|
Volumn 635, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 94-101
|
Comparison of homoleptic and heteroleptic 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ruthenium complexes as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence reagents in aqueous solution
|
Author keywords
Chemiluminescence; Electrochemiluminescence; Electrogenerated chemiluminescence; Heteroleptic ruthenium complexes
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTES;
AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS;
AQUEOUS SOLVENTS;
BIPYRIDINE;
CHEMICAL OXIDATIONS;
CHEMILUMINESCENCE INTENSITIES;
CO-REACTANTS;
COMPARATIVE STUDIES;
DETECTION LIMITS;
ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE;
ELECTROGENERATED CHEMILUMINESCENCE;
HETEROLEPTIC RUTHENIUM COMPLEXES;
HOMOLEPTIC;
PHENANTHROLINE;
RU(PHEN);
SIGNAL INTENSITIES;
TIME-SCALE;
VOLTAMMETRIC RESPONSE;
CHEMILUMINESCENCE;
ELECTROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES;
EMITTER COUPLED LOGIC CIRCUITS;
LIGHT EMISSION;
LIGHT MEASUREMENT;
LUMINESCENCE;
RUTHENIUM;
TRACE ANALYSIS;
RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS;
2,2'-DIPYRIDYL;
ELECTROCHEMISTRY;
FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS;
INDICATORS AND REAGENTS;
LUMINESCENCE;
MASS SPECTROMETRY;
OXIDATION-REDUCTION;
PHENANTHROLINES;
RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOLUTIONS;
SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;
WATER;
|
EID: 59049095068
PISSN: 00032670
EISSN: 18734324
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.12.042 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (50)
|