Dynamic penetration of alumina/aluminum laminates: Experiments and modeling

International Journal of Impact Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 169-185

  Roeder, B A ^a   Sun, C T ^a  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPACT TESTING; RESIDUAL STRESSES; THERMAL STRESS; YIELD STRESS;

SOFTWARE PACKAGE ABAQUS; STRUCTURAL LAYERING;

LAMINATES;

EID: 0035255231     PISSN: 0734743X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00031-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wilkins M.L. Mechanics of penetration and perforation. Int J Eng Sci. 16:1978;793-807.
2. Woodward R.L. A simple one-dimensional approach to modeling ceramic composite armour defeat. Int J Impact Engng. 9(4):1990;455-473.
3. Hetherington J.G. The optimization of two component composite armours. Int J Impact Eng. 12(3):1992;409-414.
4. Cortes R.et al. Numerical modelling of normal impact on ceramic composite armours. Int J Impact Engng. 12(4):1992;639-651.
5. Woodward R.L.et al. A study of fragmentation in the ballistic impact of ceramics. Int J Impact Engng. 15(5):1994;605-618.
6. Zaera R., Sanchez-Galvez V. Analytic modelling of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic/metal lightweight armours. Int J Impact Engng. 21(3):1998;133-148.
7. Fellows N.A., Hezell P.J., Hethrington J.G. A note on the behind armour effects from perforated aluminum targets. Int J Impact Engng. 21(7):1998;589-595.
8. Mayseless M.et al. A note on the behind armour effects from perforated alumina/aluminum targets. J Appl Mech. 54:1987;373-378.
9. Woodward R.L.et al. Energy absorbtion in the failure of ceramic composite armours. Mater Forum. 13:1987;174-181.
10. Rapacki EJ et al. Ceramics for armors - a material system perspective. In 7th Annual TARDEC Ground Vehicle Survivability Symposium, Monterey, CA, 26-28 March 1996.
11. Shockey D.A.et al. Failure phenomenology of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods. Int J Impact Engng. 9(3):1990;263-275.
12. 3 ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Engng. 12(2):1992;167-187.
13. Sherman D., Ben-Shushan T. Quasi-static impact damage in confined ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Engng. 21(4):1998;245-265.
14. Woodward R.L., Cimpoeru S.J. A study of the performance of aluminum laminate targets. Int J Impact Engng. 21(3):1998;117-131.
15. Radin J., Goldsmith W. Normal projectile penetration and perforation of layered targets. Int J Impact Engng. 7(2):1988;229-259.
16. Anderson C.E., Bodner S.R. Ballistic impact. the status of analytical and numerical modeling Int J Impact Engng. 7(1):1988;9-35.
17. Chocron Benloulo I.S., Sanchez-Galvez V. A new analytic model to simulate impact onto ceramic/composite armors. Int J Impact Engng. 21(6):1998;461-471.
18. Florence AL. Interaction of projectiles and composite armor. Internal Report, US Army, March 1969.
19. den Reijer PC. Impact on ceramic faced armour. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1991.
20. Rosenberg Z., Yeshurun Y. The relationship between ballistic efficiency and compressive strength of ceramic tiles. Int J Impact Engng. 7(3):1988;357-362.
21. Department of Defense, Washington, District of Columbia. Military standardization handbook: metallic materials and elements for aerospace vehicle structures, June 1987.
22. Coors Ceramic Company, Golden, Colorado. Material Property Standard 990.
23. Jones RM. Mechanics of composite materials. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975. p. 239-284.
24. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island. ABAQUS Theory Manual, Version 5.8, 1998.
25. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island. ABAQUS/Explicit User's Manual, Version 5.8, 1998.