Right hemispheric dominance for echo suppression

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 465-472

  Spierer, Lucas ^a   Bourquin, Nathalie M P ^a   Tardif, Eric ^a   Murray, Micah M ^a,b   Clarke, Stephanie ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b University of Lausanne   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potential (AEP); Build up; Electrical brain imaging; Electroencephalography (EEG); Precedence effect; Sound localization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CUES; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; SOUND LOCALIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58849126856     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.022     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Arnott S.R., Binns M.A., Grady C.L., and Alain C. Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. Neuroimage 22 (2004) 401-408
2. Blauert J., and Col J.P. In: Cazals Y., Damany L., and Horner K. (Eds). Irregularities in the precedence effect, auditory physiology and perception (1992), Pergamon Press, Oxford 531-538
3. Blauert J. Spatial hearing (revised edition) (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Carney L.H., and Yin T.C. Responses of low-frequency cells in the inferior colliculus to interaural time differences of clicks: excitatory and inhibitory components. Journal of Neurophysiology 62 1 (1989) 144-161
5. Clifton R.K., and Freyman R.L. Effect of click rate and delay on breakdown of the precedence effect. Perception & Psychophysics 46 (1989) 139-145
6. Clifton R.K., Freyman R.L., Litovsky R.Y., and McCall D. Listeners' expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (1994) 1525-1533
7. Clifton R.K. Breakdown of echo suppression in the precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82 (1987) 1834-1835
8. Cranford J., Diamond I.T., Ravizza R., and Whitfield L.C. Unilateral lesions of the auditory cortex and the 'precedence effect'. The Journal of Physiology 213 2 (1971) 24P-25P
9. Damaschke J., Riedel H., and Kollmeier B. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials. Hearing Research 205 1-2 (2005) 157-171
10. De Santis L., Clarke S., and Murray M.M. Automatic and intrinsic auditory "what" and "where" processing in humans revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Cerebral Cortex 17 1 (2007) 9-17
11. Dien J., and Santuzzi A.M. Application of repeated-measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In: Handy T. (Ed). Event related potentials: A methods handbook (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Dimitrijevic A., and Stapells D.R. Human electrophysiological examination of buildup of the precedence effect. Neuroreport 31 (2006) 1133-1137
13. Freyman R.L., Clifton R.K., and Litovsky R.Y. Dynamic processes in the precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (1991) 874-884
14. Grantham D.W. Left-right asymmetry in the buildup of echo suppression in normal-hearing adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996) 1118-1123
15. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S., Lantz G., Michel C.M., and Landis T. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity: I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topography 14 (2001) 131-137
16. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Murray M.M., Michel C.M., Martuzzi R., and Gonzalez Andino S.L. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 527-539
17. Irvine D.R., Rajan R., and Aitkin L.M. Sensitivity to interaural intensity differences of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat: I. Types of sensitivity and effects of variations in sound pressure level. Journal of Neurophysiology 75 (1996) 75-96
18. Kaiser J., and Lutzenberger W. Location changes enhance hemispheric asymmetry of magnetic fields evoked by lateralized sounds in humans. Neuroscience Letters 314 1-2 (2001) 17-20
19. Krumbholz K., and Nobbe A. Buildup and breakdown of echo suppression for stimuli presented over headphones-the effects of interaural time and level differences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (2002) 654-663
20. Kujala T., Tervaniemi M., and Schröger E. The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological psychology 74 1 (2007) 1-19 Review
21. Lehmann D., and Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 48 (1980) 609-621
22. Lewald J., Foltys H., and Töpper R. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in spatial hearing. Journal of Neuroscience 22 3 (2002) RC207
23. Liebenthal E., and Pratt H. Human auditory cortex electrophysiological correlates of the precedence effect: Binaural echo lateralization suppression. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1999) 291-303
24. Litovsky R.Y. Physiological studies of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of the kitten. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 6 (1998) 3139-3152
25. Litovsky R.Y., and Yin T.C. Physiological studies of the precedence effect in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Neural mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology 80 3 (1998) 1302-1316
26. Litovsky R.Y., Colburn H.S., Yost W.A., and Guzman S.J. The precedence effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (1999) 1633-1654
27. Michel C.M., Murray M.M., Lantz G., Gonzalez S., Spinelli L., and Grave de Peralta R. EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology 115 10 (2004) 2195-2222 Review
28. Murray M.M., Foxe D.M., Javitt D.C., and Foxe J.J. Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 24 31 (2004) 6898-6903
29. Murray M.M., Brunet D., and Michel C.M. Topographic ERP analyses: A step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography 20 4 (2008) 249-264
30. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
31. Perrin F., Bertrand O., and Pernier J. Scalp current density mapping: Value and estimation from potential data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 34 4 (1987) 283-288
32. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Baribeau-Braun J., and Healey T.M. Evoked potential audiometry. Journal of Otolaryngology 6 (1976) 90-119
33. Plonsey R. The nature of sources of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields. Biophysical Journal 39 3 (1982) 309-312
34. Pourtois G., Delplanque S., Michel C., and Vuilleumier P. Beyond conventional event-related brain potential (ERP): Exploring the time-course of visual emotion processing using topographic and principal component analyses. Brain Topography 20 4 (2008) 265-277
35. Pratt H., Polyakov A., and Kontorovich L. Evidence for separate processing in the human brainstem of interaural intensity and temporal disparities for sound lateralization. Hearing Research 108 (1997) 1-8
36. Schröger E., and Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 7 (1996) 3005-3008
37. Skrandies W. The effect of stimulation frequency and retinal stimulus location on visual evoked potential topography. Brain Topography 20 (2007) 15-20
38. Spierer L., Tardif E., Sperdin H., Murray M.M., and Clarke S. Learning-induced plasticity in auditory spatial representations revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Journal of Neuroscience 27 20 (2007) 5474-5483
39. Spierer L., Murray M.M., Tardif E., and Clarke S. The path to success in auditory spatial discrimination: Electrical neuroimaging responses within the supratemporal plane predict performance outcome. Neuroimage 41 2 (2008) 493-503
40. Tardif E., Murray M.M., Meylan R., Spierer L., and Clarke S. The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans. Brain Research 1092 (2006) 161-176
41. Ungan P., Yagcioglu S., and Goksoy C. Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: Scalp topography and dipole sources. Clinical Neurophysiology 112 3 (2001) 485-498
42. Wallach H., Newman E.B., and Rosenzweig M.R. The precedence effect in sound localization. The American Journal of Psychology 62 3 (1949) 315-336
43. Whitfield I.C. Mechanisms of sound localization. Nature 233 5315 (1971) 95-97
44. Whitfield I.C., Cranford J., Ravizza R., and Diamond I.T. Effects of unilateral ablation of auditory cortex in cat on complex sound localization. Journal of Neurophysiology 35 5 (1972) 718-731
45. Woldorff M.G., Tempelmann C., Fell J., Tegeler C., Gaschler-Markefski B., Hinrichs H., et al. Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Human Brain Mapping 7 1 (1999) 49-66
46. Woods T.M., Lopez S.E., Long J.H., Rahman J.E., and Recanzone G.H. Effects of stimulus azimuth and intensity on the single-neuron activity in the auditory cortex of the alert macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 96 6 (2006) 3323-3337
47. Yin T.C. Physiological correlates of the precedence effect and summing localization in the inferior colliculus of the cat. Journal of Neuroscience 14 9 (1994) 5170-5186