메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 375-395

The evidence for relativism

Author keywords

Circumstance of evaluation; Context of use; Contextualism; David Kaplan; David Lewis; Epistemic modals; Future contingents; Indexicality; Knowledge attributions; Relativism; Taste predicates

Indexed keywords


EID: 58549111602     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9281-7     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (77)

References (31)
  • 1
    • 84937334363 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • You don't say
    • K. Bach 2001 You don't say Synthese 128 15 44
    • (2001) Synthese , vol.128 , pp. 15-44
    • Bach, K.1
  • 3
    • 33645117948 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epistemic modals in context
    • G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.) Oxford: OUP
    • Egan, A., Hawthorne, J., & Weatherson, B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford: OUP. Available at http://www.brian.weatherson.net/papers.html
    • (2005) Contextualism in Philosophy
    • Egan, A.1    Hawthorne, J.2    Weatherson, B.3
  • 4
    • 58549105029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • M. García-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (Eds.)
    • Einheuser, I. (2008). Varieties of relativism. In M. García- Carpintero & M. Kölbel (Eds.).
    • (2008) Varieties of Relativism
    • Einheuser, I.1
  • 5
    • 13844274282 scopus 로고
    • Does tense logic rest on a mistake?
    • Oxford: Clarendon Press
    • Evans, G. (1979). Does tense logic rest on a mistake? In Collected papers (1985) (pp. 341-363). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • (1979) Collected Papers , pp. 341-363
    • Evans, G.1
  • 6
    • 33749555591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness
    • D.G. Fara 2000 Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness Philosophical Topics 28 45 81
    • (2000) Philosophical Topics , vol.28 , pp. 45-81
    • Fara, D.G.1
  • 9
    • 0002136432 scopus 로고
    • Demonstratives
    • Clarendon Press Oxford
    • Kaplan D. (1977). Demonstratives. In: Almog J., et al. (eds). Themes from Kaplan. Oxford, Clarendon Press
    • (1977) Themes from Kaplan
    • Kaplan, D.1    Almog, J.2
  • 12
    • 58549106054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • . Moral relativism
    • D. Westerstahl & T. Tännsjö (Eds.) Göteborg University
    • Kölbel, M. (2005). Moral relativism. In: D. Westerstahl & T. Tännsjö (Eds.), Lectures on relativism. Göteborg University.
    • (2005) Lectures on Relativism
    • Kölbel, M.1
  • 13
    • 58549107712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to spell out genuine relativism and how to defend indexical relativism
    • M. Kölbel 2007 How to spell out genuine relativism and how to defend indexical relativism International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 281 288
    • (2007) International Journal of Philosophical Studies , vol.15 , pp. 281-288
    • Kölbel, M.1
  • 14
    • 32944462886 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste
    • P. Lasersohn 2005 Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste Linguistics and Philosophy 28 643 686
    • (2005) Linguistics and Philosophy , vol.28 , pp. 643-686
    • Lasersohn, P.1
  • 16
    • 0003354709 scopus 로고
    • Index, context, and content
    • S. Kanger & S. Öhman (Eds.) Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Lewis (1998)
    • Lewis, D. (1980). Index, context, and content. In: S. Kanger & S. Öhman (Eds.), Philosophy and grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Reprinted in Lewis (1998).
    • (1980) Philosophy and Grammar
    • Lewis, D.1
  • 19
    • 32944461398 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Future contingents and relative truth
    • J. [tmp] MacFarlane 2003 Future contingents and relative truth Philosophical Quarterly 53 321 336
    • (2003) Philosophical Quarterly , vol.53 , pp. 321-336
    • MacFarlane, J.1
  • 21
    • 33646924231 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The assessment sensitivity of knowledge attributions
    • Oxford University Press Oxford
    • MacFarlane J. (2005b). The assessment sensitivity of knowledge attributions. In: Gendler T.S., Hawthorne J. (eds). Oxford studies in epistemology. Oxford, Oxford University Press
    • (2005) Oxford Studies in Epistemology
    • MacFarlane, J.1    Gendler, T.S.2    Hawthorne, J.3
  • 23
    • 58549086748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonindexical contextualism
    • 10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2
    • J. [tmp] MacFarlane 2008 Nonindexical contextualism Synthese 10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2
    • (2008) Synthese
    • MacFarlane, J.1
  • 24
    • 37249090518 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Epistemic modals are assessment-sensitive
    • (forthcoming) B. Weatherson & A. Egan (Eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • MacFarlane, J. (forthcoming). Epistemic modals are assessment-sensitive. In B. Weatherson & A. Egan (Eds.), Epistemic modals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Epistemic Modals
    • MacFarlane, J.1
  • 26
    • 84937336384 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is said
    • F. Recanati 2001 What is said Synthese 128 75 91
    • (2001) Synthese , vol.128 , pp. 75-91
    • Recanati, F.1
  • 27
    • 33645120687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Contextualism and relativism
    • M. Richard 2004 Contextualism and relativism Philosophical Studies 119 215 242
    • (2004) Philosophical Studies , vol.119 , pp. 215-242
    • Richard, M.1
  • 29
    • 0011088660 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Truthfulness and relevance
    • D. Wilson D. Sperber 2002 Truthfulness and relevance Mind 111 584 632
    • (2002) Mind , vol.111 , pp. 584-632
    • Wilson, D.1    Sperber, D.2
  • 31
    • 61449378864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On being in a quandary
    • C. Wright 2001 On being in a quandary Mind 110 45 98
    • (2001) Mind , vol.110 , pp. 45-98
    • Wright, C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.