Impact of information on quality of life and satisfaction of non-small cell lung cancer patients: A randomized study of standardized versus individualized information before thoracic surgery

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1146-1152

  Barlési, Fabrice ^a,b   Barrau, Karine ^b   Loundou, Anderson ^b   Doddoli, Christophe ^a   Simeoni, Marie Claude ^b   Auquier, Pascal ^b   Thomas, Pascal ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Communication; Information; Lung cancer; Quality of life; Randomized trial; Satisfaction; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LUNG NON SMALL CELL CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL GLOBAL WELL BEING INDEX; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; THORAX SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LUNG TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; WRITING;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; THORACIC SURGERY; WRITING;

EID: 58949093511     PISSN: 15560864     EISSN: 15561380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181874637     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Davey HM, Butow PN, Armstrong BK. Cancer patients' preferences for written prognostic information provided outside the clinical context. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1450-1456.
2. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001;4:48-51.
3. Goldberg RJ. Disclosure of information to adult cancer patients: issues and update. J Clin Oncol 1984;2:948-955.
4. Tattersall MH, Butow PN. Consultation audio tapes: an underused cancer patient information aid and clinical research tool. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:431-437.
5. Scott JT, Harmsen M, Prictor MJ, Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt I. Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; CD001539.
6. Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ 1999;319:1241-1247.
7. National Cancer Institute: General Information About Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; February 13, 2008. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/ cancertopics/pdq/treatment/non-small-cell-lung/patient. Accessed February 13, 2008.
8. McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J. Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med 2001;23:227-234.
9. Iconomou G, Viha A, Koutras A, et al. Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol 2006;17:515-520.
10. McCorkle R, Benoliel KQ. Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life threatening disease. Soc Sci Med 1983;17:431-438.
11. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Symptom distress in newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients and as a predictor of survival in lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995;10:423-431.
12. Dales RE, Bélanger R, Shamji FM, Leech J, Crépeau A, Sachs HJ. Quality-of-life following thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1443-1449.
13. Myrdal G, Valtysdottir S, Lambe M, Ståhle E. Quality of life following lung cancer surgery. Thorax 2003;58:194-197.
14. Win T, Sharples L, Wells FC, Ritchie AJ, Munday H, Laroche CM. Effect of lung cancer surgery on quality of life. Thorax 2005;60:234-238.
15. Barlési F, Boyer L, Doddoli C, Antoniotti S, Thomas P, Auquier P. The place of patient satisfaction in quality assessment of lung cancer thoracic surgery. Chest 2005;128:3475-3481.
16. Dupuy HJ. The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In NK Wenger, MI Matson, CD Furberg, J Elinson. (Eds.), Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York: Le Jacq Publ Inc, 1984. Pp. 170-183.
17. Rasmussen NA, Norholm V, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWB). Qual Life News Lett 1999;22:7.
18. Antoniotti S, Labarere J, Gerbaud L, et al. Validation of a French hospitalized patient satisfaction: QSH. Qual Life Res 2001;10:259.
19. Bayle WF, Aaron J. Patient-physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:331-335.
20. Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 2005;17:351-354.
21. Delvaux N, Razavi D, Marchal S, Brédart A, Farvacques C, Slachmuylder JL. Effects of a 105 hours psychological training program on attitudes, communication skills and occupational stress in oncology: a randomised study. Br J Cancer 2004;90:106-114.
22. Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW. Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:2449-2456.
23. Butow P, Devine R, Boyer M, Pendlebury S, Jackson M, Tattersall MH. Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4401-4409.
24. Jones RB, Pearson J, Cawsey AJ, et al. Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: a randomised trial. BMJ 2006;332:942-948.
25. Jones R, Pearson J, Mc Gregor S, et al. Cross sectional survey of patient's satisfaction with information about cancer. BMJ 1999;319: 1247-1248.
26. Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:134-149.
27. Davis TC, Dolan N, Ferreira MR, et al. The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Invest 2001;19: 193-200.
28. Brédart A, Coens C, Aaronson N, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology settings from European and Asian countries: preliminary results based on the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:323-330.
29. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1-244.
30. Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U. Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 2005;27:96-103.
31. Mancini J, Nogues C, Adenis C, et al. Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:871-880.
32. Gabrijel S, Grize L, Helfenstein E, et al. Receiving diagnosis of lung cancer: patient recall of information and satisfaction with physician communication. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:297-302.
33. Loblaw DA, Bezjak A, Bunston T. Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor Questionnaire. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 1931-1938.
34. Barlési F, Chabert-Greillier L, Loundou A, et al. Validation of the French version of the Princess Margaret Hospital Patient Satisfaction with their Doctor Questionnaire (PMH/PSQ-MD), the F-PMH/PSQ MD. Rev Mal Respir 2006;23:227-236.