How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 162-168

  Cross, Fiona R ^a   Jackson, Robert R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ICIPE   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Aggression; Game theory; Olfaction; Perception; Priming; Salticidae; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

CONSPECIFIC; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GAME THEORY; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; MATE CHOICE; OLFACTION; PREDICTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPIDER;

AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; ODORS; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPIDERS;

CULICIVORA; EVARCHA; JACKSONOIDES QUEENSLANDICUS; PORTIA AFRICANA; PORTIA FIMBRIATA; SALTICIDAE;

EID: 58249107156     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adamo S.A., and Hoy R.R. Agonistic behaviour in male and female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, and how behavioural context influences its expression. Anim. Behav. 49 (1995) 1491-1501
2. Altmann J. Mate choice and intrasexual reproductive competition: contributions that go beyond acquiring more mates. In: Gowaty P.A. (Ed). Feminism and Evolutionary Biology (1997), Chapman & Hall, New York 320-333
3. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton 599 pp
4. Austad S.N. A game theory interpretation of male combat in the bowl and doily spider, Frontinella pyramitela. Anim. Behav. 31 (1983) 59-73
5. Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 (1948) 349-368
6. Blest A.D., O'Carroll D.C., and Carter M. Comparative ultrastructure of layer I receptor mosaics in principal eyes of jumping spiders: the evolution of regular arrays of light guides. Cell Tissue Res. 262 (1990) 445-460
7. In: Calvert G.A., Spence C., and Stein B.E. (Eds). The Handbook of Multisensory Processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 915 pp
8. Carducci J.P., and Jakob E.M. Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. Anim. Behav. 59 (2000) 39-46
9. Cratsley C.K., and Lewis S.M. Seasonal variation in mate choice of Photinus ignitus fireflies. Ethology 111 (2005) 89-100
10. Cross F.R., and Jackson R.R. From eight-legged automatons to thinking spiders. In: Fujita K., and Itakura S. (Eds). Diversity of Cognition (2006), Kyoto University Press, Kyoto 188-215
11. Cross F.R., Jackson R.R., and Pollard S.D. Male and female mate-choice decisions by Evarcha culicivora, an East African jumping spider. Ethology 113 (2007) 901-908
12. Cross F.R., Jackson R.R., and Pollard S.D. Complex display behaviour of Evarcha culicivora, an East African mosquito-eating jumping spider. N. Z. J. Zool. 35 (2008) 151-187
13. Cross F.R., Jackson R.R., Pollard S.D., and Walker M.W. Influence of optical cues from conspecific females on escalation decisions during male-male interactions of jumping spiders. Behav. Processes 73 (2006) 136-141
14. Cross F.R., Jackson R.R., Pollard S.D., and Walker M.W. Cross-modality effects during male-male interactions of jumping spiders. Behav. Processes 75 (2007) 290-296
15. Dow M.A., and von Schilcher F. Aggression and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 254 (1975) 511-512
16. Dowds B.M., and Elwood R.W. Shell wars: assessment strategies and the timing of decisions in hermit crab shell fights. Behaviour 85 (1983) 1-24
17. Drickamer L.C., Gowaty P.A., and Wagner D.M. Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 65 (2003) 105-114
18. In: Dugatkin L.A., and Reeve H.K. (Eds). Game Theory and Animal Behavior (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford 320 pp
19. Dukas R. Causes and consequences of limited attention. Brain Behav. Evol. 63 (2004) 197-210
20. Dukas R., and Kamil A.C. The cost of limited attention in blue jays. Behav. Ecol. 11 (2000) 502-506
21. Dukas R., and Kamil A.C. Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image. Behav. Ecol. 12 (2001) 192-199
22. Elias D.O., Kasumovic M.M., Punzalan D., Andrade M.C.B., and Mason A.C. Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders. Anim. Behav. 76 (2008) 901-910
23. Gowaty P.A., Drickamer L.C., and Schmid-Holmes S. Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Anim. Behav. 65 (2003) 95-103
24. Hack M.A., Thompson D.J., and Fernandes D.M. Fighting in males of the autumn spider, Metellina segmentata: effects of relative body size, prior residency and female value on contest outcome and duration. Ethology 103 (1997) 488-498
25. Harland D.P., and Jackson R.R. 'Eight-legged cats' and how they see-a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Cimbebasia 16 (2000) 231-240
26. Harland D.P., and Jackson R.R. Portia perceptions: the Umwelt of an araneophagic jumping spider. In: Prete F.R. (Ed). Complex Worlds from Simpler Nervous Systems (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 5-40
