Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Jansen, Lina ^a   Onat, Selim ^a   König, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Eye movements; Natural stimuli; Overt attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LIGHT; NATURAL SCIENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TIME;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LIGHT; NATURE; SACCADES; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 58849113447     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.1.29     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arnott, S. R., & Shedden, J. M. (2000). Attention switching in depth using random-dot autostereograms: Attention gradient asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1459-1473.
2. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., Andersen, G. J., & Theeuwes, J. (1997). Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a "depth-aware" attentional focus. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 524-529.
3. Baddeley, R. J., & Tatler, B. W. (2006). High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: A Bayesian system identification analysis. Vision Research, 46, 2824-2833.
4. Bahill, A. T., Clark, M. R., & Stark, L. (1975). Dynamic overshoot in saccadic eye movements is caused by neurological control signed reversals. Experimental Neurology, 48, 107-122.
5. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C., & Pettigrew, J. D. (1967). The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. The Journal of Physiology, 193, 327-342.
6. Becker, W. (1989). Metrics. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Neurobiology of saccadic eye movements (pp. 13-67). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
7. Becker, W. (1991). Saccades. In R. H. S. Carpenter (Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction. Eye movements (pp. 95-137). London: Macmillan.
8. Bekkering, H., & Neggers, S. F. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370-374.
9. Bernhard, B. (2006). How disparity fits into the statistics and the neural processing of natural scenes. An EEG study. Bachelor's thesis, University of Osnabrück.
10. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
11. Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. Carmi, R., & Itti, L. (2006). Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes. Vision Research, 46, 4333-4345.
13. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
14. Cowey, A., Small, M., & Ellis, S. (1994). Left visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1059-1066.
15. Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1999). Binocular neurons in v1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5602-5618.
16. Deco, G., & Rolls, E. T. (2004). A neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition. Vision Research, 44, 621-642.
17. Einhäuser, W., & König, P. (2003). Does luminance-contrast contribute to a saliency map of overt visual attention? European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1089-1097.
18. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauser, U., Frady, E. P., Nadler, S., König, P., & Koch, C. (2006). The relation of phase noise and luminance contrast to overt attention in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 6(11):1, 1148-1158, http://journalofvision.org/6/11/1/, doi:10.1167/6.11.1.
19. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauser, U., & Koch, C. (2008). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8(2):2, 1-19, http://journalofvision.org/8/2/2/, doi:10.1167/8.2.2.
20. Einhäuser, W., Schumann, F., Bardins, S., Bartl, K., Böning, G., Schneider, E., et al. (2007). Human eye-head co-ordination in natural exploration. Network, 18, 267-297.
21. Elazary, L., & Itti, L. (2008). Interesting objects are visually salient. Journal of Vision, 8(3):3, 1-15, http://journalofvision.org/8/3/3/, doi:10.1167/8.3.3.
22. Epelboim, J. (1998). Gaze and retinal-image-stability in two kinds of sequential looking tasks. Vision Research, 38, 3773-3784.
23. Epelboim, J. L., Steinman, R. M., Kowler, E., Edwards, M., Pizlo, Z., Erkelens, C. J., et al. (1995). The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks. Vision Research, 35, 3401-3422.
24. Epelboim, J., Steinman, R. M., Kowler, E., Pizlo, Z., Erkelens, C. J., & Collewijn, H. (1997). Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks. Vision Research, 37, 2597-2607.
25. Faraggi, D., & Reiser, B. (2002). Estimation of the area under the ROC curve. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 3093-3106.
26. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8(2):6, 1-17, http://journalofvision.org/8/2/6/, doi:10.1167/8.2.6.
27. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
28. Hamker, F. H. (2004). A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Research, 44, 501-521.
29. Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (2005). Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 188-194.
30. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. L. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
31. Hirani, A., & Totsuka, T. (1995). A projection based algorithm for scratch and wire removal in images. In Proceedings of the 5th Sony Research Forum (pp. 20-25). Tokyo, Japan: SONY Corporation.
