Comparison of lens thickness measurements using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography and A-scan ultrasonography

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 290-294

  Zeng, Yangfa ^a   Liu, Yizhi ^a   Liu, Xing ^a   Chen, Chuying ^a   Xia, Yuanling ^a   Lu, Miaoling ^a   He, Mingguang ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A SCAN; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; ADOLESCENT; BIOMETRY; ECHOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMETRY; CATARACT; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58249088274     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1216     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schachar RA, Pierscionek BK, Abolmaali A, Le T. The relationship between accommodative amplitude and the ratio of central lens thickness to its equatorial diameter in vertebrate eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(6):812- 817.
2. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Klein BE, Seah SK. The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6): 1237-1242.
3. Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angleclosure glaucoma: biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54:161-169.
4. Yip LW, Aquino MC, Chew PT. Measurement of anterior lens growth after acute primary angle-closure glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42:321-322.
5. Lim MC, Lim LS, Gazzard G, et al. Lens opacity, thickness, and position in subjects with acute primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:260-263.
6. Nemeth G, Vajas A, Tsorbatzoglou A, Kolozsvari B, Modis L Jr, Berta A. Assessment and reproducibility of anterior chamber depth measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography compared with immersion ultrasonography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:443-447.
7. Brooks AM, West RH, Gillies WE. The risks of precipitating acute angle-closure glaucoma with the clinical use of mydriatic agents. Med J Aust. 1986;145:34-36.
8. Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, Wei J. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1843-1850.
9. Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR, et al. Anterior chamber width measurement by high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:238-244.
10. Baikoff G, Lutun E, Wei J, Ferraz C. Anterior chamber optical coherence tomography study of human natural accommodation in a 19-year-old albino. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:696-701.
11. Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis? Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):551-557.
12. Dada T, Sihota R, Gadia R, Aggarwal A, Mandal S, Gupta V. Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(5):837- 840.
13. Emery JM, Little JH. Phacoemulsification and Aspiration of Cataracts; Surgical Techniques, Complications, and Results. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1979;45-49.
14. Lavanya R, Teo L, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(8): 1023-1026.
15. British Standards Institute. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results: General Principles and Definitions. London: HMO; 1994. Publication no. BS ISO 5725 part 1.
16. British Standards Institute. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results: Basic Methods for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method. London: HMO;1994. Publication no. BS ISO 5725 part 2.
17. Sacu S, Findl O, Buehl W, Kiss B, Gleiss A, Drexler W. Optical biometry of the anterior eye segment: interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of ACMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31: 2334-2339.
18. Goel S, Chua C, Butcher M, Jones CA, Bagga P, Kotta S. Laser vs ultrasound biometry: a study of intra- and interobserver variability. Eye. 2004;18:514-518.
19. Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K. Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:228-232.
20. Zhao PS, Wong TY, Wong WL, Saw SM, Aung T. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography with ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:1047-1049.
21. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:524-534.
22. Dubbelman M, van der Heijde GL, Weeber HA. The thickness of the aging human lens obtained from corrected Scheimpflug images. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:411-416.
23. Baikoff G, Jodai HJ, Bourgeon G. Measurement of the internal diameter and depth of the anterior chamber: IOLMaster versus anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1722-1728.