Translation style and participant roles in court interpreting

Journal of Sociolinguistics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-28

  Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Court interpreting; Pragmatics; Reported speech; Stylistic variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 59049086482     PISSN: 13606441     EISSN: 14679841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00394.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, R. Bruce W. 1976. Perspectives on the role of the interpreter. In Richard W. Brislin (ed.) Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press. 208-228.
2. Angelelli, Claudia. 2001. Deconstructing the invisible interpreter: A study of the interpersonal role of the interpreter in a cross-linguistic/ cultural communicative event. PhD dissertation: Stanford University.
3. Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. 2005. Who is 'you'?Polite forms of address and ambiguous participant roles in court interpreting. Target: International Journal of Translation Studies 17: 203-226.
4. Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. 2006. 'Speak English or what?' - Code-switching and interpreter use in New York small claims court. PhD dissertation: New York University.
5. Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. To appear. Creating monolingualism in the multilingual courtroom. Sociolinguistic Studies.
6. Apfelbaum, Birgit. 2004. Gesprächsdynamik in Dolmetsch-Interaktionen: Eine empirische Untersuchung von Situationen internationaler Fachkommunikation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Arbeitssprachen Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch und Spanisch. Radolfzell, Germany: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
7. Bakhtin, Michail M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In Michael Holmquist (ed.) The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. 259-422.
8. Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145-204.
9. Bergeron, Gilles. 2002. L'interprétation en milieu judiciaire. Meta 47: 225-232.
10. Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
11. Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2000. Interpreting for the police: Issues in pre-trial phases of the judicial process. Forensic Linguistics 7: 212-237.
12. Blommaert, Jan. 2003. Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 607-623.
13. Bot, Hanneke. 2005. Dialogue interpreting as a specific case of reported speech. Interpreting 7: 237-261.
14. Colin, Joan and Ruth Morris. 1996. Interpreters and the Legal Process. Winchester, U.K.: Waterside Press.
15. Conley, John M. and William M. O'Barr. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
16. Davidson, Brad. 2000. The interpreter as institutional gatekeeper: The social-linguistic role of interpreters in Spanish-English medical discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 379-405.
17. Davidson, Brad. 2002. A model of the construction of conversational common ground in interpreted discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1273-1300.
18. Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins. 139-182.
19. Englebretson, Robert (ed.). 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/ Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins.
20. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland and Justine Coupland. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Howard Giles, Justine Coupland and Nikolas Coupland (eds.) Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, U.K./ Paris, France: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme/Cambridge University Press. 1-68.
21. Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford, U.K./Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22. Hale, Sandra. 2004. The Discourse of Court Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Benjamins.
23. Harris, Brian. 1990. Norms in interpretation. Target 2: 115-119.
24. Inghilleri, Moira. 2003. Habitus, field and discourse: Interpreting as a socially situated activity. Target 15: 243-268.
25. Johnstone, Barbara. To appear. Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Style. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Kadric, Mira. 2001. Dolmetschen bei Gericht: Erwartungen, Anforderungen, Kompetenzen. Vienna, Austria: WUV, Universitätsverlag.
27. Knapp, Karlfried and Annelie Knapp-Potthoff. 1985. Sprachmittlertätigkeit in der interkulturellen Kommunikation. In Jochen Rehbein (ed.) Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Tübingen, Germany: Günter Narr. 450-463.
28. Lang, Ranier. 1976. Interpreters in local courts in Papua New Guinea. In William M. O'Barr and Jean F. O'Barr (eds.) Language and Politics. The Hague, The Netherlands/Paris, France: Mouton. 327-365.
29. Mason, Ian. 1999. Introduction. The Translator 5: 147-160.
30. Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
31. Meyer, Bernd. 2004. Dolmetschen im medizinischen Aufklärungsgespräch: Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung zur Wissensvermittlung im mehrsprachigen Krankenhaus. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
32. Moeketsi, Rosemary. 1999. Discourse in a Multilingual and Multicultural Courtroom: A Court Interpreter's Guide. Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa: J. L. van Schaik.
33. Morris, Ruth. 1995. The moral dilemmas of court interpreting. The Translator 1: 25-46.
34. Müller, Frank Ernst. 2001. Inter- and intra-cultural aspects of dialogue-interpreting. In Aldo Di Luzio, Susanne Günthner and Franca Orletti (eds.) Culture in Communication: Analyses of Intercultural Situations. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins. 245-270.
35. O'Barr, William M. and Bowman K. Atkins. 1980. 'Women's language'or 'powerless language'? In Sally Mc-Connell-Ginet, Ruth Borker and Nelly Furman (eds.) Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger. 93-110.
36. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 1984. Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In Richard A. Shweder and Robert A. LeVine (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion. Cambridge, U.K.: University of Cambridge Press. 73-97.
37. Philips, Susan U. 1992. Evidentiary standards for American trials: Just the facts. In Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine (eds.) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 248-259.
38. Philips, Susan U. 1998. Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. New York/Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
39. Robinson, John, Helen Lawrence and Sali Tagliamonte. 2001. Goldvarb 2001: A Multivariate Analysis Application for Windows. York, U.K.: University of York.
40. Roy, Cynthia. 2000. Interpreting as a Discourse Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Marilyn Cochran-Smith. 1984. Learning to read culturally: Literacy before schooling. In Hillel Goelman, Antoinette A. Oberg and Frank Smith (eds.) Awakening to Literacy. The University of Victoria Symposium on Children's Response to a Literate Environment: Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinemann Educational Books. 3-23.
42. Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2002. Investigating stylistic variation. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.) Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. 375-401.
43. Shlesinger, Miriam. 1991. Interpreter latitude vs. due process: Simultaneous and consecutive interpretation in multilingual trials. In Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit (ed.) Empirical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies. Tübingen, Germany: Günter Narr. 147-155.
44. Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Benjamins.
45. Toury, Gideon. 2000. The nature and role of norms in translation. In Lawrence Venuti (ed.) The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge. 198-211.
46. Valdés, Guadelupe. 2003. Expanding Definitions of Giftedness: The Case of Young Interpreters from Immigrant Communities. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Valdés, Guadelupe, Christina Chávez and Claudia Angelelli. 2003. A performance team: Young interpreters and their parents. In Guadelupe Valdés (ed.) Expanding Definitions of Giftedness: The Case of Young Interpreters from Immigrant Communities. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 63-98.
48. Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. London/New York: Longman.
49. Wadensjö, Cecilia. 2004. Dialogue interpreting: A monologising practice in a dialogically organised world. Target 16: 105-124.
50. Wodak, Ruth. 1980. Discourse analysis and courtroom interaction. Discourse Processes 3: 369-380.