Effectiveness of advanced coating systems for mitigating blast effects on steel components

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

Volumn 98, Issue , 2008, Pages 85-94

  Chen, C ^a   Linzell, D G ^a   Alpman, E ^b   Long, L N ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Armor steel; Blast; Computational fluid dynamics; Finite element; Polyurea

Indexed keywords

ARMOR; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DYNAMICS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FLUID DYNAMICS; GAS DYNAMICS; MILITARY EQUIPMENT; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); STEEL; STRAIN RATE; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION); TOOL STEEL; UREA;

ARMOR STEEL; BARE STEELS; BLAST; BLAST EFFECTS; BLAST LOADINGS; BLAST MITIGATIONS; COATED STEELS; COATING MATERIALS; COATING SYSTEMS; DESIGN PARAMETERS; FINITE ELEMENT; LOADING TIME; LS-DYNA CODES; NUMERICAL STUDIES; PENN STATE UNIVERSITIES; POLYUREA; RESEARCH STUDIES; SELECTED STRAINS; STEEL COMPONENTS; STEEL PLATES;

STEEL RESEARCH;

BLASTING; COATING; COMPOSITE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MITIGATION; MODELING; STEEL;

EID: 58849086216     PISSN: 17433509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2495/SU080091     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Davidson JS, et al. Explosive testing of polymer retrofit masonry walls. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2004; 18(2): 100-106.
2. Amini MR, Isaacs JB, Nemat-Nasser S. Effect of polyurea on the dynamic response of steel plates. Proceedings of the 2006 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics. Saint Louis (MO, United States), 2006. p. 1323-1326.
3. Gupta NK, Iqbal MA, Sekhon GS. Experimental and numerical studies on the behavior of thin aluminum plates subjected to impact by blunt- and hemispherical-nosed projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 2006; 32: 1921-1944.
4. Børvik T, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the perforation of AA6005-T6 panels. Int J Impact Eng 2005; 32: 35-64.
5. Kurtaran H, Buyuk M, Eskandarian A. Design automation of a laminated armor for best impact performance using approximate optimization method. Int J Impact Eng 2003; 29: 397-406.
6. Roeder BA, Sun CT. Dynamic penetration of alumina/aluminum laminates: experiments and modeling. Int J Impact Eng 2001; 25: 169-185.
7. Børvik T, et al. Ballistic penetration of steel plates. Int J Impact Eng 1999; 22: 855-886.
8. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of seventh international symposium on ballistics. The Hague, 1983.
9. Zukas JA, Walters WP. Explosive effects and application. Maryland, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998.
10. Fuentes D, et al. Extensions of goal-oriented error estimation methods to simulations of highly-nonlinear response of shock-loaded elastomer-reinforced structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(37-40): 4659-4680.
11. Littlefield D. The penetration of steel targets in radial extent. Int J Impact Eng 1997; 19: 49-62.
12. Sarva SS, et al. Stress-strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer 2007; 48: 2208-2213.
13. Roland CM, et al. High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer 2007; 48: 574-578.
14. Hyde DW. Conventional weapons effects computer program, US Waterways Experiment Station Instructional Report SL-88-1. US Army Corps of Engineers, 1992.