An immodest proposal: Pedagogic information supports for teachers

Teachers College Record

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 164-179

  Rothkopf, Ernst Z ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59049086941     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bjork, R. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol.1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 396-401). New York: Wiley and Sons.
2. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3. Branson, R. K., & Grow, G. (1987). Instructional systems development. In R. M Gagne (Ed.), Instructional technology:Foundations (pp. 397-428). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bulkley, K., & Fisler, J. (2003). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Educational Policy, 17, 317-342.
5. California Department of Education. (1999). Mathematics content standards for California public schools, kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5-17.
7. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the core knowledge sequence. Elementary School Journal, 101, 167-191.
8. Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing [Monograph]. Archives of Psychology, 40, n. pag.
9. Gausman, C. H., & Vonnes, J. (1969). The single concept film: Tool for individualized instruction. American Vocational Journal, 44, 14-17.
10. Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1973). Recall of words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 471-480.
11. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
12. Lumsdaine, A.A. (1960) Teaching machines: An introductory overview. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning (pp. 5-22). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
13. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, E. (Eds.). (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon.
15. Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided method of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14-19.
16. National Committee on Science Education. (1996). Standards and assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
17. New York State Education Department. (1996). Learning standards for mathematics, science, and technology. Albany, NY: Author.
18. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
19. Pashler, H., Zarow, G., & Triplett, B. (2003). Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1051-1057.
20. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1970). Educational experimental stations, data tables and memories for courses are effective supplements for the laboratory. In Needs of Educational and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-First Congress (pp. 704-710). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1981). A macroscopic model of instruction and purposive learning: An overview. Instructional Science, 10, 105-122.
22. Rothkopf, E. Z. (1996). Control of mathemagenic activities. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 979-898). New York: Macmillan.
23. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
24. Slamecka, N.J., & Graf, P. (1978). The Generation Effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 4, 592-604.
25. Statistical Abstracts of the United States. (2001). Education, Table 229. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.