Simulation of ground-truth validation data via physically- and statistically-based warps

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5241 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2008, Pages 459-467

  Hamarneh, Ghassan ^a   Jassi, Preet ^a   Tang, Lisa ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deformation; Non uniformity; Segmentation; Simulation; Validation; Variation; Vibration

Indexed keywords

NON-UNIFORMITY; SEGMENTATION; SIMULATION; VALIDATION; VARIATION; VIBRATION;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DEFORMATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL IMAGING; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; WEAVING;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58949085196     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_55     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Alexander, D., Pierpaoli, C., Basser, P., Gee, J.: Spatial transformations of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images. IEEE TMI 20(11), 1131-1139 (2001)
2. Chou, Y., Skrinjar, O.: Ground truth data for validation of nonrigid image registration Algorithms. In: ISBI, pp. 716-719 (2004)
3. Christensen, et al.: Introduction to the Non-Rigid Image Registration Evaluation Project (NIREP). In: Biomedical Image Registration Workshop, pp. 128-135 (2006)
4. Cocosco, C., Kollokian, V., Kwan, R., Evans, A.: BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database. NeuroImage 5(4), part 2/4, S425 (1997)
5. Cootes, T., Edwards, Taylor, C.: Active Appearance Models. PAMI 23(6), 681-685 (2001)
6. Cootes, T., Taylor, C., Cooper, D., Grahamet, J.: Active Shape Models - Their Training and Application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38-59 (1995)
7. Cootes, T., Taylor, C.: Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis. Image and Vision Computing 13(5), 403-409 (1995)
8. Davies, R., Twining, C., Cootes, T., Waterton, J., Taylor, C.: A minimum description length approach to statistical shape Modeling. IEEE TMI 21(5), 525-537 (2002)
9. Dice, L.: Measures of the Amount of Ecologie Association Between Species. Ecology 26(3), 297-302 (1945)
10. Everingham, M., Muller, H., Thomas, B.: Evaluating image segmentation algorithms using monotonie hulls in fitness/cost space. BMVC 363-372 (2001)
11. Everingham, M., Muller, H., Thomas, B.: Evaluating image segmentation algorithms using the Pareto front. ECCV (IV), 34-48 (2002)
12. Fitzpatrick, et al.: Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain. IEEE TMI 17, 571-585 (1998)
13. Gerig, G., Jomier, M., Chakos, M.: VALMET: A new validation tool for assessing and improving 3D object segmentation. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 516-523. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
14. Hellier, et al.: Retrospective Evaluation of Inter-subject Brain Registration. IEEE TMI 22(9), 1120-1130 (2003)
15. Internet Brain Segmentation Repository, http://www.cma.mgh.harvard.edu/ ibsr/
16. Jaccard, P.: Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37, 547-579 (1901)
17. Karlsson, J., Ericsson, A.: A ground truth correspondence measure for benchmarking. In: ICPR. pp. 568-573 (2006)
18. Kwan, R., Evans, A., Pike, B.: MRI Simulation-Based Evaluation of Image-Processing and Classification Methods. IEEE TMI 18(11), 1085-1097 (1999)
19. Lehman, T., Gonner, C., Spitzer, K.: Survey: Interpolation Methods in Medical Image Processing. IEEE TMI 18(11), 1049-1075 (1999)
20. Maintz, J., Viergever, M.: A survey of medical image registration. MIA 2(1), 1-36 (1998)
21. Maurer, C., Fitzpatrick, J., Wang, M., Galloway, R., Maciunas, R., Allen, G.: Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE TMI 16(4), 447-462 (1997)
22. Pawluczyk, O., Yaffe, M.: Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms. Medical Physics 28(4), 438-444 (2001)
23. Pennec, X., Thirion, J.: A Framework for Uncertainty and Validation of 3-D Registration Methods based on Points and Frames. IJCV 25(3), 203-229 (1997)
24. Reilhac, et al.: PET-SORTEO: validation and development of database of Simulated PET volumes. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 52(5), part 1, 1321-1328 (2005)
25. Rosenberger, C.: Adaptive evaluation of image segmentation results. In: ICPR, pp. 399-402 (2006)
26. Schestowitz, R., Twining, C., Petrovic, V., Cootes, T., Crum, B., Taylor, C.: Non-Rigid Registration Assessment Without Ground Truth. In: MIUA, vol. 2, pp. 151-155 (2006)
27. Sled, J., Pike, B.: Understanding Intensity Non-uniformity in MRI. In: Wells, W.M., Colchester, A.C.F., Delp, S.L. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, pp. 614-622. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
28. Styner, M., Rajamani, K., Nolte, L., Zsemlye, C., Székely, G., Taylor, C., Davies, R.: Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building. In: Taylor, C.J., Noble, J.A. (eds.) IPMI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2732, pp. 63-75. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
29. Twining, C., Cootes, T., Marsland, S., Petrovic, V., Schestowitz, R., Taylor, C.: Information-Theoretic Unification of Groupwise Non-Rigid Registration and Model Building. In: MIUA. pp. 226-230 (2006)
30. Unnikrishnan, R., Pantofaru, C. Hebert, M.: A Measure for Objective Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms. In: CVPR Workshop on Empirical Methods in Computer Vision, p. 34 (2005)
31. Warfield, S., Zho, K., Wells, W.: Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE): An Algorithm for the Validation of Image Segmentation. IEEE TMI 23(7), 903-921 (2004)
32. West, et al.: Comparison and evaluation of retrospective inter-modality brain image registration techniques. J. Computer Assisted Tomography 21 (4), 554-566 (1997)
33. Zhang, Y.: A review of recent evaluation methods for image segmentation. In: ISSPA, pp. 148-151 (2001)
34. Zhang, H., Fritts, J., Goldman, S.: An entropy-based objective evaluation methods for image segmentation. In: SPIE, vol. 5307, pp. 38-49 (2003)
35. Zhang, H., Cholleti, S., Goldman, S.: Meta-Evaluation of Image Segmentation Using Machine Learning. In: CVPR, pp. 1138-1145 (2006)
36. Zhang, Y.: A survey on Evaluation Methods for Image Segmentation. Pattern Recognition 29(8), 1335-1346 (1996)