Behavioural and cognitive influences of kairomones on an araneophagic jumping spider

Behaviour

Volumn 139, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 749-775

  Jackson, Robert R ^a   Clark, Robert J ^a   Harland, Duane P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attentional priming; Kairomones; Predation; Salticidae; Spiders

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036591318     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853902320262808     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alberts, A.C. (1992). Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in vertebrates. - Am. Nat. 139, p. 62-89.
2. Blanke, R. (1972). Untersuchungen zur Ökophysiologie und Ökethologie von Cyrtophora citricola Forskål (Araneae, Araneidae) in Andalusien. - Forma et Functio 5, p. 125-206.
3. Blest, A.D., O'Carroll, D.C. & Carter, M. (1990). Comparative ultrastructure of Layer 1 receptor mosaics in principal eyes of jumping spiders: the evolution of regular arrays of light guides. - Cell Tissue Res. 262, p. 445-460.
4. Blough, P.M. (1989). Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons. - J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 15, p. 358-365.
5. _ (1992). Detectability and choice during visual search: joint effects of sequential priming and discriminability. - Anim. Learn. Behav. 20, p. 293-300.
6. Bond, A.B. (1983). Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attentional threshold hypothesis. - J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process 9, p. 292-306.
7. Bossert, W.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1963). The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. - J. theor. Biol. 5, p. 443-469.
8. Brown, W.L., Eisner, T. & Whittaker, R.H. (1971). Allomones and kairomones: transpecific chemical messengers. - BioScience 20, p. 21-22.
9. Carducci, J.P. & Jakob, E.M. (2000). Rearing environment affects behaviour of jumping spiders. - Anim. Behav. 59, p. 39-46.
10. Clark, R.J. & Jackson, R.R. (1994). Self recognition in a jumping spider: Portia labiata females discriminate between their own draglines and those of conspecifics. - Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 6, p. 371-375.
11. _ & _ (1995). Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between the draglines of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics. - Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 7, p. 185-190.
12. _ & _ (2000a) Speculative hunting by an araneophagic salticid spider. - Behaviour 137, p. 1601-1612.
13. _ & _ (2000b). Web use during predatory encounters between Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider, and its preferred prey, other jumping spiders. - N.Z. J. Zool. 27, p. 129-136.
14. de Jong, M.C.M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1988). How bark beetles avoid interference with squatters: an ESS for colonization by Ips typografus. - Oikos 51, p. 88-96.
15. Dicke, M., Beek, T.A., Posthumus, M.A. Ben Dom, N., van Bokhoven, H. & de Groot, A.E. (1990). Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions. - J. Chem. Ecol. 16, p. 381-396.
16. Foelix, R.F. (1996). Biology of spiders. - Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Forbes, L.S. (1989). Prey defense and predatory handling behaviour: the dangerous prey hypothesis. - Oikos 55, p. 155-158.
18. Harland, D.P. & Jackson, R.R. (2000). Cues by which Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider, distinguishes jumping spider prey from other prey. - J. Exp. Biol. 203, p. 3485-3494.
19. _ & _ (2001). Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: species that elicit cryptic stalking. - J. Zool. Lond. 255, p. 445-460.
20. _, _ & Macnab A.M. (1999). Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals. - J. Zool. Lond. 247, p. 357-364.
21. Heimpel, G.E. & Hough-Goldstein, J.A. (1994). Search tactics and response to cues by predatory stink bugs. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 73, p. 193-197.
22. Jackson, R.R. (1987). Comparative study of releaser pheromones associated with the silk of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). - N.Z. J. Zool. 14, p. 1-10.
23. _ (1988). The biology of Jacksonoides queenslandicus, a jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland: intraspecific interactions, web-invasion, predators, and prey. - N.Z. J. Zool. 15, p. 1-37.
24. _ (1992). Eight legged tricksters. - BioScience 42, p. 590-598.
25. _ & Blest, A.D. (1982). The biology of Portia fimbriata, a web building jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Queensland: utilization of webs and predatory versatility. - J. Zool. Lond. 196, p. 255-292.
26. _ & Hallas, S.E.A. (1986). Comparative biology of Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata and P. schultzi, araneophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae): utilisation of webs, predatory versatility and intraspecific interactions. - N.Z. J. Zool. 13, p. 423-489.
27. _ & Pollard, S.D. (1996). Predatory behavior of jumping spiders. - Ann. Rev. Ent. 41, p. 287-308.
28. _ & _ (1997). Jumping spider mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs. - In: The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids (J. Choe & B. Crespi, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 340-350.
29. _ & Wilcox, R.S. (1998). Spider-eating spiders. - Amer. Sci. 86, p. 350-357.
30. Janssen, A. (1999). Plants with spider-mite prey attract more predatory mites than clean plants under greenhouse conditions. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90, p. 191-198.
31. _, Bruin, J., Jacobs, G., Schraag, R. & Sabelis, M.W. (1997). Predators use volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics. - J. Anim. Ecol. 66, p. 223-232.
