Rethinking partnerships with the aim of producing knowledge with practical relevance: A case study in the field of ecological restoration

Ecology and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2008, Pages

  Gonzalo Turpin, Héloïse ^a   Couix, Nathalie ^a   Hazard, Laurent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Conservation biology; Genetic resources; Local seeds; Mode of knowledge production; Native species; Problem finding; Pyrenees; Seed transfer zones; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ACTION PLAN; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; GENETIC RESOURCE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATIVE SPECIES; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

EID: 58749099319     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-02658-130253     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bawden, R. 1997. Learning to persist. A systemic view of development. Pages 1-5 in F. A. Stowell, J. Holloway, and R. I. Ison, editors. Systems for sustainability. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, New York, USA.
2. Blackmore, C. 2007. What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas: A theoretical overview. Environmental Science and Policy 10(6):512-525.
3. Cabin, R. J. 2007. Science-driven restoration: A square grid on a round earth? Restoration Ecology 15:1-7.
4. Chan, K. M. A., R. M. Pringle, J. A. I. Ranganathan, C. L. Boggs, Y. L. Chan, P. R. Ehrlich, P. K. Haff, N. E. Heller, K. A. R. I. Al Khafaji, and D. P. Macmynowsky. 2007. When agendas collide: Human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21:59-68.
5. Choi, Y. D. 2007. Restoration ecology to the future: A call for a new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15 (2):351-353
6. Cook, S. D. N., and J. S. Brown. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4):381-400.
7. Couix, N. 2002. Concerted approach to land-use management: developing common working procedures. A Cevennes case study (France). Land Use Policy 19(1):75-90.
8. Geist, C., and S. M. Glatowitsch. 1999. Reciprocal model for meeting ecological and human needs in restoration projects. Conservation Biology 13:970-979.
9. Gherardi, S. 2006. Organizational knowledge. The texture of workplace learning. Blackwell Publishing, London, UK.
10. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, London, UK.
11. Gobster, P. H., and R. B. Hull. 1999. The restoration and management of nature. A conference and forthcoming book explore restoration from the perspectives of the social sciences and humanities. Ecological Restoration 17:44-51.
12. Hagen, D., J. Aasetre, and L. Emmelin. 2002. Communicative approaches to restoration ecology: A case study from Dovre Moutain and Svalbard, Norway. Landscape Research 27:359-380.
13. Hessels, L. K. and H. van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37(4):740-760.
14. Higgs, E. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 1:338-348.
15. Higgs, E. 2005. The two-culture problem: Ecological restoration and the integration of knowledge. Restoration Ecology 13:159-164.
16. Hufford, K. M., and S. J. Mazer. 2003. Plant ecotypes: Genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(3):147-155.
17. LEARN-Group. 2000. Cow up a tree. Knowing and learning for change in agriculture. Case studies from industrialised countries. INRA Editions, Paris, France.
18. Light, A. 2000. Restoration, the value of participation and the risks of professionalization. Pages 163-181 in P. H. Gobster and R. B. Hull, editors, Restoring nature. Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
19. Light, A., and E. Higgs. 1996. The politics of ecological restoration. Environmental Ethics 18:227-47
20. Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. First edition. Sage Publications, London, UK.
21. Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3):249-73.
22. Pretty, J. N. 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23 (8):1247-1263.
23. Rhoades R. 1989. The role of farmers in the creation of appropriate technology. Pages 3-9 in R. Chambers, R. Pacey, and L. Thrupp, editors, Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK.
24. Robertson, D. P., and R. B. Hull. 2001. Beyond biology: Toward a more public ecology for conservation. Conservation Biology 15:970-979.
25. Robinson, J. G. 2006. Conservation biology and real-world conservation. Conservation Biology 20:658-669.
26. Röling, N., and M. A. E. Wagemakers, editors. 1998. Social learning for sustainable agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. Steyaert, P., and G. Ollivier. 2007. The European Water Framework Directive: How ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society 12(1): 25. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art25/.
28. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. First edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Temperton, V. M. 2007. The recent double paradigm shift in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 15(2):344-347.
30. van Aken, J. E. 2005. Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of Mode-2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management 16:19-36.