32. Hirani, A., & Totsuka, T. (1996). Combining frequency and spatial domain information for fast interactive image noise removal. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 269-276). New York: ACM Press.
33. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 398-415.
34. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
36. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
37. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 2, 194-203.
38. Julesz, B. (1960). Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 39, 1125-1162.
39. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
40. Maärtin, R., Steger, J., Lingemann, K., Nüchter, A., Hertzberg, J., & König, P. (2007). Assessing stereo matching algorithms using ground-truth disparity maps of natural scenes. In Hoffmann, K. P. & K. Krieglstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of the German Neuroscience Society/31st Göttingen Neurobiology Conference, Neuroforum 2007: 1 (Suppl.: TS12-5B).
41. McQuaide, S. C., Seibel, E. J., Kelly, J. P., Schowengerdt, B. T., & Furness, T. A. (2003). A retinal scanning display system that produces multiple focal planes with a deformable membrane mirror. Displays, 24, 65-72.
42. Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. Vision Research, 11, 929-942.
43. O'Shea, R. P., Govan, D. G., & Sekuler, R. (1997). Blur and contrast as pictorial depth cues. Perception, 26, 599-612.
44. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123.
45. Parkhurst, D. J., & Niebur, E. (2004). Texture contrast attracts overt visual attention in natural scenes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 783-789.
46. Parks, N. A., & Corballis, P. M. (2006). Attending to depth: Electrophysiological evidence for a viewer-centered asymmetry. Neuroreport, 17, 643-647.
47. Rafal, R., Danziger, S., Grossi, G., Machado, L., & Ward, R. (2002). Visual detection is gated by attending for action: Evidence from hemispatial neglect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 16371-16375.
48. Rafal, R.,Ward, R., & Danziger, S. (2006). Selection for action and selection for awareness: Evidence from hemispatial neglect. Brain Research, 1080, 2-8.
49. Reinagel, P., & Zador, A. M. (1999). Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network, 10, 341-350.
50. Rizzolatti, G., & Camarda, R. (1987). Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect, chapter Neural circuits for spatial attention and unilateral neglect (pp. 289-313). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
51. Rothkopf, C. A., Ballard, D. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2007). Task and context determine where you look [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(14):16, 1-20, http://journalofvision.org/7/14/16/, doi:10.1167/ 7.14.16.
52. Schumann, F., Einhäuser, W., Vockeroth, J., Bartl, K., Schneider, E., & König, P. (2008). Salient features in gaze-aligned recordings of human visual input during free exploration of natural environments. Journal of Vision, 8(14):12, 1-17, http://journalofvision.org/8/14/12/, doi:10.1167/8.14.12.
53. Steinman, R. M. (2003). Gaze control under natural conditions. In L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Tatler, B. W. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 7(14):4, 1-17, http://journalofvision.org/7/14/4/, doi:10.1167/7.14.4.
55. Tatler, B. W., Baddeley, R. J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45, 643-659.
56. Torralba, A. (2003). Modeling global scene factors in attention. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20, 1407-1418.
57. Turano, K. A., Geruschat, D. R., & Baker, F. H. (2003). Oculomotor strategies for the direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vision Research, 43, 333-346.
58. Unema, P. J. A., Pannasch, S., Joos, M., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2005). Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration. Visual Cognition, 12, 473-494.
59. Velichkovsky, B., Dornhoefer, S. M., Pannasch, S., & Unema, P. (2000). Visual fixations and level of attentional processing. Eye Tracking Research & Application, 79-85.
60. Wann, J. P., Rushton, S., & Mon-Williams, M. (1995). Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731-2736.
61. Watt, S. J., Akeley, K., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2005). Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision, 5(10):7, 834-862, http://journalofvision.org/5/10/7/, doi:10.1167/5.10.7.
62. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 5, 495-501.
63. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movement and vision. New York: Plenum Press.