27. Harland D.P., Jackson R.R., and Macnab A.M. Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals. J. Zool. 247 (1999) 357-364
28. Hoefler C.D. Male mate choice and size-assortative pairing in a jumping spider, Phidippus clarus. Anim. Behav. 73 (2007) 943-954
29. Howell D.C. Statistical Methods for Psychology. fifth ed. (2002), Wadsworth, Belmont, California 802 pp
30. Hubble S.P., and Johnson L.K. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130 (1987) 91-112
31. Jackson R.R. The biology of Jacksonoides queenlandicus, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland: intraspecific interactions, web-invasion, predators, and prey. N. Z. J. Zool. 15 (1988) 1-37
32. Jackson R.R. Bloodthirsty spiders & syringes with wings. Nature E. Afr. 34 (2004) 30-35
33. Jackson R.R., Clark R.J., and Harland D.P. Behavioural and cognitive influences of kairomones on an araneophagic jumping spider. Behaviour 139 (2002) 749-775
34. Jackson R.R., and Hallas S.E.A. Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata and P. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecific interactions. N. Z. J. Zool. 13 (1986) 423-489
35. Jackson R.R., Nelson X.J., and Sune G.O. A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (2005) 15155-15160
36. Jackson R.R., and Pollard S.D. Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. In: Choe J.C., and Crespi B.J. (Eds). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 340-351
37. Jackson R.R., Walker M.W., Pollard S.D., and Cross F.R. Influence of seeing a female on the male-male interactions of a jumping spider, Hypoblemum albovittatum. J. Ethol. 24 (2006) 231-238
38. Kamil A.C. On the proper definition of cognitive ethology. In: Balda R.P., Pepperberg I.M., and Kamil A.C. (Eds). Animal Cognition in Nature (1998), Academic Press, San Diego 1-28
39. Kokko H., and Johnstone R.A. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 357 (2002) 319-330
40. Land M.F. Structure of the retinae of the principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics. J. Exp. Biol. 51 (1969) 443-470
41. Land M.F. Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli. J. Exp. Biol. 51 (1969) 471-493
42. Land M.F. Mechanisms of orientation and pattern recognition by jumping spiders (Salticidae). In: Wehner R. (Ed). Information Processing in the Visual Systems of Arthropods (1972), Springer, Berlin 231-247
43. Land M.F. A comparison of the visual behavior of a predatory arthropod with that of a mammal. In: Wiersma C.A.G. (Ed). Invertebrate Neurons and Behavior (1974), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 411-418
44. Land M.F., and Nilsson D.-E. Animal Eyes (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford 221 pp
45. Maynard Smith J., and Parker G.A. The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav. 24 (1976) 159-175
46. Nelson X.J., and Jackson R.R. A predator from East Africa that chooses malaria vectors as preferred prey. PLOS One 1 (2006) e132
47. Nilsen S.P., Chan Y.-B., Huber R., and Kravitz E.A. Gender-selective patterns of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 12342-12347
48. Parker G.A., and Rubenstein D.I. Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim. Behav. 29 (1981) 221-240
49. Pollard S.D., Macnab A.M., and Jackson R.R. Communication with chemicals: pheromones and spiders. In: Nentwig W. (Ed). Ecophysiology of Spiders (1987), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 133-141
50. Rovner J.S. Wolf spiders lack mirror-image responsiveness seen in jumping spiders. Anim. Behav. 38 (1989) 526-533
51. Rypstra A.L., Wieg C., Walker S.E., and Persons M.H. Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology 109 (2003) 315-325
52. Shettleworth S.J. Animal cognition and animal behaviour. Anim. Behav. 61 (2001) 277-286
53. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford 323 pp
54. Spieth H.T. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19 (1974) 385-405
55. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (1972), Aldine, Chicago 136-179
56. Verrell P.A. Wrestling in the red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens): resource value and contestant asymmetry determine contest duration and outcome. Anim. Behav. 34 (1986) 398-402
57. Vrontou E., Nilsen S.P., Demir E., Kravitz E.A., and Dickson B.J. Fruitless regulates aggression and dominance in Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 9 (2006) 1469-1471
58. Wells M.S. Effects of body size and resource value on fighting behaviour in a jumping spider. Anim. Behav. 36 (1988) 321-326
59. Williams D.S., and McIntyre P. The principal eyes of a jumping spider have a telephoto component. Nature 228 (1980) 578-580