant succession in the foothills and mountains of Southern California. Ecosystems 8 (2005) 885-898
9. Gerber L.R., Botsford L.W., Hastings A., Possingham H.P., Gaines S.D., Palumbi S.R., and Andelman S. Population models for marine reserve design: a retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecological Applications 13 (2003) 47-64
10. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
11. Heckman C.W. The seasonal succession of biotic communities in wetlands of the tropical wet-and-dry climatic zone: V. Aquatic invertebrate communities in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. International Review of Hydrobiology 83 (1998) 31-63
12. Horn H.S. Ecology and evolution of communities. In: Cody M.L., and Diamon J.M. (Eds). Markovian Properties of Forest Succession (1975), Belknap Press, Cambridge 196-211
13. Huth A., and Johst K. Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis: when will there be two peaks of diversity?. Diversity and Distributions 11 (2005) 111-120
14. Johst K., and Drechsler M. Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species?. Oikos 103 (2003) 449-456
15. Junk W.J. The flood pulse concept of large rivers: learning from the tropics. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie (1999) 261-280
16. Kallimanis A.S., Kunin W.E., Halley J.M., and Sgardelis S.P. Metapopulation extinction risk under spatially autocorrelated disturbance. Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 534-546
17. Keane R.E., Cary G.J., Davies I.D., Flannigan M.D., Gardner R.H., Lavorel S., Lenihan J.M., Li C., and Rupp T.S. A classification of landscape fire succession models: spatial simulations of fire and vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 179 (2004) 3-27
18. Klinger L.F. The myth of the classic hydrosere model of bog succession. Arctic and Alpine Research 28 (1996) 1-9
19. Köhler P., and Huth A. Impacts of recruitment limitation and canopy disturbance on tropical tree species richness. Ecological Modelling 203 (2007) 511-517
20. Laska G. The disturbance and vegetation dynamics: a review and an alternative framework. Plant Ecology 157 (2001) 77-99
21. Lourival, R., 2008. Applications and implications of systematic planning for the Pantanal wetland Biosphere reserve in Brazil. PhD Thesis presented to the University of Queensland.
22. Lourival, R., Drechsler, M., Watts, M., Game, E., Possingham, H.P. Planning for reserve adequacy in dynamic landscapes, a study based on flood disturbances and succession in the Pantanal, in review.
23. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
24. McCarthy M.A., and Lindenmayer D.B. Incorporating metapopulation dynamics of Greater Gliders into reserve design in disturbed landscapes. Ecology 80 (1999) 651-667
25. Naiman R.J., and Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28 (1997) 621-658
26. Pickett S.T.A., and White P.S. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (1985), Academic Press, New York
27. Possingham H.P., Ball I.R., and Andelman S. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S., and Burgman M.A. (Eds). Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York 291-305
28. Possingham H.P., Franklin J., Wilson K., and Regan T.J. The roles of spatial heterogeneity and ecological processes in conservation planning. In: Lovett G.M., Turner M.G., and Weathers K.C. (Eds). Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes (2006), Springer-Verlag, NY
29. Pressey R.L., Carbeza M., Watts M.E., Cowling R.M., and Wilson K.A. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22 (2007) 583-592
30. Richards S.A., Possingham H.P., and Tizard J. Optimal fire management for maintaining community diversity. Ecological Applications 9 (1999) 880-892
31. Rondinini C., Wilson K.A., Boitani L., Grantham H., and Possingham H.P. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecology Letters 9 (2006) 1136-1145
32. Sousa W.P. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15 (1984) 353-391
33. Sparks R.E., Bayley P.B., Kohler S.L., and Osborne L.L. Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers. Environmental Management 14 (1990) 699-709
34. Sprugel D.G. Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability-what is natural vegetation in a changing environment. Biological Conservation 58 (1991) 1-18
35. Sturtevant B.R., Gustavson E.J., Li W., and He H.S. Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm. Ecological Modelling 180 (2004) 153-174
36. Tutin T.G. The hydrosere and current concepts of the climax. Journal of Ecology 29 (1941) 268-279
37. Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R., and Cushing C.E. River continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37 (1980) 130-137
38. Vuilleumier S., Wilcox C., Cairns B.J., and Possingham H.P. How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. Theoretical Population Biology 72 (2007) 77-85
39. Ward J.V. Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation 83 (1998) 269-278
40. Wilcox C., Cairns B.J., and Possingham H.P. The role of habitat disturbance and recovery in metapopulation persistence. Ecology 87 (2006) 855-863