Analogical reasoning in description logics

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5327 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 330-347

  D'amato, Claudia ^a   Fanizzi, Nicola ^a   Esposito, Floriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA DESCRIPTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; QUERY PROCESSING;

ANALOGICAL REASONING; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; DISSIMILARITY MEASURES; INDUCTIVE METHOD; INSTANCE BASED LEARNING; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEMBERSHIP QUERY; ONTOLOGY CONSTRUCTION;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 58449109184     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89765-1_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
2. Baader, .F., Küsters, R.: Non-standard inferences in description logics: The story so far. In:Gabbay, D., Goncharov, S.S., Zakharyasehev, M. (eds.) Mathematical Problems from Applied Logic. New Logics for the XXIst Century. International Mathematical Series, vol. 4. Kluwer/Plenum Publishers (2005)
3. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Molitor, R.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Dean, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 96-101. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)
4. Bacchus, R: Lp, a logic for representing and reasoning with statistical knowledge. Computational Intelligence 6, 209-231 (1990)
5. Bock, H.: Analysis of Symbolic Data: Exploratory Methods for Extracting Statistical Information from Complex Data. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
6. Bock, H., Diday, E.: Analysis of symbolic data: exploratory methods for extracting statistical information from complex data. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
7. Borgida, A., Walsh, T, Hirsh, H.: Towards measuring similarity in description logics. In:Working Notes of the International Description Logics Workshop, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Edinburgh, UK (2005)
8. Brandt, S., Kiisters, R., Turhan, A.-Y.: Approximation and difference in description logics. In: Fensel, D., Giunchiglia, F., McGuinness, D., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation, pp. 203-214. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)
9. Bright, M.W., Hurson, A.R., Pakzad, S.H.: Automated resolution of semantic heterogeneity in multidatabases. ACM Transaction on Database Systems 19(2), 212-253 (1994)
10. Cohen, W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the CLASSIC description logic. In: Torasso, P., Doyle, J., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 121-133. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)
11. d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F: A dissimilarity measure for the ALC description logic. In: Bouquet, P., Tummarello, G. (eds.) Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop SWAP 2005, Trento, Italy, vol. 166, CEUR (2005)
12. d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F: A semantic similarity measure for expressive description logics. In: Pettorossi, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale, CILC 2005, Rome, Italy (2005)
13. d'Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: A dissimilarity measure for ALC concept descriptions. In: Haddad, H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium of Applied Computing, SAC 2006, Dijon, France, pp. 1695-1699. ACM, New York (2006)
14. d'Amato, C, Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F: Reasoning by analogy in description logics through instance-based learning. In: Tummarello, G., Bouquet, P., Signore, O. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives, 3rd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, SWAP 2006, Pisa, Italy, vol. 201, CEUR (2006)
15. d'Aquin, M., Lieber, J., Napoli, A.: Decentralized ease-based reasoning for the Semantic Web. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 142-155. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
16. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Deduction in concept languages: From subsumption to instance checking. Journal of Logic and Computation 4(4), 423-452 (1994)
17. Emde, W., Wettschereck, D.: Relational instance-based learning. In: Saitta, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference, ICML 1996, pp. 122-130. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1996)
18. Esposito, F., Fanizzi, N., Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Semeraro, G.: Knowledge-intensive induction of terminologies from metadata. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harme-len, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 441-455. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
19. Panizzi, N., d'Amato, C: A declarative kernel for ALC concept descriptions. In: Esposito, P., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds.) ISMIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4203, pp. 322-331. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
20. Fanizzi, N., d'Amato, C: A similarity measure for the ALN description logic. In: Proceedings of Convegno Italiano di Logica Computazionale, CILC 2006, Bari, Italy (2006), http://cilc2006.di.uniba.it/download/earnera/15-Fanizzi- CILC06.pdf
21. Fanizzi, N., d'Amato. C: Inductive concept retrieval and query answering with semantic knowledge bases through kernel methods. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4692, pp. 148-155. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
22. Gora, G., Wojna, A.: Riona: A classifier combining rule induction and k-nn method with automated selection of optimal neighbourhood. In: Elomaa, T., Mannila, H., Toivonen, H. (eds.) ECML 2002. LNCS. vol. 2430, pp. 111-123. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
23. Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353-367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
24. Hitzler, P., Vrandečić, D.: Resolution-based approximate reasoning for OWL DL. In: Gil, Y, Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 383-397. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
25. Mantay, T.: Commonality-based ABox retrieval. Technical Report FBI-HH-M-291/2000, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Hamburg, Germany (2000)
26. Mitchell, T: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)
27. Resnik, P.: Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 95-130 (1999)
28. Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artificial Intelligence 48(1), 1-26 (1991)
29. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psycological Review 84(4), 327-352 (1997)
30. Witten, IH., Frank, E.: Data Mining, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)