Predator-prey interactions under climate change: The importance of habitat vs body temperature

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 219-224

  Broitman, B R ^a,b   Szathmary, P L ^c   Mislan, K A S ^c   Blanchette, C A ^d   Helmuth, B ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL NORTE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY TEMPERATURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECHINODERM; LANDSCAPE; MICROHABITAT; MOLLUSC; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SANTA CRUZ [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; MYTILUS; MYTILUS CALIFORNIANUS; PISASTER; PISASTER OCHRACEUS;

EID: 58849165305     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17075.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bendat, J. S. Piersol, A. G. 1986. Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley.
2. Blanchette, C. A. et al. 2006. Intertidal community structure and oceanographic patterns around Santa Cruz Island, California, USA Mar. Biol. 149 : 689 701.
3. Broitman, B. R. et al. 2005. Recruitment of intertidal invertebrate and oceanographic variability at Santa Cruz Island, California Limnol. Oceanogr. 50 : 1473 1479.
4. Buckley, B. A. et al. 2001. Adjusting the thermostat: the threshold induction temperature for the heat-shock response in intertidal mussels (genus Mytilus) changes as a function of thermal history J. Exp. Biol. 204 : 3571 3579.
5. Buckley, L. B. et al. 2008. Thermal and energetic constrains on ectotherm abundance: a global test using lizards Ecology 89 : 48 55.
6. Clark, J. S. et al. 2001. Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative Science 293 : 657 660.
7. Durant, J. M. et al. 2007. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability Clim. Res. 33 : 238 271.
8. Fischer, D. T. Still, C. J. 2007. Evaluating patterns of fog water deposition and isotopic composition on the California Channel Islands Water Resour. Res. 43 doi:10.1029/2006WR005124.
9. Fitzhenry, T. et al. 2004. Testing the effects of wave exposure, site, and behavior on intertidal mussel body temperatures: applications and limits of temperature logger design Mar. Biol. 145 : 339 349.
10. Hallett, T. B. et al. 2004. Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather Nature 430 : 71 75.
11. Harley, C. D. G. 2003. Abiotic stress and herbivory interact to set range limits across a two-dimensional stress gradient Ecology 84 : 1477 1488.
12. Helmuth, B. 2002. How do we measure the environment? Linking intertidal thermal physiology and ecology through biophysics Int. Comp. Biol. 42 : 837 845.
13. Helmuth, B. S. et al. 2002. Climate change and latitudinal patterns of intertidal thermal stress Science 298 : 1015 1017.
14. Helmuth, B. et al. 2006a. Mosaic patterns of thermal stress in the rocky intertidal zone: implications for climate change Ecol. Monogr. 76 : 461 479.
15. Helmuth, B. et al. 2006b. Living on the edge of two changing worlds: forecasting the responses of rocky intertidal ecosystems to climate change Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37 : 373 404.
16. Huey, R. et al. 1989. Hot rocks and not-so-hot rocks: retreat-site selection by garter snakes and its thermal consequences Ecology 70 : 931 944.
17. Hugall, A. et al. 2002. Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the wet tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 6112 6117.
18. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks Cold Spring Harbour Symp. Quant. Biol. 22 : 415 427.
19. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the 4th Assessment Rep. of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Camb. Univ. Press.
20. Kearney, M. 2006. Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modelling? Oikos 115 : 186 191.
21. Kearney, M. Porter, W. P. 2004. Mapping the fundamental niche: physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard Ecology 85 : 3119 3131.
22. Kruskal, W. H. 1958. Ordinal measures of association J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53 : 814 861.
23. McGill, B. J. et al. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 178 185.
24. Menge, B. A. et al. 1994. The keystone species concept: variation in interaction strength in a rocky intertidal habitat Ecol. Monogr. 64 : 249 286.
25. Newell, R. C. 1973. Factors affecting the respiration of intertidal invertebrates Int. Comp. Biol. 13 : 513 528.
26. Otero, M. P. Siegel, D. A. 2004. Spatial and temporal characteristics of sediment and phytoplankton blooms in the Santa Barbara Channel Deep Sea Res. II 51 : 1129 1149.
27. Paine, R. T. 1974. Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator Oecologia 15 : 93 120.
28. Pearson, R. G. Dawson, T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12 : 361 371.
29. Petes, L. E. et al. 2008. Effects of environmental stress on intertidal mussels and their seastar predators Oecologia 156 : 671 680.
30. Pincebourde, S. et al. 2008. Body temperature during low tide alters the feeding performance of a top intertidal predator Limnol. Oceanogr. 23 : 1562 1573.
31. Porter, W. P. Gates, D. M. 1969. Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment Ecol. Monogr. 39 : 245 270.
32. Porter, W. P. et al. 2000. Calculating climate effects on birds and mammals: impacts on biodiversity, conservation, population parameters, and global community structure Am. Zool. 40 : 597 630.
33. Pörtner, H. O. Knust, R. 2007. Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance Science 315 : 95 97.
34. Robles, C. et al. 1995. Responses of a key intertidal predator to varying recruitment of its prey Ecology 76 : 565 579.
35. Sanford, E. 1999. Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature Science 283 : 2095 2097.
36. Sanford, E. 2002. Water temperature, predation, and the neglected role of physiological rate effects in rocky intertidal communities Int. Comp. Biol. 42 : 881 891.
37. Sokal, R. R. Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman.
38. Somero, G. N. 2005. Linking biogeography to physiology: evolutionary and acclimatory adjustments of thermal limits Front. Zool. 2 doi:10.1186/1742-9994- 2-1.
39. Stevenson, R. D. 1985. Body size and limits to the daily range of body temperature in terrestrial ectotherms Am. Nat. 125 : 102 117.
40. Stockwell, D. Peters, D. 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13 : 143 158.
41. Szathmary, P. L. et al. in press. Climate change in the rocky intertidal zone: prediciting and measuring the body temperature of an intertidal keystone predator. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
42. Winant, C. D. et al. 2003. 'Characteristic patterns of shelf circulation at the boundary between central and southern California. J. Geophys. Res 108 doi: 10:1029/2001JC001302.