Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination

Psychological Research

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 34-42

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Krauss, Henrike ^b   Weigelt, Matthias ^c  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FOREARM; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; FOREARM; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GOALS; HAND; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 58149518828     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0140-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. N. Albert M. Weigelt E. Hazeltine R. B. Ivry 2007 Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 1107 1116
2. J. Diedrichsen E. Hazeltine S. Kennerley R. B. Ivry 2001 Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions Psychological Science 12 6 493 498
3. J. Diedrichsen R. B. Ivry E. Hazeltine S. Kennerley A. Cohen 2003 Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 64 77
4. J. Diedrichsen S. Grafton N. Albert E. Hazeltine R. B. Ivry 2006 Goal-selection and movement-related conflict during bimanual reaching movements Cerebral Cortex 16 12 1729 1738
5. E. A. Franz J. C. Eliassen R. B. Ivry M. S. Gazzaniga 1996 Dissociation of spatial and temporal coupling in the bimanual movements of callosotomy patients Psychological Science 7 306 310
6. E. Hazeltine J. Diedrichsen S. W. Kennerley R. B. Ivry 2003 Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of movement parameters Psychological Research 67 56 70
7. H. Heuer 1993 Structural constraints on bimanual movements Psychological Research 55 83 98
8. H. Heuer W. Klein 2006 The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions Psychological Research 70 229 244
9. Ivry, R. B., Diedrichsen, J., Spencer, R. C. M., Hazeltine, E., & Semjen, A. (2004). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on bimanual coordination. In: S. Swinnen, & J. Duysens (Eds.), Neuro-behavioral determinants of interlimb coordination (pp. 259-295). Boston: Kluwer.
10. James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published, 1890).
11. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. S. Kennerley J. Diedrichsen E. Hazeltine A. Semjen R. B. Ivry 2002 Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal and spatial uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements Nature Neuroscience 5 376 381
13. S. M. Kosslyn C. B. Cave A. D. Provost S. M. von Gierke 1988 Sequential processes in image generation Cognitive Psychology 20 319 333
14. W. Kunde M. Weigelt 2005 Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 1 145 156
15. F. Mechsner G. Knoblich 2004 Do muscles matter in bimanual coordination? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 3 490 503
16. F. Mechsner D. Kerzel G. Knoblich W. Prinz 2001 Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination Nature 414 69 73
17. R. S. Nickerson 1965 Response times for "same"- "different" judgments Perceptual and Motor Skills 20 15 18
18. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. M. J. Posner R. F. Mitchell 1967 Chronometric analyses of classification Psychological Review 74 392 409
20. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 3rd Edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
21. W. Spijkers H. Heuer 1995 Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A 716 740
22. W. Spijkers H. Heuer T. Kleinsorge H. van der Loo 1997 Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time Acta Psychologica 96 207 227
23. W. Spijkers H. Heuer C. Steglich T. Kleinsorge 2000 Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: Evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 1091 1105
24. Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In: D. Scarborough, S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Volume 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues (pp. 703-863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. S. P. Swinnen N. Wenderoth 2004 Two hands, one brain: Cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 18 25
26. M. Weigelt 2007 Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: The role of starting locations, movement amplitude, and target locations Human Movement Science 26 212 225
27. M. Weigelt M. Rieger F. Mechsner W. Prinz 2007 Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements Psychological Research 71 4 438 447