Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurement to assess therapeutic response in the treatment of solid tumors;Vergleich uni- und bidimensionaler messverfahren zur beurteilung des therapieansprechens bei der behandlung solider tumoren

Radiologe

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 628-634

  Hauth, E A M ^a   Stattaus, J ^a   Forsting, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assessment of treatment response; RECIST; Therapy; Tumor size; WHO

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIDIMENSIONAL IMAGING; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KAPPA STATISTICS; LIVER METASTASIS; LUNG CANCER; LUNG METASTASIS; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MELANOSIS; SOLID TUMOR; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR VOLUME; UNIDIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; AGED; ALGORITHM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38149124062     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1329-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gehan EA, Tefft MC (2000) Will there be resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Response Tumors)? J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 179-181
2. Gurland J, Johnson RO (1965) How reliable are tumor measurements. JAMA 194: 973-978
3. Hilsenbeck SG, von Hoff DD (1999) Measure once or twice - does it really matter? J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 1780-1781
4. Hopper KD, Singapuri K, Finkel A (2000) Body CT and oncologic imaging. Radiology 215: 27-40
5. James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, Terenziani M, Muldal A, Therasse P (1999) Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 523-528
6. Lavin PT, Flowerdew G (1980) Studies in variation associated with the measurement of solid tumors. Cancer 46: 1286-1290
7. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer; 47(1): 207-214
8. Padhani AR, Ollivier L (2001) The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol 74: 983-986
9. Prasad SR, Saini S, Summer JE, Hahn PF, Sahani D, Boland GW (2003) Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(3): 380-384
10. Sohaib SA, Turner B, Hanson JA, Farquharson M, Oliver RTD, Reznek RH (2000) CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. Br J Radiol 73: 1178-1184
11. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205-216
12. Werner-Wasik M, Xiao Y, Pequignot E, Curran WJ, Hauck W (2001) Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product and volume. A serial CT scan-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51(1): 56-61
13. World Health Organization (1979) WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment. WHO Offset Publication No. 48. Word Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
14. Yoshida S, Miyata Y, Ohtsu A, Boku N, Shirao K, Shimada Y and the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2000) Significance of and problems in adopting response evaluation criteria in solid tumor RECIST for assessing anticancer effects of advanced gastric cancer. Gastr Cancer 3: 128-133