Analysis of reduction in effective capacities of high-occupancy vehicle lanes related to traffic behavior

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2065, 2008, Pages 47-53

  Guin, Angshuman ^a   Hunter, Michael ^a   Guensler, Randall ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; VEHICLES;

% REDUCTIONS; ATLANTA; CONSTRAINED FLOW; EFFECTIVE CAPACITY; FLOW CONDITION; HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLES; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SAFETY CONCERNS; TRAFFIC BEHAVIOR; VEHICLE DRIVERS;

HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES;

EID: 58449093163     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2065-07     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Henderson, D. State of the Practice in High-Occupancy Vehicle System Performance Monitoring. In Transportation Research Record 1856, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 152-160.
2. Gaul, T., and D. Henderson. The Los Angeles County HOV Performance Program Study. Presented at Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual. Meeting and Exhibit and ITE District 6 Annual Meeting, Seattle, Wash., Aug. 2003.
3. Dahlgren, J. In What Situations Do High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Perform Better Than General Purpose Lanes? University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
4. Skowronek, D. A., S. E. Ranft, and A. S. Cothron. An Evaluation of Dallas-Area HOVLanes, Year 2002. Report No. TX-02/4961-6. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, and Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2002.
5. Nee, J., J. Ishimaru, and M. E. Hallenbeck. Evaluation Tools for HOV Lane Performance Monitoring. Washington State Transportation Center, Washington State Department of Transportation and FHWA Report, 1999.
6. Brown, W. W., and E. L. Jacobson. HOV Evaluation and Monitoring-Phase III. Report No. WA-RD 414.1. Washington State Transportation Center, Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., 1996.
7. Etchart, G., M. Hansen, M. Benuska, W. W. Brown, and C. Ulberg. HOV Evaluation and Monitoring - Phase II. Report. No. WA-RD 393.1. Washington State Transportation Center, Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., Aug. 1995.
8. Hall, L., M. Castro, A. Zepeda, I. Bhattacharya, R. Fuertes, J. Magbitang, M. Maltez, and J. Morales. 2005 Bay Area HOV Lanes. California Department of Transportation Report, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2006.
9. Swisher, M., W. L. Eisele, D. Ungemah, and G. D. Goodin. Life-Cycle Graphical. Representation of Managed High-Occupancy Vehicle Lane Evolution. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1856, Transportation Research Board of the National. Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 161-167.
10. Menendez, M., and C. F. Daganzo. Effects of HOV Lanes on Freeway Bottlenecks. In Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 8, October 2007, pp. 809-822.
11. NCHRP Report 414: HOV Systems Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
12. Varaiya, P. What We've Learned About Highway Congestion. University of California Transportation Center Report, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
13. Siuhi, S., and R. N. Mussa. Simulation Analysis of Truck-Restricted and HOV Lanes. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2007.
14. Xu, G., X. P. Huang, and P. Pant. Method for Estimating Capacity Reduction, in High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lane Ingress and Egress Sections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1678, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 107-115.