32. _, van Alphen, J.J. M., Sabelis, M. W. & Bakker, K. (1995a). Odour-mediated avoidance of competition in Drosophila parasitoids: the ghost of competition. - Oikos 73, p. 356-366.
33. _, _, _ & _ (1995b). Specificity of odour-mediated avoidance of competition in Drosophila parasitoids. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, p. 229-235.
34. Kaston, B.J. (1936). The senses involved in the courtship of some vagabond spiders. - Ent. Amer. 16, p. 97-167.
35. Land, M.F. (1969a). Structure of the retinae of the principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: Dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics. - J. Exp. Biol. 51, p. 443-470.
36. _ (1969b). Movements of the retinae of jumping spiders (Salticidae, Dendryphantinae) in response to visual stimuli. - J. Exp. Biol. 51, p. 471-493.
37. Langley, C.M., Riley, D.A., Bond, A.B. & Goel, N. (1996). Visual search for natural grains in pigeons (Columba livia): search images and selective attention. - J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 22, p. 139-151.
38. Li, D. & Jackson, R.R. (1996). Prey preferences of Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic, web-building jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Queensland. - J. Insect Behav. 9, p. 613-642.
39. _ & _ (1997). Influence of diet on survivorship and growth in Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). - Can. J. Zool. 75, p. 1652-1658.
40. _, _ & Barrion, A. (1997). Prey preferences of Portia labiata, P. africana, and P. schultzi, araneophagic jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Kenya, and Uganda. - N.Z. J. Zool. 24, p. 333-349.
41. Millot, J. (1945). Sens chemiques et sens visuel chez les araignées. - L'Année Biologique 22, p. 1-21.
42. Papke, M.D., Reichert, S.E. & Schulz, S. (2001). An airbourne female pheromone associated with male attraction and courtship in a desert spider. - Anim. Behav. 61, p. 877-886.
43. Pallini, A., Janssen, A. & Sabelis, M.W. (1997). Odour-mediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. - Oecologia 110, p. 179-185.
44. Persons, M.H. & Rypstra, A.L. (2000). Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Ethology 106, p. 27-35.
45. _ & Uetz, G.W. (1996). Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). - J. Arachnol. 24, p. 76-79.
46. Poland, T.M. & Borden J.H. (1994). Semiochemical-based communication in interspecific interactions between Ips pini (Say) and Pityogenes knechteli (Swaine) (Coleoptera: Scolytylidae) in lodgepole pine. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, p. 151-154.
47. Pollard, S.D., Macnab, A.M. & Jackson, R.R. (1987). Communication with chemicals: pheromones and spiders - In: Ecophysiology of spiders (W. Nentwig, ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, p. 133-141.
48. Raffa, K.F. & Dahlsten, D.L. (1995). Differential responses among natural enemies and prey to bark beetle pheromones. - Oecologia 102, p. 17-23.
49. Rice, W.R. (1989). Analysing tables of statistical tests. - Evolution 43, p. 223-225.
50. Robinson, M.H. (1982). Courtship and mating behavior in spiders. - Ann. Rev. Ent. 27, p. 1-20.
51. Roitblat, H.L. (1987). Introduction to comparative cognition. - W.H. Freeman and Co, New York.
52. Sabelis, M.W., Vermaat, J.E. & Groeneveld A. (1984). Arrestment response of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis to steep odour gradients of a kairomone. - Physiol. Entomol. 9, p. 437-446.
53. _ & van de Baan, H.E. (1983). Location of distant spider mite colonies by phytoseiid predators: demonstration of specific kairomones emitted by Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. - Entomol. Exper. Appl. 33, p. 303-314.
54. Schulz, S. & Toft, S. (1997). Identification of sex pheromone from a spider. Science 260, p. 1635-1637.
55. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. - Third edition. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.
56. Taylor, P.W. (1998). Dragline-mediated mate-searching in Trite planiceps (Araneae, Salticidae). - J. Arachnol. 26, p. 330-334.
57. Tarsitano, M.S. & Jackson, R.R. (1997) Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between detour routes that do and do not lead to prey. - Anim. Behav. 53, p. 257-266.
58. Teerling, C.R., Gillespie, D.R. & Borden, J.H. (1993). Utilization of western flower thrips alarm pheromone as a prey-finding kairomone by predators. - Can. Entomol. 125, p. 431-437.
59. Tietjen, W.J. & Rovner, J.S. (1982) Chemical communication in lycosids and other spiders. - In: Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 249-279.
60. Tinbergen, L. (1960). The natural control of insects in pinewoods. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. - Archs Neer. Zool. 13, p. 265-343.
61. Trabalon, M., Bagnères, A.G. & Roland, C. (1997). Contact sex signals in two sympatric spider species, Tegenaria domestica and Tegenaria pagana. - J. Chem. Ecol. 23, p. 747-758.
62. Tumlinson, J.H., Turlings, T.C.J. & Lewis, W.J. (1992). The semiochemical complexes that mediate insect parasitoid foraging. - Agr. Zool. Rev. 5, p. 221-252.
63. Vet, L.E.M. & Dicke, M. (1992). Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. - Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37, p. 141-172.
64. Wilcox, R.S. & Jackson, R.R. (1998). Cognitive abilities of araneophagic jumping spiders. In: Animal cognition in nature: the convergence of psychology and biology in laboratory and field (R.P. Balda, I.M. Pepperberg & A.C. Kamil, eds). Academic Press, New York, p. 411-433.
65. Yasuda, T. (1997). Chemical cues from Spodoptera litura larvae elicit prey-locating behavior by the predatory stink bug, Eocanthecona furcellata. - Entomol. Exper. Appl. 82, p. 349-354.