Accuracy of liver lesion assessment using automated measurement and segmentation software in biphasic multislice CT (MSCT);Einfluss des vaskularisationsgrades auf die automatische segmentierung und messung von lebertumoren nach RECIST in einer biphasischen multi-slice-CT (MSCT)

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 181, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 67-73

  Puesken, M ^a   Juergens, Kai Uwe ^a   Edenfeld, A ^a   Buerke, B ^a   Seifarth, H ^a   Beyer, F ^a   Suehling, M ^b   Osada, N ^a   Heindel, W ^a   Wessling J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CT spiral; Liver lesions; RECIST; Segmentation software; Volumetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; LIVER ABSCESS; LIVER CANCER; LIVER CARCINOMA; LIVER CIRCULATION; LIVER CYST; LIVER DISEASE; LIVER HEMANGIOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CYST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HEMANGIOMA; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIVER; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER TUMOR; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR; CYSTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMANGIOMA; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIVER; LIVER ABSCESS; LIVER DISEASES; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LYMPHOMA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; PORTAL VEIN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SPIRAL CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 58249088928     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027848     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Miller AB, Hogestraeten B, Staquet M et al. Reporting results of cancer traetment. Cancer 1981; 47: 207-214
2. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205-216 (Pubitemid 30099779)
3. Heußel CP, Meier S, Wittelsberger S et al. Quantitative CT-Verlaufskontrolle von Lebermalignomen nach RECIST und WHO im Vergleich zur Volumetrie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 958-964 (Pubitemid 47596421)
4. Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S et al. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 781-790 (Pubitemid 43380236)
5. Graser A, Kolligs FT, Mang T et al. Computer-aided detection in CT colonography: initial clinical experience using a prototype system. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2608-2615
6. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M et al. Colonic polyps: complemetary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002; 225: 391-399 (Pubitemid 35239238)
7. Prasad SR, Saini S, Sumner JE et al. Radiological measurements of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27: 380-384 (Pubitemid 36793188)
8. van Hoe L, van Cutsem E, Vergote I et al. Size quantification of liver-metastases in patients undergoing cancer treatment: reproducibility of one-, two-, and three-dimensional measurements determined with spiral CT. Radiology 1997; 202: 671-675 (Pubitemid 27093435)
9. Bland A, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between twomethods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
10. Krix M, Plathow C, Essig M et al. Monitoring of liver metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy using low-MI contrast-enhanced untrasound-initial results. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 677-684 (Pubitemid 40500735)
11. Kiessling F, Boese J, Corvinus C et al. Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas: a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 1226-1233
12. Kühl H, Stattaus J, Kühl B et al. Radiofrewuenzablation von malignen Lebertumoren: Erlaubt ein volumetrischer Nekrose-/Tumor-Quotient eine Vorhersage zur lokalen Tumorkontrolle? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1243-1249
13. Park JO, Lee SI, Song SYet al. Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2003; 33: 533-537
14. Hauth EAM, Stattaus J, Forsting M. Vergleich uni- und bidimensionaler Messverfahren zur Beurteilung des Therapieansprechens bei der Behandlung solider Tumoren. Radiologe 2007; 47: 628, 630-634
15. Prasad SR, Jhaveri KS, Saini S et al. CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques - initial observations. Radiology 2002; 225: 416-419 (Pubitemid 35239241)
16. James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 523-528 (Pubitemid 29157060)
17. Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E et al. Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 203-212
18. Tran LN, Brown MS, Goldin JG et al. Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional und volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 1355-1360
19. Garant M, Trudeau M, Reinhold C et al. Liver metastasis: comparison of 2 methods for reporting of disease in patients receiving chemotherapy. Can Assoc Radiol J 1999; 50: 13-16 (Pubitemid 29162144)