Editor's comments

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-10

  Hillman, Amy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58549111404     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2009.35713263     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Cummings, T. 2008. Presidential address: Quest for an engaged Academy. Academy of Management Review, 32: 355-360.
2. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28: 371-382.
3. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
4. Hambrick, D. 1994. Presidential address: What if the Academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19: 11-16.
5. Hillman, A. 2005. Reflections on service orientations, community, and professions. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 185-188.
6. Huff, A. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Kacperczyk, A., & Walsh, I. 2006. The diffusion of Freeman's stakeholder theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
8. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71-102.
10. Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 65-94.
11. Treviño, L. K. 2008. Editor's comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 8-10.