Identification of structurally conserved residues of proteins in absence of structural homologs using neural network ensemble

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 204-210

  Pugalenthi, Ganesan ^a   Tang, Ke ^b   Suganthan, P N ^a   Chakrabarti, Saikat ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

SUGARCANE RAMU STUNT DISEASE PHYTOPLASMA;

EID: 58349085114     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn618     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
2. Anfinsen,C.B. (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 181, 223-230.
3. Berman,H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
4. Bhaduri,A. et al. (2004) PASS2: An automated database of protein alignments organised as structural superfamilies. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 35.
5. Chakrabarti,S. and Sowdhamini,R. (2003) Regions of minimal structural variation among members of protein domain superfamilies: Application to remote homology detection and modeling using distant relationships. FEBS Lett., 569, 31-36.
6. Chakrabarti,S. et al. (2003) SMoS: A database of structural motifs of superfamily. Protein Eng., 16, 791-793.
7. Chakrabarti,S. et al. (2006) SSToSS - sequence-structural templates of single-member superfamilies. In Sillico Biol., 6 0029.
8. Chothia,C. (1992) Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature, 357, 543-544.
9. Greene,L.H. et al. (2001) Role of conserved residues in structure and stability: Tryptophans of human serum retinol-binding protein, a model for the lipocalin superfamily. Protein Sci., 10, 2301-2316.
10. Johnson,M.S. and Overington,J.P. (1993) A structural basis for sequence comparisons. An evaluation of scoring methodologies. J. Mol. Biol. 233,716-738.
11. Kawashima,S. et al. (1999) AAindex: Amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 368-369.
12. Liu,Y. and Yao,X. (1997) Negatively correlated neural networks can produce best ensembles. Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst., 4 176-185.
13. Liu,Y. and Yao,X. (1999a) Ensemble learning via negative correlation. Neural Netw., 12, 1399-1404.
14. Liu,Y. and Yao,X. (1999b) Simultaneous training of negatively correlated neural networks in an ensemble. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern., 29, 716-725.
15. Lopez-Hernandez,E. and Serrano,L. (1996) Structure of the transition state for folding of the 129 aa protein chey resembles that of a smaller protein, ci2. Fold. Des., 1, 43-55.
16. McGuffin,L.J. et al. (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics, 16, 404-405.
17. Mirny,L. and Shakhnovich,E. (2001) Evolutionary conservation of the folding nucleus. J. Mol. Biol., 308, 123-129.
18. Mizuguchi,K. et al. (1998) JOY: Protein sequence-structure representation and analysis. Bioinformatics, 14, 617-623.
19. Neuwald,A.F. et al. (1995) Gibbs motif sampling: Detection of bacterial outer membrane protein repeats. Protein Sci., 4, 1618-1632.
20. Paiardini,A. et al. (2005) CAMPO, SCR_FIND and CHC_FIND: A suite of web tools for computational structural biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W50-W55.
21. Peters,B. et al. (2006) Identification of similar regions of protein structures using integrated sequence and structure analysis tools. BMC Struct. Biol., 6, 4.
22. Pugalenthi,G. et al. (2007) SMotif: A server for structural motifs in proteins. Bioinformatics. 23, 637-638.
23. Pugalenthi,G. et al. (2008a) MegaMotifBase: A database of structural motifs in protein families and superfamilies. Nucleic Acid Res., 36, D218-D221.
24. Pugalenthi,G. et al. (2008b) Identification of catalytic residues from protein structure using support vector machine with sequence and structural features. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 367, 630634.
25. Sandhya,S. et al. (2008) CUSP: An algorithm to distinguish structurally conserved and unconserved regions in protein domain alignments and its application in the study of large length variations. BMC Struct. Biol., 8, 28.
26. Saqi,M.A. and Sternberg,M.J. (1994) Identification of sequence motifs from a set of proteins with related function. Protein Eng., 7 165-171.
27. Shapiro,J. and Brutlag,D. (2004) FoldMiner: Structural motif discovery using an improved superposition algorithm. Protein Sci., 13, 278-294.
28. Thompson,J.D. et al. (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673-4680.
29. Toyama,A (2004) Catalytic and structural role of a metal-free histidine residue in bovine Cu-Zn Superoxide dismutase Biochemistry, 43 4670-4679.
30. Webb,A.R. (2002) Statistical Pattern Recognition. John Wiley and Sons, London.
31. Yao,X. et al. (2001) Neural network ensembles and their application to traffic flow prediction in telecommunications networks. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks IEEE Press, Washington DC 1, pp. 693-698.