A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact

Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 373-379

  Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,b   Schubert, Andreas ^b   Thijs, Bart ^a   Debackere, Koenraad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Relational charts; Scientometric indicators; Subject normalization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; EUROPE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH SUBJECT; UNIVERSITY;

BIBLIOGRAPHY AS TOPIC; BIBLIOMETRICS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 58549084560     PISSN: 0004069X     EISSN: 16614917     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00005-008-0040-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Braun T. and Glänzel W. (1990): United Germany: The new scientific superpower? Scientometrics, 19, 513-521.
2. Duda R. O. and Hart P. E. (1973): Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York.
3. Glänzel W. (1996): The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology. Scientometrics, 35, 167-176.
4. Glänzel W. (1997): On the reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes. Scientometrics, 40, 481-492.
5. Glänzel W. (2000): Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48, 121-150. (Correction: Scientometrics, 49, 2000, 357)
6. Glänzel W. (2007): Characteristic scores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. J. Informetrics, 1, 92-102.
7. Glänzel W. (2008): On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. Scientometrics, 77, 187-196.
8. Glänzel W. and Schubert A. (1988): Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. J. Information Sci., 14, 123-127.
9. Glänzel W. and Schubert A. (1992): Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 25, 373-380.
10. Glänzel W. and Schubert A. (2003): A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56, 357-367.
11. Glänzel W., Telcs A. and Schubert A. (1984): Characterization by Truncated moments and its application to Pearson-type distributions. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verwandte Gebiete, 66, 173-183 (correction: Probability Theory and Related Fields, 74, 1987, 317.)
12. Moed H. F. (1996): Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: A first over view. Scientometrics, 35, 177-191.
13. Moed H. F., De Bruin R. E. and Van Leeuwen T. N. (1995): New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381-422.
14. Schubert A. and Braun T. (1986): Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative-assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9, 281-291.
15. Schubert A. and Glänzel W. (2007): A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. J. Informetrics, 1, 179-184.
16. Thijs B. and W. Glänzel W. (2008): A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74, 223-236.
17. Thijs B. and Glänzel W. (2009): A structural analysis of benchmarks on different bibliometric indicators for European research institutes based on their research profile, Scientometrics (in press).
18. Van Raan A. F. J. (2006): Statistical properties of Bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations. J. Am. Soc. Information Sci. Technol., 57, 408-430.
19. Van Raan A. F. J. (2006): Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67, 491-502.