Coarse-scale spatial and ecological analysis of tuberculosis in cattle: An investigation in Jalisco, Mexico

Geospatial Health

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-38

  Zendejas Martínez, Horacio ^a   Peterson, A Townsend ^b   Milián Suazo, Feliciano ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES FORESTALES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cattle; Ecological niche modeling; Geographical information systems; Mexico; Tuberculosis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS; CATTLE; CLASSIFICATION; DAIRYING; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MEXICO; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; PREVALENCE; TUBERCULIN TEST;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEXICO; MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS; PREVALENCE; TUBERCULIN TEST; TUBERCULOSIS, BOVINE;

EID: 58849093678     PISSN: 18271987     EISSN: 19707096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/gh.2008.229     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT, 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol Modell 162, 211-232.
2. Araújo MB, Whittaker RJ, Ladle RJ, Erhard M, 2005. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14, 529-538.
3. Díaz OF, Estrada CC, Arriaga DC, 2004. Métodos alternos en el diagnóstico de la tuberculosis bovina. 12a reunion anual del consejo técnico consultivo nacional de salud animal (CONASA). Pachuca Hidalgo, 6 de diciembre del 2004. Foro: tuberculosis y paratuberculosis en México, México, pp. 12-22.
4. Duffield BJ, Young DA, 1985. Survival of Mycobacterium bovis in defined environmental conditions. Vet Microbiol 10, 193-197.
5. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann H, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE, 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129-151.
6. Genov I, 1965. The effect of certain physical and chemical agents on Mycobacterium avium. Vet Med Nanki Sof 2, 97-107.
7. Grange JM, Yates MD, 1994. Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Vet Microbiol 40, 137-151.
8. Grinnell J, 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Amer Nat 51, 115-128.
9. Grinnell J, 1924. Geography and evolution. Ecology 5, 225-229.
10. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A, 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25, 1965-1978.
11. Maddock ECG, 1933. Studies on the survival time of the bovine tubercle bacillus in soil, soil and dung, in dung and on grass, with experiments on the preliminary treatment of infected organic matter and the cultivation of the organism. J Hyg 33, 103-117.
12. Milián-Suazo F, Huitrón MG, 2001. Diagnóstico situacional y epidemiológico de las campañas de control y erradicación de la tuberculosis y brucelosis bovina en el estado de Jalisco, 1995-1999. Comisión estatal para la erradicación de la tuberculosis bovina y brucelosis en el estado de Jalisco, Mexico. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, pp. 17-41.
13. Milián-Suazo F, Salman MD, Ramirez C, Payeur JB, Rhyan JC, Santillan M, 2000. Identification of tuberculosis in cattle slaughtered in Mexico. Am J Vet Res 61, 86-89.
14. Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Martinez-Meyer E, Brotons L, McClean C, Miles L, Segurado P, Dawson TP, Lees DC, 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J Biogeogr 33, 1704-1711.
15. Peterson AT, 2006a. Ecologic niche modeling and spatial patterns of disease transmission. Emerg Inf Dis 12, 1822-1826.
16. Peterson AT, 2006b. Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodiv Inf 3, 59-72.
17. Peterson AT, 2007. Ecological niche modelling and understanding the geography of disease transmission. Vet Ital 43, 393-400.
18. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE, 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190, 231-259.
19. Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE, 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, Canada.
20. Soberón J, Peterson AT, 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiv Inf 2, 1-10.
21. Stockwell D, Peters D, 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13, 143-158.
22. Stockwell DRB, Noble IR, 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Math Comp Simul 33, 385-390.
23. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek G, Midgley F, Hughes GO, Rouget M, 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Change Biol 11, 2234-2250.
24. UMD, 2001. AVHRR NDVI Data Set University of Maryland, http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml, College Park, Maryland, USA (Accessed: August 2006).
25. USGS, 2001. HYDRO1k Elevation Derivative Database, http://edcdaac.usgs.gov/gtopo30/hydro/ U.S. Geological Survey, Washington DC, USA (Accessed: August 2006).
26. WHO, 2008. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, finance. ISBN 978 9 24156354 3. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
27. Williams RS, Hoy WA, 1930. The viability of B. tuberculosis (bovinus) on pasture land, in stored faeces and in liquid manure. J Hyg 30, 413-419.
28. Young JS, Gormley E, Wellington EM, 2005. Molecular detection of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG (Pasteur) in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 1946-1952.