Development of new indices to evaluate protein-protein interfaces: Assembling space volume, assembling space distance, and global shape descriptor

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 706-711

  Maeda, Miki H ^a   Kinoshita, Kengo ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Assembling space volume; Delaunay tessellation; Gap volume; Shape complementarity; Subunit assembly

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLING SPACE VOLUME; DELAUNAY TESSELLATION; GAP VOLUME; SHAPE COMPLEMENTARITY; SUBUNIT ASSEMBLY;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; DIMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 58849118376     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chandonia J.M., and Brenner S.E. The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science 311 (2006) 347-351
2. Lawrence M.C., and Colman P.M. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 234 (1993) 946-950
3. Connolly M.L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 221 (1983) 709-713
4. Goldman B.B., and Wipke W.T. QSD Quadratic shape descriptors. 2. Molecular docking using quadratic shape descriptors (QSDock). Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 38 (2000) 79-94
5. Tsuchiya Y., Kinoshita K., and Nakamura H. Structure-based prediction of DNA-binding sites on proteins using the empirical preference of electrostatic potential and the shape of molecular surfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 55 (2004) 885-894
6. Gabb H.A., Jackson R.M., and Sternberg M.J.E. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272 (1997) 106-120
7. Chen R., and Wing. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 51 (2003) 397-408
8. Laskowski R.A. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graph. 13 (1995) 323-330
9. Kawabata T., and Go N. Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 68 (2007) 516-529
10. Delaunay B. Sur la sphère vide, Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR. Otdelenie Matematicheskikh i Estestvennykh Nauk 7 (1934) 793-800
11. Wako H., and Yamato T. Novel method to detect a motif of local structures in different protein conformations. Protein Eng. 11 (1998) 981-990
12. Bostick D.L., Shen M., and Vaisman I.I. A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 56 (2004) 487-501
13. Roach J., Sharma S., Kapustina M., and Carter C.W. Structure alignment via Delaunay tetrahedralization. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 60 (2005) 66-81
14. Bernauer J., Azé J., Janin J., and Poupon A. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties. Bioinfomatics 23 (2007) 555-562
15. Taylor T., Rivera M., Wilson G., and Vaisman I.I. New method for protein secondary structure assignment based on a simple topological descriptor. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 60 (2005) 513-524
16. Liang J., Edelsbrunner H., Fu P., Sudhakar V., and Subramaniam S. Analytical shape computation of macromolecules. II. Inaccessible cavities in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 33 (1998) 18-19
17. Liang J., Edelsbrunner H., and Woodward C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Protein Sci. 7 (1998) 1884-1897
18. Voronoi G. Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 133 (1907) 97-178
19. Poupon A. Voronoi and Voronoi-related tessellations in studies of protein structure and interaction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14 (2004) 233-241
20. Lee B., and Richards F.M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55 (1971) 379-400
21. Barber C.B., Dobkin D.P., and Huhdanpa H.T. The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Software 22 (1996) 469-483
22. Ponstingl H., Henrick K., and Thornton M. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 41 (2000) 47-57
23. Jones S., and Thornton J.M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1995) 13-20
24. Samudzi C.T., and Rubin J.R. Structure of recombinant bovine interferon-gamma at 3.0 Å resolution. Acta Cryst. D 49 (1993) 513-521
25. Carroll S.F., Barbieri J.T., and Collier R.J. Dimeric form of diphtheria toxin: purification and characterization. Biochemistry 25 (1986) 2425-2430
26. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Cryst. D 50 (1994), 760-763.