Sexual dimorphism in the African legless skink subfamily Acontiinae (Reptilia: Scincidae)

African Zoology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 192-201

  Heideman, N J L ^a   Daniels, S R ^b   Mashinini, P L ^a   Mokone, M E ^a   Thibedi, M L ^a   Hendricks, M G J ^c   Wilson, B A ^d   Douglas, R M ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

^d Western Cape Education Department   (South Africa)

^e NATIONAL MUSEUM   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Acontiinae; Legless skinks; Sexual size and shape dimorphism

Indexed keywords

DIET; FECUNDITY; MICROHABITAT; REPTILE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SIZE;

ACONTIAS; ACONTIINAE; ACONTOPHIOPS; REPTILIA; SCINCIDAE; TYPHLOSAURUS;

EID: 58449102727     PISSN: 15627020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3377/1562-7020-43.2.192     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BOOKSTEIN, F.L. 1989. 'Size and shape': a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 173-180.
2. BRANCH, W.R. 1998. Field Guide to the Snakes and other Reptiles of Southern Africa, 3rd edn. Struik, Cape Town.
3. BROADLEY, D.G. & GREER, A.E. 1969. A revision of the genus Acontias Cuvier (Sauria: Scincidae). Arnoldia. Rhodesia 4: 1-29.
4. CADIMA, J.F. & JOLLIFFE, C.L. 1996. Size-and shape-related principal component analysis. Biometrics 52: 710-716.
5. DANIELS, S.R, HEIDEMAN, N.J.L., HENDRICKS, M.G.J., MOKONE, M.E. & CRANDALL, K. 2006. Taxonomic subdivisions within the fossorial skink subfamily Acontinae (Sauria: Scincidae:) reconsidered: a multi-locus perspective. Zoologica Scripta 35(4): 353-362.
6. DELêTRE, M. & MEASEY, G.J. 2004. Sexual selection vs ecological causation in a sexually dimorphic caecilian, Schistometopum thomense (Amphibia Gymnophiona Caecilididae). Ethology Ecology & Evolution 16:243-253.
7. FAIRBAIRN, D.J. 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 659-687.
8. FITCH, H.S. 1981. Sexual size differences in reptiles. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publications 70: 1-72.
9. FITZSIMONS, V.F.M. 1943. The lizards of South Africa. Transvaal Museum Memoirs 1: 1-528.
10. GANS, C. 1960. Studies on amphisbaenids (Amphisbaenia: Reptilia). 1. A taxonomic revision of the Trogonophinae and a functional interpretation of the amphisbaenid adaptive patterns. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin 119(3): 129-204.
11. GANS, C. 1969. Amphisbaenians - reptiles specialized for a burrowing existence. Endeavor 28: 146-151.
12. GANS, C. 1978. The characteristics and affinities of the Amphisbaenia. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 34: 347-416.
13. GIBBONS, J.W. & LOVICH, J.E. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in turtles with emphasis on the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta). Herpetological Monograph 4: 1-29.
14. GIL, M.J., GUERRERO, F. & PEREZ-MELLADO, D.V.. 1993. Observations in morphometrics and ecology in Blanus cinereus (Reptilia: Amphisbaenidae). Journal of Herpetology 27: 205-209.
15. HALLIDAY, T. & TEJEDO, M. 1995. Intersexual selection and alternative mating behavior. In: Amphibian Biology Vol. 2, (eds) H. Heatwole & B.K. Sullivan, pp. 419-468. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.
16. HUEY, R.B., PIANKA, E.R., EGAN, M.E. & COONS, L.W. 1974. Ecological shifts in sympatry: Kalahari fossorial lizards (Typhlosaurus). Ecology 55: 304-316.
17. JONES, D.T., LOADER, S.P. & GOWER, D.J. 2006. Trophic ecology of East African caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), and their impact on forest soil invertebrates. Journal of Zoology 269: 117-126.
18. LE GALLIARD, J.F., MASSOT, M., LANDYS, M.M, MEYLAND, S. & CLOBERT, J. 2006. Ontogenetic sources of variation in sexual size dimorphism in a viviparous lizard. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 690-704.
19. NAVAS, C.A., ANTONIAZZI, M.M., CARVALHO, J.E., CHAUI-BERLINK, J.G., JAMES, R.S., JARED, C., KOHLSDORF, T., PAI-SILVA, M.D. & WILSON, R.S. 2004. Morphological and physiological specialization for digging in amphisbaenians, an ancient lineage of fossorial vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 2433-2441.
20. OLSSON, M., SHINE, R., WAPSTRA, E., UJVARI, B. & MADSEN, T. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection. Evolution 56(7): 1538-1542.
21. ROHLF, F.J. & BOOKSTEIN, F.L. 1987. A comment on shearing as a method for 'size correction'. Systematic Zoology 36(4): 356-367.
22. SCHWARZKOPF, L. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in body shape without sexual dimorphism in body size in water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii). Herpetologica 61(2): 116-123.
23. SHINE, R. 1985. The evolution of viviparity in reptiles: an ecological analysis. In Biology of the Reptilia, (eds) C. Gans & F. Billet. Vol. 15, pp. 605-694. C. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
24. SHINE, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Quarterly Review in Biology 64: 419-440.
25. SHINE, R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism in snakes revisited. Copeia 1994: 326-346.
26. SOMERS, K.M. (1986). Multivariate allometry and removal of size from principal components analysis. Systematic Zoology 35(3): 359-368.
27. STAMPS, J.A. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth after maturity. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 50: 123-145.
28. TEODECKI, E.E., BRODIE, JR., E.D., FORMANOWICZ, JR., D.R. & NUSSBAUM, R.A. 1998. Head dimorphism and burrowing speed in the African caecilian Schistometopum thomense (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Herpetologica 54(2): 154-160.
29. WEBB, J.K., SHINE, R., BRANCH, W.R. & HARLOW, P.S. 2000. Life underground: food habits and reproductive biology of two amphisbaenian species from southern Africa. Journal of Herpetology 34: 510-516.