Does the UTTO model of technology transfer fit public sector healthcare services?

International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 171-187

  Savory, Clive ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

innovation hub; Nation Health Service; Technological innovation; technology transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 58449136802     PISSN: 02198770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219877006000740     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker, J. (1999). Creating Knowledge Creating Wealth: Realising the Economic Potential of Public Sector Research Establishments. A report by John Baker to the Minister for Science and the Financial Secretary to the Treasury. HM Treasury. London, UK.
2. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M. et al. (2001). Organizational structure as a determinant of academic patent and licensing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 1-2: 21-35. (Pubitemid 33809463)
3. Black, N. (2001). Evidence based policy: Proceed with care. British Medical Journal, 323, 7307: 275-278. (Pubitemid 32729118)
4. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 4-5: 627-655.
5. Colyvas, J. and Crow, M. et al. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48, 1: 61-72. (Pubitemid 34434355)
6. Culyer, A. (1994). Supporting Research and Development in the NHS. A report to the minister for health by a research and development task force chaired by Professor Anthony Culyer. HMSO. London, UK.
7. Debackere, K. and Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34, 3: 321-342. (Pubitemid 40612709)
8. Deschamps, J. P. (2003). Innovation and Leadership. The International Handbook on Innovation. L. V. Shavinina. Amsterdam. Boston, Elsevier Science, xxviii: 1171.
9. Djellal, F. and Gallouj, F. (2005). Mapping innovation dynamics in hospitals. Research Policy, 34, 6: 817-835. (Pubitemid 41078308)
10. DoH (2002). The NHS as an Innovative Organisation, a Framework and Guidance on the Management of Intellectual Property. Department of Health. Report No. 29030. London, UK.
11. DTI (2004). Knowledge Transfer and Public Sector Research Establishments (PSREs). Department of Trade and Industry. London, UK.
12. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 2: 109-123.
13. Fujisue, K. (1998). Promotion of academia-industry cooperation in Japan - Establishing the "law of promoting technology transfer from university to industry" in Japan. Technovation, 18, 6-7: 371-381. (Pubitemid 128435937)
14. Goldfarb, B. and Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32, 4: 639-658.
15. Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9.
16. HITF (2004). Better Health Through Partnership: A Programme for Action. Health Industries Task Force, Department of Health, Report No. 265090. London, UK.
17. Howells, J. (1997). Rethinking the market-technology relationship for innovation. Research Policy, 25, 8: 1209-1219. (Pubitemid 127412754)
18. Jones, M. (2001). An interpretive method for the formative evaluation of an electronic patient record system. 8th European Conference on IT Evaluation, Oriel College, Oxford, UK, MCIL.
19. Lundvall, B.-A. (1999). Technology policy in the learning economy. Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. D. Archibugi, J. Howells and J. Michie, Cambridge, England, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-34.
20. Markman, G. D., Phan, P. H. et al. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 2: 241-263. (Pubitemid 39473695)
21. Marmot, M. G. (2004). Evidence based policy or policy based evidence? British Medical Journal, 328, 7445: 906-907. (Pubitemid 38496975)
22. Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Englewood Cliffs; London, Prentice Hall, Prentice-Hall International.
23. Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19, 3: 193-214.
24. Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 1-2: 13-19. (Pubitemid 33809462)
25. NHS Innovations (2004). NHS Innovations Annual Report 2003/2004. NHS Innovations. London, UK.
26. Office of Science and Technology (2000). The Government Response to the Baker Report: Creating Knowledge, Creating Wealth: Realising the Economic Potential of Public Sector Research Establishments. HM Treasury. London, UK.
27. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage.
28. Reddy, N. M. and Zhao, L. M. (1990). International technology-transfer - A review. Research Policy, 19, 4: 285-307.
29. Rogers, H., Silvestor, K. et al. (2004). NHS Modernisation Agency's way to improve health care. British Medical Journal, 328: 463. (Pubitemid 38250611)
30. Rushmer, R., Kelly, D. et al. (2004). Introducing the learning practice - I. The characteristics of learning organizations in primary care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10, 3: 375-386. (Pubitemid 39093745)
31. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. et al. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 1: 27-48.
32. UK Government (2000). The NHS Plan, A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform, HMSO. London.
33. Worthington, F. (2004). Management, change and culture in the NHS: Rhetoric and reality. Clinician in Management, 12, 2: 55-67. (Pubitemid 38480097)