Placing the normative logics of accountability in gthick perspective

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 885-904

  Ebrahim, Alnoor ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Governance; Mission; Nonprofit; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 58849128738     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764208327664     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ActionAid. (1999). Fighting poverty together: ActionAid's strategy 1999-2005, a short guide. London: ActionAid.
2. ActionAid. (2000). ALPS: Accountability, learning and planning system. London: ActionAid.
3. Argyris, C., & Schan, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Behn, R.D. (2005). The core drivers of CitiStat: It's not just about the meetings and the maps. International Public Management Journal, 8, 295-319.
5. Board Source and Independent Sector. (2006). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and implications for nonprofit organizations. Washington, DC: Board Source and Independent Sector. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from www.independentsector.org/ issues/sarbanesoxley.html
6. Bogart, W.T. 1995. Accountability in nonprofit organizations: An economic perspective. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 157-170.
7. Brown, L.D. (2007). Multiparty social action and mutual accountability. In A. Ebrahim & E. Weisband (Eds.), Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics (pp. 89-111). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Childress, S., Elmore, R., & Grossman, A. (2006). How to manage urban school districts. Harvard Business Review, 84, 55-68.
9. Chisolm, L.B. (1995). Accountability of nonprofit organizations and those who control them: The legal framework. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 141-156.
10. David, R., & Mancini, A. (2003, March 25-26). Transforming development practice-The journey in the quest to develop planning, monitoring and evaluation systems that facilitate (rather than hinder) development. Paper presented at workshop on "Partners in Development Evaluation: Learning and Accountability," organized by France and the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Working Party on Aid Evaluation, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Paris.
11. David, R., & Mancini, A. (2004). Going against the flow: Making organisational systems part of the solution rather than part of the problem. Lessons for Change in Policy & Organisations, No. 7. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
12. David, R., Mancini, A., & Owusu, C. (2001). Notes to accompany ALPS. London: ActionAid.
13. DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
14. Dobkin Hall, P. (2005). A solution is a product in search of a problem: A history of foundations and evaluation research. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼phall/EVALUATION%20ESSAY.pdf
15. Ebrahim, A. (2002). Information struggles: The role of information in the reproduction of NGO-funder relations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 85-113.
16. Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 56-87.
17. Edelman Trust. (2007). Edelman Trust barometer 2007. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from www.edelman.com/trust/2007/trust-final-1-31.pdf
18. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24, 961-973.
19. Feldman, M.S., & March, J.G. (1988). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. In J. G. March (Ed.), Decisions and organizations (pp. 410-428). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
20. Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: "Development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fleishman, J.L. (2007). The foundation: A great American secret: How private wealth is changing the world. New York: Public Affairs.
22. Fremont-Smith, M.R. (2006). The search for greater accountability of nonprofit organizations: Recent legal developments and proposals for change (Working Paper No. 33.8). Cambridge, MA: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from www.ksg.harvard.edu/hauser/PDF-XLS/workingpapers/workingpaper-33.8.pdf
23. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
24. Goodin, R.E. (2003). Democratic accountability: The third sector and all. Paper presented at Nonprofit Scholars Conference: Crisis of Governance: Implications for the Nonprofit/Non-Governmental Sector. Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Conference date: April 3-4, 2003. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
25. Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
26. International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL). (2006). Analysis of law #18-FZ, on introducing amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation. Washington, DC: ICNL. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from www.icnl.org/knowledge/news/2006/01-19-Russia-NGO-Law-Analysis.pdf
27. Jordan, L. (2007). A rights-based approach to accountability. In A. Ebrahim & E. Weisband (Eds.), Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics (pp. 151-167). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (Eds.). (2006). NGO accountability: Politics, principles and innovations. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
29. Keating, E.K. (2006). Is it time to address selective disclosure for nonprofit organizations? (Working Paper No. 33.7). Cambridge, MA: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hauser/PDF-XLS/workingpapers/workingpaper-33.7.pdf
30. Light, P.C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945-1995. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Light, P.C. (2000). Making nonprofits work: A report on the tides of nonprofit management reform. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute and Brookings Institution Press.
32. Macdonald, K. (2007). Public accountability within transnational supply chains: A global agenda for empowering Southern workers? In A. Ebrahim & E. Weisband (Eds.), Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics (pp. 252-279). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
34. Nielsen, W.A. (1972). The big foundations. New York: Columbia University Press.
35. Ostrower, F., & Bobowick, M.J. (2006). Nonprofit governance and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Urban Institute national survey on nonprofit governance, preliminary findings. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy.
36. Panel on the Nonprofit Sector. (2005). Strengthening transparency, governance, accountability of charitable organizations: A final report to Congress and the nonprofit sector. Washington, DC: Independent Sector. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.nonprofitpanel.org/report/final/
37. Riddell, R.C. (1999). Evaluating NGO development interventions. In D. Lewis (Ed.), International perspectives on voluntary action: Reshaping the third sector (pp. 222-241). London: Earthscan.
38. Romzek, B.S., & Dubnick, M.J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47, 227-238.
39. Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T.D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation. Work and Occupations, 26, 107-128.
40. Scott-Villiers, P. (2002). The struggle for organisational change: How the ActionAid accountability, learning and planning system emerged. Development in Practice, 12, 424-435.
41. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
42. Smillie, I. (2007). Not accountable to anyone? Collective action and the role of NGOs in the campaign to ban "blood diamonds." In A. Ebrahim & E. Weisband (Eds.), Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics (pp. 112-130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Smillie, I., & Hailey, J. (2001). Managing for change: Leadership, strategy and management in Asian NGOs. London: Earthscan.
44. Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Tassie, B., Murray, V., & Cutt, J. (1998). Evaluating social service agencies: Fuzzy pictures of organizational effectiveness. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9, 59-79.
46. Wolch, J.R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.