Nuclear futures: Anticipatory knowledge, expert judgment, and the lack that cannot be filled

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 551-560

  Gusterson, Hugh ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; GEOPOLITICS; NUCLEAR WEAPON;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58449117668     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234208X370639     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ackland, Len 2002. Making a Real Killing: Rocky Flats and the Nuclear West. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
2. Brumfiel, Geoff 2006. The Next Nuke. Nature, 6 July, 18-21.
3. Collins, Harry 1992. Replicating the TEA-laser: maintaining scientific knowledge. In Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, pp. 51-78. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Collins, Harry 2001. Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science,31 (1), 71-85.
5. Dalton, Russell, Paula Garb, Nicholas Lovrich, John Pierce and Paul Whiteley 1996. Critical Masses: Nuclear Weapons Production and Environmental Destruction in the United States and Russia.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Doing, Park 2004. 'Lab hands' and the 'Scarlet O': epistemic politics and (scientific) labor. Social Studies of Science, 34(3), 299-323.
7. Eden, Lynn 2004. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Fleck, John 2008. LANL's unclear nuclear future. Albuquerque Journal, 9 March.
9. Garwin, Richard 2007. The Reliable Replacement Warhead. Testimony of 29 March 2007 for the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations.
10. Gerber, Michele Stenehjem 1992. On the Home Front: the Cold War Legacy of the Hanford Nuclear Site. University of Nebraska Press.
11. Goodwin, Bruce 2007. Interview: at the workbench. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July/August, 46-47.
12. Horning, Susan Schmidt 2004. Recording engineers, tacit knowledge and the art of controlling sound. Social Studies of Science,34 (5), 703-731.
13. Kintisch, Eli 2006. U.S. study finds slower breakdown of plutonium in stockpiled weapons. Science, 8 December.
14. Levine, Haninah 2007. Birth of a notion. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July/August.
15. Loeb, Paul 1986. Nuclear Culture: Living and Working in the World's Largest Atomic Complex. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
16. MacKenzie, Donald and Graham Spinardi 1995. Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology, 101 (1), 44-99.
17. Masco, Joe 2004. Nuclear technoaesthatics: sensory politics from trinity to the virtual bomb in Los Alamos. American Ethnologist, 31(3), 349-373.
18. McKinley, Wes and Caron Balkany 2004. The Ambushed Grand Jury: How the Justice Department Covered up Government Nuclear Crime: and How We Caught Them Red-Handed. Apex Press.
19. Polanyi, Michael 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.
20. Sunder Rajan, Kaushik 2006. Biocapital: the Constitution of Post-genomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Tartar, Bruce 2007. Comments on the RRW. AAAS press conference, Rayburn Office building, 24 April.
22. Vogel, Kathleen 2006. Bioweapons proliferation: where science studies and public, policy collide. Social Studies of Science, 36(5), 659-690.