Bismarck versus beveridge: A comparison of social insurance systems in Europe

CESifo DICE Report

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 69-71

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58949101069     PISSN: 16120663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Berié, H. and U. Fink (2000), Europas Sozialmodell - Die europäischen Sozial-systeme im Vergleich: Eine volkswirtschaftliche Analyse, WISO Institut für Wirtschaft und Soziales GmbH.
2. Cremer, H. and P. Pestieau, (2003), "Social Insurance Competition between Bismarck and Beveridge", Journal of Urban Economics 54, 181-96.
3. DICE (Database for Institutional Comparisons in Europe), http:// www.cesifo.de.
4. Eurostat (2005), "Der Sozialschutz in der Europäischen Union", Statistik kurz gefasst no. 14.
5. Franke, S. F. (2004), Soziale Sicherungs-systeme, Wirtschaft, Arbeitswelt und Globalisierung, Universität Stuttgart, Diskussionsbeitrag.
6. Kolmar, M. (2007),"Beveridge versus Bismarck Public-pension Systems in Integrated Markets", Regional Science and Urban Economics 37, 649-69.
7. Pestieau, P. (2006), The Welfare State in the European Union, Economic and Social Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Purton, H. (1996), "European Welfare States in the 1990's: An Economic Analysis of the Challenges and Efforts at Reform", CEPS Research Report no. 19.
9. Thode, E. (2003), "Securing Pensions for the Next Fifty Years - Achievements of Recent Reforms in Selected Countries", CESifo DICE Report 1, 3-10.
10. United Nations, World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, Population Database, http://esa.un.org/unpp/index.asp?panel=2.