How do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke?

Stroke

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 2146-2151

  Dorman, Paul J ^a   Dennis, Martin ^b   Sandercock, Peter ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Health status; Neuropsychological tests; Quality of life; Stroke outcome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0032860802     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2146     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Dorman PJ, Waddell FM, Slattery J, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997;28:1876-1882.
2. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke. 1996; 27:1812-1816.
3. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.
4. Ware JE, Donald Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
5. Medical Outcomes Trust. SF-36 Health Survey: Scoring Manual for English-Language Adaptations. Boston, Mass: Medical Outcomes Trust; 1994.
6. Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the EuroQol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:169-180.
7. Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, Kohler B. Using the SF-36 and EuroQol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:195-204.
8. Dorman PJ, Slattery JM, Farrell B, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG, and the United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. A randomised comparison of the EuroQol and SF-36 after stroke. BMJ. 1997; 315:461.
9. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 1997; 349:1569-1582.
10. Dorman PJ, Slattery JM, Farrell B, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG, and the United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial (IST). A qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 after stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:63-68.
11. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1989.
12. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622-629.
13. Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke. 1994;25:2391-2397.
14. Dorman PJ, Waddell FM, Slattery JM, Dennis MS, Sandercock PAG. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke. 1997;28:1883-1887.
15. Ware JE. Measures for a New Era of Health Assessment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1992.
16. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:835-840.
17. Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:221-226.
18. O'Mahoney PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OFW. Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? Age Ageing. 1998;27:19-22.
19. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1993; 2:369-395.
20. Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53: 46-50.