Longitudinal association of anthropometry with mammographic breast density in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 124, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1169-1177

  Reeves, Katherine W ^a,b,f   Stone, Roslyn A ^b   Medngno, Francesmary ^b   Ness, Roberta B ^b   Vogel, Victor G ^c   Weissfeld, Joel L ^b,d   Habel, Laurel A ^e   Sternfeld, Barbara ^e   Cauley, Jane A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Breast density; Longitudinal; Mammogram; Multiethnic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER RISK; CLIMACTERIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST; COHORT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 58749093754     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23996     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc., 2008.
2. Cooper R, Kaanders JH. Biological surrogate end-points in cancer trials: potential uses, benefits and pitfalls. Eur J Cancer 2005;41:1261-6.
3. Boyd NF, Green berg C, Lockwood G, Little L, Martin L, Byng J, Yaffe M, Tritchler D. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:488-96.
4. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A, Singh HR, Olson LK, Gate-wood O, Bassett LW, Wasilauskas C, Bush T, Barrett-Connor E. Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:262-9.
5. Grady D, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Hanes V, Ensrud K, Habel LA, Wallace R, Macer J, Cummings SR, Shepherd J. Effect of ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol on breast density in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2007; 14:391-6.
6. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk; a metaanalysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15:1159-69.
7. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Bio-markers Prev 1998;7:1133-44.
8. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, Fraser G, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Kushi L, Marshall JR, Miller AB, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152:514-27.
9. Bartow SA, Pathak DR, Mettler FA, Key CR, Pike MC. Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:813-9.
10. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB, Sadowsky NL, Kalisher L, Twaddle JA, Meyer JE, Henschke CI, Cole P. Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 1984;119:371-81.
11. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:653-62.
12. Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L. Anthropometric indices in relation to mammographic patterns among peri-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 1997;73:323-6.
13. Haars G, van Noord PA, van Gils CH, Grobbee DE, Peeters PH. Measurements of breast density; no ratio for a ratio. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2634-40.
14. Lam PB, Vacek PM, Geller BM, Muss HB. The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont. Cancer 2000;89:369-75.
15. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I, De Stavola BL, Perry N, Vinni-combe S, Swerdlow AJ, Hardy R, Kuh D. Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer 2003;89:852-9.
16. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L, Gonzalez-Keelan C, Climent C, Morales I. Macromastia: how much of it is fat? Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 64-8.
17. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Little LE, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL. The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1233-8.
18. Maskarinec G, Meng L, Ursin G. Ethnic differences in mammographic densities. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:959-65.
19. Habel LA, Capra AM, Oestreicher N, Greendale GA, Cauley JA, Bromberger J, Grandad CJ, Gold EB, Modugno F, Salane M, Quesen-berry C, Sternfeld B. Mammographic density in a multiethnic cohort. Menopause 2007;14:891-99.
20. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, Yaffe M, Minkin S. Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2086-92.
21. Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:732-9.
22. Sowers M, Crawford S, Sternfeld B, Morganstein D, Gold E, Greendale G, Evans D, Neer R, Matthews K, Sherman S, Lo A, Weiss G, et al. SWAN: a multicenter, multiethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition.In; Lobo RA, Kelsey JL, Marcus R, eds. Menopause: biology and pathobiology. San Diego. CA: Academic Press. 2000.175-88.
23. Haiman CA, Bernstein L, Berg D, Ingles SA, Salane M, Ursin G. Genetic determinants of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2002;4:R5.
24. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1087-92.
25. Benichou J, Byrne C, Capece LA, Carroll LE, Hurt-Mullen K, Pee DY, Salane M, Schairer C, Gail MH. Secular stability and reliability of measurements of the percentage of dense tissue on mammograms. Cancer Detect Prev 2003;27:266-74.
26. Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J, Wieand HS. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1541-8.
27. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvilli J J. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1879-86.
28. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 2004:4; 227-41.
29. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for non-response in Surveys. New York: Wiley, 2004.
30. Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, Little L, Minkin S, Yaffe M. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11:1048-53.
31. Jeffreys M, Warren R, Gunnell D, McCarron P, Smith GD. Life course breast cancer risk factors and adult breast density. Cancer Causes Control 2004; 15:947-55.
32. Key TJ, Allen NE, Verkasalo PK, Banks E. Energy balance and cancer: the role of sex hormones. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:81-9.
33. Lorincz AM, Sukumar S. Molecular links between obesity and breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2006;13:279-92.
34. Reeves KW. The effects of anthropometry and angiogenesis on breast cancer etiology, Ph.D. Dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 2008.